Endoscopy 2025; 57(07): 760-766
DOI: 10.1055/a-2534-1164
Innovations and brief communications

Use of artificial intelligence in submucosal vessel detection during third-space endoscopy

1   Internal Medicine III – Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
2   Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), University Hospital of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
,
Robert Mendel
3   Regensburg Medical Image Computing (ReMIC), Ostbayerische Technische Hochschule Regensburg (OTH Regensburg), Regensburg, Germany
,
Anna Muzalyova
1   Internal Medicine III – Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
,
David Rauber
3   Regensburg Medical Image Computing (ReMIC), Ostbayerische Technische Hochschule Regensburg (OTH Regensburg), Regensburg, Germany
,
Andreas Probst
1   Internal Medicine III – Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
2   Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), University Hospital of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
,
Sandra Nagl
1   Internal Medicine III – Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
2   Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), University Hospital of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
,
1   Internal Medicine III – Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
2   Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), University Hospital of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
,
4   Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
,
5   Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
,
Stefan K. Gölder
6   Department of Internal Medicine I – Gastroenterology, Ostalb-Klinikum Aalen, Aalen, Germany
,
Arthur Schmidt
7   Department of Gastroenterology, Robert Bosch Krankenhaus, Stuttgart, Germany
,
Konstantinos Kouladouros
8   Department of Surgery, University Hospital Mannheim, Faculty of Medicine Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
,
Mohamed Abdelhafez
9   Internal Medicine II – Gastroenterology, Hospital rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
,
Benjamin M. Walter
10   Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
,
Michael Meinikheim
1   Internal Medicine III – Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
,
4   Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
,
Christoph Palm
3   Regensburg Medical Image Computing (ReMIC), Ostbayerische Technische Hochschule Regensburg (OTH Regensburg), Regensburg, Germany
11   Regensburg Center of Health Sciences and Technology (RCHST), Ostbayerische Technische Hochschule Regensburg (OTH Regensburg), Regensburg, Germany
,
Helmut Messmann
1   Internal Medicine III – Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
2   Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), University Hospital of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
,
Alanna Ebigbo
1   Internal Medicine III – Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
2   Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), University Hospital of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
› Author Affiliations


Preview

Abstract

Background

While artificial intelligence (AI) shows high potential in decision support for diagnostic gastrointestinal endoscopy, its role in therapeutic endoscopy remains unclear. Third-space endoscopic procedures pose the risk of intraprocedural bleeding. Therefore, we aimed to develop an AI algorithm for intraprocedural blood vessel detection.

Methods

Using a test dataset of 101 standardized video clips containing 200 predefined submucosal blood vessels, 19 endoscopists were evaluated for vessel detection rate (VDR) and time (VDT) with and without support of an AI algorithm. Endoscopists were grouped according to experience in endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Results

With AI support, endoscopist VDR increased from 56.4% (95%CI CI 54.1–58.6) to 72.4% (95%CI CI 70.3–74.4). Endoscopist VDT dropped from 6.7 seconds (95%CI 6.2–7.1) to 5.2 seconds (95%CI 4.8–5.7). False-positive readings appeared in 4.5% of frames and were marked for a significantly shorter time than true positives (0.7 seconds [95%CI 0.55–0.87] vs. 6.0 seconds [95%CI 5.28–6.70]).

Conclusions

AI improved the VDR and VDT of endoscopists during third-space endoscopy. While these data need to be corroborated by clinical trials, AI may prove to be an invaluable tool for improving safety and speed of endoscopic interventions.

Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 24 June 2024

Accepted after revision: 05 February 2025

Accepted Manuscript online:
05 February 2025

Article published online:
14 April 2025

© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany