Facial Plast Surg
DOI: 10.1055/a-2575-3772
Original Article

Structural Rhinoplasty through the Endonasal Approach

Anil Shah
1   Section of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
,
Onyekachi Ezinna Nnabue
1   Section of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Aims and Background

Structural endonasal rhinoplasty, unlike traditional reductive rhinoplasty, achieves aesthetic and functional objectives while maintaining key structural anatomical elements and minimizing complications.

Historical Aspects

Previously, rhinoplasty was performed using primarily reductive techniques that frequently led to poor functional and cosmetic consequences.

Anatomy

Pertinent nasal framework anatomy is reviewed in select highlighted cases.

Technology

Preferred tools/technology are reviewed for each procedure, including the use of ultrasonic devices.

Patient Selection

Indications for each endonasal technique are systematically outlined.

Techniques

The most common techniques are reviewed: dorsal hump reduction, spreader graft placement, alar batten and rim grafts, and columellar strut, and caudal extension grafts.

Postoperative Care

Endonasal rhinoplasty allows for reduced postoperative swelling, loss of nasal tip support, as well as decreased scar tissue/contracture formation.

Conclusion and Clinical Relevance

Structural endonasal techniques continue to evolve and become more refined with studies demonstrating cosmetic and functional outcomes similar to that of open surgery while achieving less operating time, postoperative complications, and long-term complications. As a result, structural endonasal rhinoplasty is an important surgical principle and approach for the modern rhinoplasty surgeon.



Publication History

Article published online:
22 April 2025

© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Fichman M, Piedra Buena IT. Rhinoplasty. In: StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing; 2024. . Accessed December 28, 2024 at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK558970/
  • 2 Gupta R, John J, Ranganathan N. et al. Outcomes of closed versus open rhinoplasty: a systematic review. Arch Plast Surg 2022; 49 (05) 569-579
  • 3 Kiliç C, Tuncel Ü, Cömert E, Şencan Z. Effect of the rhinoplasty technique and lateral osteotomy on periorbital edema and ecchymosis. J Craniofac Surg 2015; 26 (05) e430-e433
  • 4 Finocchi V, Nele G, Çakır B. Dissection, drains and dead space closure: the 3D's to improve patient comfort and reduce early bruising and late fibrosis in rhinoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2020; 44 (05) 1929-1934
  • 5 Adams Jr WP, Rohrich RJ, Hollier LH, Minoli J, Thornton LK, Gyimesi I. Anatomic basis and clinical implications for nasal tip support in open versus closed rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 103 (01) 255-261 , discussion 262–264
  • 6 Ponsky D, Eshraghi Y, Guyuron B. The frequency of surgical maneuvers during open rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 126 (01) 240-244
  • 7 Samra S, Steitz JT, Hajnas N, Toriumi DM. Surgical management of nasal valve collapse. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2018; 51 (05) 929-944
  • 8 Barrett DM, Casanueva F, Wang T. Understanding approaches to the dorsal hump. Facial Plast Surg 2017; 33 (02) 125-132
  • 9 Kanodia R, Shah A. Master Techniques in Facial Rejuvenation E-Book: 2nd edition | Babak Azizzadeh | ISBN: 9780323378260. Elsevier Asia Bookstore. Accessed December 28, 2024 at: https://www.asia.elsevierhealth.com/master-techniques-in-facial-rejuvenation-e-book-9780323378260.html
  • 10 André RF, Paun SH, Vuyk HD. Endonasal spreader graft placement as treatment for internal nasal valve insufficiency: no need to divide the upper lateral cartilages from the septum. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2004; 6 (01) 36-40
  • 11 Talmadge J, High R, Heckman WW. Comparative outcomes in functional rhinoplasty with open vs endonasal spreader graft placement. Ann Plast Surg 2018; 80 (05) 468-471
  • 12 Daniel RK, Palhazi P. The nasal ligaments and tip support in rhinoplasty: an anatomical study. Aesthet Surg J 2018; 38 (04) 357-368
  • 13 Tardy Jr ME, Toriumi D. Alar retraction: composite graft correction. Facial Plast Surg 1989; 6 (02) 101-107
  • 14 Toriumi DM, Josen J, Weinberger M, Tardy Jr ME. Use of alar batten grafts for correction of nasal valve collapse. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997; 123 (08) 802-808
  • 15 Eugene Tardy M, Garner ET. Inspiratory nasal obstruction secondary to alar and nasal valve collapse: technique for repair using autogenous cartilage. Oper Tech Otolaryngol–Head Neck Surg 1990; 1 (03) 215-217
  • 16 Bewick JC, Buchanan MA, Frosh AC. Internal nasal valve incompetence is effectively treated using batten graft functional rhinoplasty. Int J Otolaryngol 2013; 2013: 734795
  • 17 Cervelli V, Spallone D, Bottini JD. et al. Alar batten cartilage graft: treatment of internal and external nasal valve collapse. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2009; 33 (04) 625-634
  • 18 Millman B. Alar batten grafting for management of the collapsed nasal valve. Laryngoscope 2002; 112 (03) 574-579
  • 19 Constantian MB. The boxy nasal tip, the ball tip, and alar cartilage malposition: variations on a theme–a study in 200 consecutive primary and secondary rhinoplasty patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 116 (01) 268-281
  • 20 Troell RJ, Powell NB, Riley RW, Li KK. Evaluation of a new procedure for nasal alar rim and valve collapse: nasal alar rim reconstruction. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000; 122 (02) 204-211
  • 21 Alexander AJ, Shah AR, Constantinides MS. Alar retraction: etiology, treatment, and prevention. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2013; 15 (04) 268-274
  • 22 Guyuron B, Bigdeli Y, Sajjadian A. Dynamics of the alar rim graft. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015; 135 (04) 981-986
  • 23 Scattolin A, D'Ascanio L. Grafts in “closed” rhinoplasty. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 2013; 33 (03) 169-176
  • 24 Shah AR, Miller PJ. Structural approach to endonasal rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg 2006; 22 (01) 55-60
  • 25 Rohrich RJ, Kurkjian TJ, Hoxworth RE, Stephan PJ, Mojallal A. The effect of the columellar strut graft on nasal tip position in primary rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 130 (04) 926-932
  • 26 Harel M, Shir-Az O, Berl A, Pevzner K, Shalom A. Evolution of the septal extension graft in endonasal rhinoplasty: long-term efficacy and reliability. Aesthet Surg J 2022; 42 (12) 1385-1393
  • 27 Toriumi DM. Caudal septal extension graft for correction of the retracted columella. Oper Tech Otolaryngol–Head Neck Surg 1995; 6 (04) 311-318
  • 28 Byrd HS, Andochick S, Copit S, Walton KG. Septal extension grafts: a method of controlling tip projection shape. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997; 100 (04) 999-1010
  • 29 Margulis A, Harel M. Management of severe tip ptosis in closed rhinoplasty: the horizontal columellar strut. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2007; 60 (04) 400-406
  • 30 Bellamy JL, Rohrich RJ. Superiority of the septal extension graft over the columellar strut graft in primary rhinoplasty: improved long-term tip stability. Plast Reconstr Surg 2023; 152 (02) 332-339