Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
DOI: 10.1055/a-2607-6390
Original Cardiovascular

Delayed Sternal Closure in Heart Surgery: Outcomes and Quality of Life

Henrik Heuer
1   Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg, BY, Germany
,
Zhiyang Song
2   Institute of Mathematics, Ludwig-Maximilian University Munich, Munich, BY, Germany
,
Philipp Hegner
3   Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg, BY, Germany
,
André Truong
1   Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg, BY, Germany
,
Sigrid Wiesner
1   Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg, BY, Germany
,
Armando Terrazas
1   Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg, BY, Germany
,
Christopher Larisch
1   Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg, BY, Germany
,
Hans-Christoph Aigner
4   Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg, BY, Germany
,
Bernhard Floerchinger
1   Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg, BY, Germany
,
Christof Schmid
1   Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg, BY, Germany
,
Jing Li
1   Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg, BY, Germany
5   Department of Occupational Medicine, University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg, BY, Germany
› Author Affiliations

Funding P.H. was funded by a Clinician Scientist Research Grant from the German Cardiac Society (DGK).

Abstract

Background

Delayed sternal closure (DSC) is a well-established strategy used to manage patients with hemodynamic instability and perioperative coagulopathy following cardiac surgery. The study aims to present our 15-year surgical experiences with DSC.

Methods

Between 2007 and 2022, DSC was performed in 227 out of 14,210 patients (1.7%) who underwent cardiac surgery at our institution. Perioperative data, outcomes, and long-term survival were analyzed. Quality of life (QoL) was assessed utilizing the EuroQol-5D-5L questionnaire.

Results

Indications for DSC included low cardiac output syndrome (LCOS) (44.1%) and coagulopathy during the index procedure (32.2%), as well as postoperative tamponade (22.9%). In coronary artery bypass grafting, LCOS was the primary indication for DSC (72.7%), whereas in acute type A aortic dissection, coagulopathy was the leading indication (70.6%). For other procedures, DSC indications were more evenly distributed. The overall 30-day survival was 57.5%, with survival rates of 43.3% for LCOS, 72.0% for coagulopathy, and 65.4% for tamponade. Multivariate logistic regression identified body mass index, postoperative renal replacement therapy, aggravated heart failure, and intraoperative packed red blood cell transfusion as negatively associated with 30-day survival. The mean follow-up period was 6.58 ± 3.19 years. Younger patients and DSC patients upon bleeding related indications reported higher QoL in comparison to older patients and patients with LCOS. Longer follow-up interval correlated with higher QoL.

Conclusion

The study emphasizes the significant impact of LCOS on outcomes in patients undergoing DSC. We provide QoL data demonstrating good rehabilitation potential upon survival of the acute phase.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.


Ethical Approval Statement

Ethical approval for this study was granted by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Regensburg, Germany (approval number 23–3427–104). All research was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (most recent revision in 2013).


Authors' Contribution

Conceptualization: H.H. and J.L.; Data curation: H.H., J.T., and J.L.; Formal analysis: H.H., Z.S., and A.T.; Investigation: H.H., Z.S., S.W., H.A., C.L., P.H., B.F., and J.L.; Methodology: H.H., Z.S., and J.L.; Project Administration: H.H. and J.L.; Resources: A.T, S.W., H.A., C.L., B.F., and C.S.; Software: H.H., Z.S., and J.L.; Supervision: J.L.; Validation: Z.S. and J.L.; Visualization: H.H. and Z.S.; Writing—original draft: H.H. and J.L.; Writing—review & editing: H.H., A.T., S.W., H.A., C.L., P.H., B.F., C.S., and J.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.




Publication History

Received: 09 January 2025

Accepted: 08 May 2025

Accepted Manuscript online:
14 May 2025

Article published online:
29 May 2025

© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 Hashemzadeh K, Hashemzadeh S. In-hospital outcomes of delayed sternal closure after open cardiac surgery. J Card Surg 2009; 24 (01) 30-33
  • 2 Boeken U, Assmann A, Mehdiani A, Akhyari P, Lichtenberg A. Open chest management after cardiac operations: outcome and timing of delayed sternal closure. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2011; 40 (05) 1146-1150
  • 3 Lim HA, Shin J, Jo MS, Chang YJ, Cho DG, Sim HT. Delayed sternal closure using a vacuum-assisted closure system in adult cardiac surgery. J Chest Surg 2023; 56 (03) 206-212
  • 4 Alagha S, Çiçekçioğlu F, Ekim H, Miniksar ÖH. Early and mid-term outcomes of delayed sternum closure strategy in adult cardiac surgery: a single-center experience. Heart Surg Forum 2023; 26 (03) E209-E218
  • 5 Bakaeen FG, Haddad O, Ibrahim M. et al. Advances in managing the noninfected open chest after cardiac surgery: negative-pressure wound therapy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2019; 157 (05) 1891-1903.e9
  • 6 Huber MB, Reitmeir P, Vogelmann M, Leidl R. EQ-5D-5L in the general German population: comparison and evaluation of three yearly cross-section surveys. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2016; 13 (03) 343
  • 7 Calafiore AM, Sheikh AA, Alfonso JJ. et al. Elective primary or secondary delayed sternal closure improves outcome in severely compromised patients. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2018; 66 (06) 500-507
  • 8 Anderson CA, Filsoufi F, Aklog L, Farivar RS, Byrne JG, Adams DH. Liberal use of delayed sternal closure for postcardiotomy hemodynamic instability. Ann Thorac Surg 2002; 73 (05) 1484-1488
  • 9 Li J, Stadlbauer A, Heller A. et al. Impact of fluid balance and blood transfusion during extracorporeal circulation on outcome for acute type A aortic dissection surgery. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 2022; 63 (06) 734-741
  • 10 Yasa H, Lafçi B, Yilik L. et al. Delayed sternal closure: an effective procedure for life-saving in open-heart surgery. Anadolu Kardiyol Derg 2010; 10 (02) 163-167
  • 11 Wong JK, Joshi DJ, Melvin AL. et al. Early and late outcomes with prolonged open chest management after cardiac surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2017; 154 (03) 915-924
  • 12 Riahi M, Tomatis LA, Schlosser RJ, Bertolozzi E, Johnston DW. Cardiac compression due to closure of the median sternotomy in open heart surgery. Chest 1975; 67 (01) 113-114
  • 13 Rupprecht L, Schopka S, Keyser A. et al. 25 years' experience with redo operations in cardiac surgery-third-time sternotomy procedures. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2022; 70 (05) 377-383
  • 14 Donatelli F, Triggiani M, Benussi S, Grossi A. Advantages of delayed sternal closure in cardiac-compromised adult patients. J Card Surg 1995; 10 (06) 632-636
  • 15 Boeken U, Feindt P, Schurr P, Assmann A, Akhyari P, Lichtenberg A. Delayed sternal closure (DSC) after cardiac surgery: outcome and prognostic markers. J Card Surg 2011; 26 (01) 22-27
  • 16 Kristensen KL, Rauer LJ, Mortensen PE, Kjeldsen BJ. Reoperation for bleeding in cardiac surgery. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2012; 14 (06) 709-713
  • 17 Elnahal N, Alanwar M. Between hope and risks; insight on delayed sternal closure technique outcomes in adult patients underwent cardiac operations. Zagazig Univ Med J 2018; 24 (Suppl. 02) 93-99
  • 18 Schoonen A, van Klei WA, van Wolfswinkel L, van Loon K. Definitions of low cardiac output syndrome after cardiac surgery and their effect on the incidence of intraoperative LCOS: a literature review and cohort study. Front Cardiovasc Med 2022; 9: 926957
  • 19 Lorusso R, Whitman G, Milojevic M. et al. 2020 EACTS/ELSO/STS/AATS expert consensus on post-cardiotomy extracorporeal life support in adult patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2021; 59 (01) 12-53
  • 20 Westaby S, Balacumaraswami L, Sayeed R. Maximizing survival potential in very high risk cardiac surgery. Heart Fail Clin 2007; 3 (02) 159-180
  • 21 Fukuhara S, Takeda K, Garan AR. et al. Contemporary mechanical circulatory support therapy for postcardiotomy shock. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016; 64 (04) 183-191
  • 22 Algarni KD, Maganti M, Yau TM. Predictors of low cardiac output syndrome after isolated coronary artery bypass surgery: trends over 20 years. Ann Thorac Surg 2011; 92 (05) 1678-1684
  • 23 Li J, Zerdzitzki M, Camboni D. et al. A decade of surgical therapy in an all-comer cohort with type A aortic dissection. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 2021; 62 (04) 377-384
  • 24 Bolliger D, Tanaka KA. Coagulation management strategies in cardiac surgery. Curr Anesthesiol Rep 2017; 7 (03) 265-272
  • 25 Raffa GM, Kowalewski M, Brodie D. et al. Meta-analysis of peripheral or central extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in postcardiotomy and non-postcardiotomy shock. Ann Thorac Surg 2019; 107 (01) 311-321
  • 26 Bolliger D, Mauermann E, Buser A. Preoperative anaemia in cardiac surgery: preoperative assessment, treatment and outcome. Br J Anaesth 2022; 128 (04) 599-602
  • 27 Nammas W, Dalén M, Rosato S. et al. Impact of preoperative thrombocytopenia on the outcome after coronary artery bypass grafting. Platelets 2019; 30 (04) 480-486
  • 28 Camboni D, Schmid C. Komplikationen der venoarteriellen ECMO-Therapie. In: Boeken U, Assmann A, Klotz S, Born F, Rieth A, Schmid C. eds. Mechanische Unterstützung im akuten Kreislaufversagen. Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2020: 135-147
  • 29 Eckardt JL, Wanek MR, Udeh CI. et al. Evaluation of prophylactic antibiotic use for delayed sternal closure after cardiothoracic operation. Ann Thorac Surg 2018; 105 (05) 1365-1369