Endoscopy
DOI: 10.1055/a-2639-1875
Original article

Aggressive versus conservative endotherapy for gastric varices in cirrhosis: a randomized controlled trial

1   Department of Gastroenterology, Surat Institute of Digestive Sciences, Surat, India
,
Subhash K. Nandwani
1   Department of Gastroenterology, Surat Institute of Digestive Sciences, Surat, India
,
Rajiv M. Mehta
1   Department of Gastroenterology, Surat Institute of Digestive Sciences, Surat, India
,
Mayank V. Kabrawala
1   Department of Gastroenterology, Surat Institute of Digestive Sciences, Surat, India
,
Pankaj N. Desai
1   Department of Gastroenterology, Surat Institute of Digestive Sciences, Surat, India
,
Chintan N. Patel
1   Department of Gastroenterology, Surat Institute of Digestive Sciences, Surat, India
,
Nisarg Patel
1   Department of Gastroenterology, Surat Institute of Digestive Sciences, Surat, India
,
Mohit Sethia
1   Department of Gastroenterology, Surat Institute of Digestive Sciences, Surat, India
,
Rinkal Kakadiya
1   Department of Gastroenterology, Surat Institute of Digestive Sciences, Surat, India
,
Kamlesh Magnani
1   Department of Gastroenterology, Surat Institute of Digestive Sciences, Surat, India
,
Ashish Kumar
2   Department of Gastroenterology, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, India
› Author Affiliations
Clinical Trial: Registration number (trial ID): CTRI/2022/02/040188, Trial registry: Clinical Trials Registry India (http://www.ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials), Type of Study: Open labelled, Prospective, Randomized, Single-center study


Preview

Abstract

Background

Gastric variceal bleeding in cirrhosis remains a challenging clinical problem with variations in management strategies. This randomized controlled trial compared aggressive versus conservative cyanoacrylate therapy for gastric varices in patients with cirrhosis presenting with their first variceal bleed.

Methods

Patients with cirrhosis and large gastric varices (GOV1, GOV2, IGV1) and a first episode of variceal bleeding were randomized to receive aggressive endotherapy (Group A) or conservative endotherapy (Group B). In Group A, all visible gastric varices were obliterated using cyanoacrylate glue; in Group B, only varices with stigmata of recent hemorrhage or high-risk features were treated. The primary outcome was variceal rebleeding at 1 year. Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality, variceal obliteration time, and adverse events.

Results

145 patients were analyzed (Group A 72; Group B 73). At 1 year, the cumulative incidence of rebleeding was comparable between groups (18.2% vs. 15.0%). All-cause mortality at 1 year was also similar (22.2% vs. 32.9%), with a hazard ratio of 0.63 (95%CI 0.33–1.18; P = 0.15), suggesting a nonsignificant 37% reduction in mortality risk with aggressive endotherapy. Time to obliteration of GOV1 varices was shorter in Group A, with a median (range) of 4 (4–20) vs. 8 (4–116) weeks in Group B. Similarly, the number of endoscopic sessions required for GOV1 obliteration was fewer in Group A (1 [1–4] vs. 2 [1–5] sessions). Adverse event rates were comparable across both groups.

Conclusion

Aggressive endotherapy resulted in rebleeding and mortality rates similar to those of conservative therapy.

Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 20 December 2024

Accepted after revision: 17 June 2025

Accepted Manuscript online:
17 June 2025

Article published online:
19 August 2025

© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany