Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-2695-2258
Effects of Osteochondral Allograft Reaming Protocols on Donor Chondrocyte Viability Prior to Transplantation
Funding Information K.R. was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health and the Advanced Research Projects Agency for Health.

Abstract
This preclinical ex vivo study was conducted to evaluate the effects of submersion in saline or the Missouri Osteochondral Preservation System (MOPS®) solution during reaming on viable chondrocyte density (VCD) of osteochondral allografts (OCAs). Distal femoral OCAs preserved with MOPS were reamed to create cylindrical “plug” grafts using one of three techniques: Submersion in MOPS (SG–MOPS), submersion in saline (SG–Saline), or reamer saturated with MOPS without OCA submersion (SR–MOPS). All plug reaming was performed using standardized instrumentation and technique to harvest 18-mm-diameter plugs. Pre-reaming cartilage samples were collected to confirm baseline VCD. Post-reaming plugs were bisected and stained for live/dead analysis using fluorescent microscopy. VCD was quantified via image analysis, and %Day-0 VCD was calculated. Group comparisons were made using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA; α = 0.05). A total of 21 plugs from 9 donors were analyzed: SG–MOPS (n = 8), SG–Saline (n = 6), SR–MOPS (n = 7). Mean %Day-0 VCD was highest in SG–MOPS (92.6 ± 7.8%), followed by SG–Saline (83.3 ± 10.2%), and SR–MOPS (80.2 ± 9.1%), though differences were not statistically significant (p = 0.68). A higher proportion of SG–MOPS plugs (7/8, 88%) exceeded the minimum essential VCD threshold (70%) compared with SG–Saline (4/6, 67%) and SR–MOPS (3/7, 43%). Submerging distal femur OCAs in MOPS during 18-mm-diameter femoral condyle plug reaming had clinically meaningful beneficial effects on viable donor chondrocyte density when compared with saline-submerged or non-submerged grafts. Based on the use of this submerged reaming technique that is standardized, repeatable, readily available, cost-effective, and safe, this methodology can be considered “best practice” for OCA plug reaming protocols, motivating implementation of this evidence-based shift in practice at our institution.
Keywords
osteochondral allograft - transplantation - tissue preservation - viable chondrocyte density - reaming techniqueEthical Approval
The University of Missouri's Institutional Review Board (IRB #1208392) approved this study.
Publication History
Received: 26 August 2025
Accepted: 03 September 2025
Accepted Manuscript online:
04 September 2025
Article published online:
25 September 2025
© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1 Familiari F, Cinque ME, Chahla J. et al. Clinical outcomes and failure rates of osteochondral allograft transplantation in the knee: A systematic review. Am J Sports Med 2018; 46 (14) 3541-3549
- 2 Assenmacher AT, Pareek A, Reardon PJ, Macalena JA, Stuart MJ, Krych AJ. Long-term outcomes after osteochondral allograft: A systematic review at long-term follow-up of 12.3 years. Arthroscopy 2016; 32 (10) 2160-2168
- 3 Cook JL, Stannard JP, Stoker AM. et al. A bedside-to-bench-to-bedside journey to advance osteochondral allograft transplantation towards biologic joint restoration. J Knee Surg 2025; 38 (05) 256-271
- 4 Cook JL, Rucinski K, Crecelius CR, Stannard JP. Initial outcomes after unicompartmental tibiofemoral bipolar osteochondral and meniscal allograft transplantation in the knee using MOPS-preserved fresh (viable) tissues. Am J Sports Med 2023; 51 (03) 596-604
- 5 Cook JL, Rucinski K, Crecelius C, Fenkell B, Stannard JP. Assessment of outcomes after multisurface osteochondral allograft transplantations in the knee. Orthop J Sports Med 2022; 10 (06) 23 259671221102452
- 6 Frank RM, Lee S, Cotter EJ, Hannon CP, Leroux T, Cole BJ. Outcomes of osteochondral allograft transplantation with and without concomitant meniscus allograft transplantation: A comparative matched group analysis. Am J Sports Med 2018; 46 (03) 573-580
- 7 Rucinski K, Cook JL, Crecelius CR, Stucky R, Stannard JP. Effects of compliance with procedure-specific postoperative rehabilitation protocols on initial outcomes after osteochondral and meniscal allograft transplantation in the knee. Orthop J Sports Med 2019; 7 (11) 2325967119884291
- 8 Cook JL, Stannard JP, Stoker AM. et al. Importance of donor chondrocyte viability for osteochondral allografts. Am J Sports Med 2016; 44 (05) 1260-1268
- 9 Buyuk AF, Stannard JP, Rucinski K, Crecelius CR, Cook JL. The Missouri Osteochondral Preservation System is associated with better short-term outcomes than standard preservation methods when performing osteochondral allograft transplantation using shell grafts for patellofemoral lesions. Arthroscopy 2023; 39 (03) 650-659
- 10 Stoker AM, Stannard JP, Cook JL. Chondrocyte viability at time of transplantation for osteochondral allografts preserved by the Missouri Osteochondral Preservation System versus standard tissue bank protocol. J Knee Surg 2018; 31 (08) 772-780
- 11 Stoker AM, Caldwell KM, Stannard JP, Cook JL. Metabolic responses of osteochondral allografts to re-warming. J Orthop Res 2019; 37 (07) 1530-1536
- 12 Stoker AM, Stannard JP, Kuroki K, Bozynski CC, Pfeiffer FM, Cook JL. Validation of the Missouri Osteochondral Allograft Preservation System for the maintenance of osteochondral allograft quality during prolonged storage. Am J Sports Med 2018; 46 (01) 58-65
- 13 Oladeji LO, Stannard JP, Cook CR. et al. Effects of autogenous bone marrow aspirate concentrate on radiographic integration of femoral condylar osteochondral allografts. Am J Sports Med 2017; 45 (12) 2797-2803
- 14 Baumann CA, Baumann JR, Bozynski CC, Stoker AM, Stannard JP, Cook JL. Comparison of techniques for preimplantation treatment of osteochondral allograft bone. J Knee Surg 2019; 32 (01) 97-104
- 15 Pisanu G, Cottino U, Rosso F. et al. Large osteochondral allografts of the knee: Surgical technique and indications. Joints 2018; 6 (01) 42-53
- 16 Stannard JP, Cook JL. Prospective assessment of outcomes after primary unipolar, multisurface, and bipolar osteochondral allograft transplantations in the knee: A comparison of 2 preservation methods. Am J Sports Med 2020; 48 (06) 1356-1364
- 17 Tabbaa SM, Guilak F, Sah RL, Bugbee WD. Fresh osteochondral and chondral allograft preservation and storage media: A systematic review of the literature. Am J Sports Med 2022; 50 (06) 1702-1716
- 18 Patil S, Butcher W, D'Lima DD, Steklov N, Bugbee WD, Hoenecke HR. Effect of osteochondral graft insertion forces on chondrocyte viability. Am J Sports Med 2008; 36 (09) 1726-1732
- 19 Elias TJ, Allahabadi S, Haneberg E. et al. Osteochondral allograft reaming significantly affects chondrocyte viability. Am J Sports Med 2024; 52 (11) 2874-2881
- 20 Medina G, Görtz S. Osteochondral techniques: Where are we now?. J Cartil Jt Preserv 2023; 3 (01) 100105