Am J Perinatol
DOI: 10.1055/a-2589-3709
Original Article

Neonatal and Maternal Outcomes following Shoulder Dystocia Resolution Utilizing ≥ versus < 3 Maneuvers

1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Christiana Care Health System, Newark, Delaware
2   Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
,
Teresa C. Logue
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Christiana Care Health System, Newark, Delaware
,
Daniele Di Mascio
2   Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
,
Giuseppe Rizzo
2   Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
,
Antonella Giancotti
2   Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
,
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Christiana Care Health System, Newark, Delaware
,
Hector Mendez Figueroa
3   Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, McGovern Medical School at The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas
,
Anthony C. Sciscione
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Christiana Care Health System, Newark, Delaware
4   Department of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Delaware Center for Maternal-Fetal Medicine of Christiana Care, Newark, Delaware
,
Suneet P. Chauhan
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Christiana Care Health System, Newark, Delaware
4   Department of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Delaware Center for Maternal-Fetal Medicine of Christiana Care, Newark, Delaware
› Author Affiliations
Funding None.

Abstract

Objective

Most shoulder dystocia (SD) cases do not have associated adverse outcomes. The objective was to assess whether SD relieved with ≥3 maneuvers, compared with fewer, is associated with a higher likelihood of adverse outcomes. The secondary objective was to examine if postpartum hemorrhage is associated with SD managed with ≥3 maneuvers versus fewer.

Study Design

This was a secondary analysis of the assessment of perinatal excellence (APEX) study, an observational cohort of over 115,000 deliveries in 25 U.S. hospitals from 2008 to 2011. We included individuals with singleton, vertex, and nonanomalous fetuses at ≥34 weeks who had SD requiring at least one maneuver. We stratified participants according to if ≥3 maneuvers, versus fewer, were utilized to resolve the SD. The primary outcome was the incidence of a neonatal composite adverse outcome including APGAR <5 at 5 minutes, fetal fractures, intracranial hemorrhage, brachial plexus palsy, facial nerve palsy, hypotension treated, hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, or neonatal death. Using modified-Poisson-regression, we calculated adjusted incidence relative risk (aIRR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Results

The rate of SD in APEX was 1.9% (2,138/118,422). Of 2,138 cases of SD, 96% met the inclusion criteria. ≥3 maneuvers were utilized in 18.9% (391/2,062) of SD cases. The composite neonatal adverse outcome occurred in 8.1% (168/2,062) of cases, and in adjusted models, the risk for the composite outcome was significantly higher with SD requiring ≥3 maneuvers (15.1%) versus <3 maneuvers (6.5%; aIRR: 2.08; 95% CI: 1.50–2.89). Additionally, APGAR <5 at 5 minutes (aIRR: 4.10; 95% CI: 1.18–14.25), neonatal brachial plexus palsy (aIRR: 2.58; 95% CI: 1.45–4.60), and hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (aIRR: 2.83; 95% CI: 1.36 and 5.89) were significantly more likely when ≥3 were used. No significant difference was noted for postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) by number of maneuvers (aIRR: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.44 and 1.21).

Conclusion

SD relieved by ≥3 maneuvers, compared with <3, was associated with a 2-fold-increased risk for the composite neonatal adverse outcome, with no difference in risk for PPH.

Key Points

  • ≥3 Maneuvers increase neonatal adverse outcomes.

  • With ≥3 maneuvers, higher risk of low APGAR and HIE.

  • PPH rates similar for ≥3 versus <3 maneuvers.

Authors' Contributions

Conceptualization: F.Z., T.C.L., M.K.H., A.C.S., H.M.F., and S.P.C.


Data curation: F.Z. and T.C.L.


Formal analysis: F.Z. and D.D.M.


Investigation, methodology, visualization, and writing—original draft: F.Z., M.K.H., and S.P.C.


Resources: F.Z., M.K.H., and A.C.S.


Supervision: S.P.C.


Validation: F.Z. and S.P.C.


Writing—review and editing: F.Z., T.C.L., D.D.M., G.R., A.G., M.K.H., H.M.F., A.C.S., and S.P.C.


Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 27 February 2025

Accepted: 15 April 2025

Accepted Manuscript online:
16 April 2025

Article published online:
08 May 2025

© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Practice bulletin no 178: shoulder dystocia. Obstet Gynecol 2017; 129 (05) e123-e133
  • 2 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Green Top Guidelines. London, UK: RCOG; 2012. . Accessed June 5, 2013 at: https://rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/guidelines/gtg_42.pdf
  • 3 Sentilhes L, Sénat MV, Boulogne AI. et al. Shoulder dystocia: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF). Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2016; 203: 156-161
  • 4 Mendez-Figueroa H, Hoffman MK, Grantz KL, Blackwell SC, Reddy UM, Chauhan SP. Shoulder dystocia and composite adverse outcomes for the maternal-neonatal dyad. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM 2021; 3 (04) 100359
  • 5 Committee on Practice Bulletins-Obstetrics. Practice bulletin no. 183: postpartum hemorrhage. Obstet Gynecol 2017; 130 (04) e168-e186
  • 6 Bailit JL, Grobman WA, McGee P. et al; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Does the presence of a condition-specific obstetric protocol lead to detectable improvements in pregnancy outcomes?. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 213 (01) 86.e1-86.e6
  • 7 Chauhan SP, Laye MR, Lutgendorf M. et al. A multicenter assessment of 1,177 cases of shoulder dystocia: lessons learned. Am J Perinatol 2014; 31 (05) 401-406
  • 8 Chauhan SP, Christian B, Gherman RB, Magann EF, Kaluser CK, Morrison JC. Shoulder dystocia without versus with brachial plexus injury: a case-control study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2007; 20 (04) 313-317
  • 9 Alexander GR, Kogan MD, Himes JH. 1994-1996 U.S. singleton birth weight percentiles for gestational age by race, Hispanic origin, and gender. Matern Child Health J 1999; 3 (04) 225-231
  • 10 von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. STROBE Initiative. The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Int J Surg 2014; 12 (12) 1495-1499
  • 11 Hoffman MK, Bailit JL, Branch DW. et al; Consortium on Safe Labor. A comparison of obstetric maneuvers for the acute management of shoulder dystocia. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 117 (06) 1272-1278
  • 12 Heinonen K, Saisto T, Gissler M, Sarvilinna N. Maternal and neonatal complications of shoulder dystocia with a focus on obstetric maneuvers: a case-control study of 1103 deliveries. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2024; 103 (10) 1965-1974
  • 13 Gherman RB, Ouzounian JG, Satin AJ, Goodwin TM, Phelan JP. A comparison of shoulder dystocia-associated transient and permanent brachial plexus palsies. Obstet Gynecol 2003; 102 (03) 544-548
  • 14 Gherman RB, Goodwin TM, Souter I, Neumann K, Ouzounian JG, Paul RH. The McRoberts' maneuver for the alleviation of shoulder dystocia: how successful is it?. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 176 (03) 656-661
  • 15 Chauhan SP, Cole J, Laye MR. et al. Shoulder dystocia with and without brachial plexus injury: experience from three centers. Am J Perinatol 2007; 24 (06) 365-371
  • 16 Chauhan SP, Rose CH, Gherman RB, Magann EF, Holland MW, Morrison JC. Brachial plexus injury: a 23-year experience from a tertiary center. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 192 (06) 1795-1800 , discussion 1800–1802
  • 17 Elbarbary N, Atre R, Kurian D, Viswanatha R, Ghai V, Ganapathy R. Stratification of outcome of shoulder dystocia according to maneuver used for delivery, retrospective cohort and meta-analysis. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2024; 167 (03) 1160-1167
  • 18 Spain JE, Frey HA, Tuuli MG, Colvin R, Macones GA, Cahill AG. Neonatal morbidity associated with shoulder dystocia maneuvers. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 212 (03) 353.e1-353.e5
  • 19 Lau SL, Sin WTA, Wong L, Lee NMW, Hui SYA, Leung TY. A critical evaluation of the external and internal maneuvers for resolution of shoulder dystocia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2024; 230 (3S): S1027-S1043
  • 20 Rasmussen S, Ebbing C, Baghestan E, Linde LE. Shoulder dystocia by severity in families: a nationwide population study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2024; 103 (10) 1955-1964
  • 21 Bushman ET, Thompson N, Gray M. et al. Influence of estimated fetal weight on labor management. Am J Perinatol 2020; 37 (03) 252-257
  • 22 Peleg D, Warsof S, Wolf MF, Perlitz Y, Shachar IB. Counseling for fetal macrosomia: an estimated fetal weight of 4,000 g is excessively low. Am J Perinatol 2015; 32 (01) 71-74
  • 23 Wagner SM, Bell CS, Gupta M. et al. Interventions to decrease complications after shoulder dystocia: a systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2021; 225 (05) 484.e1-484.e33
  • 24 Habek D, Prka M, Luetić AT, Marton I, Medić F, Miletić AI. Obstetrics injuries during shoulder dystocia in a tertiary perinatal center. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2022; 278: 33-37
  • 25 Narendran LM, Mendez-Figueroa H, Chauhan SP. et al. Predictors of neonatal brachial plexus palsy subsequent to resolution of shoulder dystocia. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2022; 35 (25) 5443-5449
  • 26 Boulvain M, Senat MV, Perrotin F. et al; Groupe de Recherche en Obstétrique et Gynécologie (GROG). Induction of labour versus expectant management for large-for-date fetuses: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2015; 385 (9987) 2600-2605