Endoscopy
DOI: 10.1055/a-2534-1164
Innovations and brief communications

Use of artificial intelligence in submucosal vessel detection during third-space endoscopy

1   Internal Medicine III – Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
2   Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), University Hospital of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
,
Robert Mendel
3   Regensburg Medical Image Computing (ReMIC), Ostbayerische Technische Hochschule Regensburg (OTH Regensburg), Regensburg, Germany
,
Anna Muzalyova
1   Internal Medicine III – Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
,
David Rauber
3   Regensburg Medical Image Computing (ReMIC), Ostbayerische Technische Hochschule Regensburg (OTH Regensburg), Regensburg, Germany
,
Andreas Probst
1   Internal Medicine III – Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
2   Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), University Hospital of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
,
Sandra Nagl
1   Internal Medicine III – Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
2   Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), University Hospital of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
,
1   Internal Medicine III – Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
2   Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), University Hospital of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
,
4   Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
,
5   Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
,
Stefan K. Gölder
6   Department of Internal Medicine I – Gastroenterology, Ostalb-Klinikum Aalen, Aalen, Germany
,
Arthur Schmidt
7   Department of Gastroenterology, Robert Bosch Krankenhaus, Stuttgart, Germany
,
Konstantinos Kouladouros
8   Department of Surgery, University Hospital Mannheim, Faculty of Medicine Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
,
Mohamed Abdelhafez
9   Internal Medicine II – Gastroenterology, Hospital rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
,
Benjamin M. Walter
10   Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
,
Michael Meinikheim
1   Internal Medicine III – Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
,
4   Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
,
Christoph Palm
3   Regensburg Medical Image Computing (ReMIC), Ostbayerische Technische Hochschule Regensburg (OTH Regensburg), Regensburg, Germany
11   Regensburg Center of Health Sciences and Technology (RCHST), Ostbayerische Technische Hochschule Regensburg (OTH Regensburg), Regensburg, Germany
,
Helmut Messmann
1   Internal Medicine III – Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
2   Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), University Hospital of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
,
Alanna Ebigbo
1   Internal Medicine III – Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
2   Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), University Hospital of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
› Author Affiliations


Abstract

Background

While artificial intelligence (AI) shows high potential in decision support for diagnostic gastrointestinal endoscopy, its role in therapeutic endoscopy remains unclear. Third-space endoscopic procedures pose the risk of intraprocedural bleeding. Therefore, we aimed to develop an AI algorithm for intraprocedural blood vessel detection.

Methods

Using a test dataset of 101 standardized video clips containing 200 predefined submucosal blood vessels, 19 endoscopists were evaluated for vessel detection rate (VDR) and time (VDT) with and without support of an AI algorithm. Endoscopists were grouped according to experience in endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Results

With AI support, endoscopist VDR increased from 56.4% (95%CI CI 54.1–58.6) to 72.4% (95%CI CI 70.3–74.4). Endoscopist VDT dropped from 6.7 seconds (95%CI 6.2–7.1) to 5.2 seconds (95%CI 4.8–5.7). False-positive readings appeared in 4.5% of frames and were marked for a significantly shorter time than true positives (0.7 seconds [95%CI 0.55–0.87] vs. 6.0 seconds [95%CI 5.28–6.70]).

Conclusions

AI improved the VDR and VDT of endoscopists during third-space endoscopy. While these data need to be corroborated by clinical trials, AI may prove to be an invaluable tool for improving safety and speed of endoscopic interventions.

Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 24 June 2024

Accepted after revision: 05 February 2025

Accepted Manuscript online:
05 February 2025

Article published online:
14 April 2025

© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 Messmann H, Bisschops R, Antonelli G. et al. Expected value of artificial intelligence in gastrointestinal endoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Position Statement. Endoscopy 2022; 54: 1211-1231
  • 2 Cao J, Yip HC, Chen Y. et al. Intelligent surgical workflow recognition for endoscopic submucosal dissection with real-time animal study. Nat Commun 2023; 14: 6676
  • 3 Furube T, Takeuchi M, Kawakubo H. et al. Automated artificial intelligence-based phase-recognition system for esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2024; 99: 830-838
  • 4 Hassan C, Spadaccini M, Iannone A. et al. Performance of artificial intelligence in colonoscopy for adenoma and polyp detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 93: 77-85.e76
  • 5 Gimeno-García AZ, Hernández DNegrin, Hernández A. et al. Usefulness of a novel computer-aided detection system for colorectal neoplasia: a randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2023; 97: 528-536.e521
  • 6 Wu L, Shang R, Sharma P. et al. Effect of a deep learning-based system on the miss rate of gastric neoplasms during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a single-centre, tandem, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 6: 700-708
  • 7 Ebigbo A, Mendel R, Probst A. et al. Computer-aided diagnosis using deep learning in the evaluation of early oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Gut 2019; 68: 1143-1145
  • 8 Ebigbo A, Mendel R, Ruckert T. et al. Endoscopic prediction of submucosal invasion in Barrett's cancer with the use of artificial intelligence: a pilot study. Endoscopy 2021; 53: 878-883
  • 9 Madani A, Namazi B, Altieri MS. et al. Artificial intelligence for intraoperative guidance: using semantic segmentation to identify surgical anatomy during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg 2022; 276: 363-369
  • 10 Takeuchi M, Collins T, Ndagijimana A. et al. Automatic surgical phase recognition in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair with artificial intelligence. Hernia 2022; 26: 1669-1678
  • 11 Takeuchi M, Collins T, Lipps C. et al. Towards automatic verification of the critical view of the myopectineal orifice with artificial intelligence. Surg Endosc 2023; 37: 4525-4534
  • 12 Komatsu M, Kitaguchi D, Yura M. et al. Automatic surgical phase recognition-based skill assessment in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy using multicenter videos. Gastric Cancer 2024; 27: 187-196
  • 13 Zygomalas A, Kalles D, Katsiakis N. et al. artificial intelligence assisted recognition of anatomical landmarks and laparoscopic instruments in transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair. Surg Innov 2024; 31: 178-184
  • 14 Ebigbo A, Mendel R, Scheppach MW. et al. Vessel and tissue recognition during third-space endoscopy using a deep learning algorithm. Gut 2022; 71: 2388-2390
  • 15 Pimentel-Nunes P, Pioche M, Albéniz E. et al. Curriculum for endoscopic submucosal dissection training in Europe: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Position Statement. Endoscopy 2019; 51: 980-992
  • 16 Hassan C, Wallace MB, Sharma P. et al. New artificial intelligence system: first validation study versus experienced endoscopists for colorectal polyp detection. Gut 2020; 69: 799-800