Endoscopy 2009; 41(12): 1082-1089
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1215269
Review

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Review of endoscopic devices for weight reduction: old and new balloons and implantable prostheses

N.  Tsesmeli1 , D.  Coumaros1
  • 1Service d’ Hépatogastroentérologie, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

submitted 23 August 2008

accepted after revision 16 July 2009

Publikationsdatum:
06. November 2009 (online)

Preview

Abstract

The worldwide epidemic of obesity is forecast to worsen with a concomitant increase in the burden of co-morbid conditions. Bariatric surgery has some disadvantages, and intragastric balloons (IGBs) represent a generally safe, reversible and less invasive approach to weight reduction, based on occupying gastric space to enhance the sensation of satiety. A literature review found that the majority of the published data on IGBs relates to the Bioenterics intragastric balloon (BIB). The evidence for the efficacy of the BIB as a primary means of weight loss is still unconvincing, but it appears to have value in subgroups of patients, for example to improve quality of life, ameliorate co-morbidities, or provide a bridge to surgery. Regarding other IGBs, even if there are promising weight loss results, more evidence and development is generally needed: it is difficult to evaluate the Heliosphere Bag because of the limited clinical experience; the Adjustable Totally Implantable Intragastric Prosthesis (ATIIP)-Endogast may have problems associated with the percutaneous endoscopic gastrotomy (PEG)-type insertion method; the Semistationary Antral Balloon (SAB) may require technical improvements; and the Silimed Gastric Balloon (SGB) warrants further investigation. Another implantable device, the endoscopic duodenal-jejunal sleeve is based on a different concept, that of mimicking bariatric surgery; it effectively bypasses the duodenum and jejunum, and shows promising results. Other endoscopically implantable devices, such as the ”Butterfly“ and tubular membranes are at an experimental stage.

References

N. TsesmeliMD 

Service d’Hépatogastroentérologie
Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg

1, place de l’Hôpital
Strasbourg
France

Fax: +33-3-88116337

eMail: tsesniki@gmail.com