Pharmacopsychiatry
DOI: 10.1055/a-2529-7029
Original Paper

Regulatory Alignment of Psilocybin Clinical Trials in Major Depressive Disorder on ClinicalTrials.gov: A Cross-Sectional Analysis

Damian Swieczkowski
1   Medical University of Gdansk, Faculty of Pharmacy, Department of Toxicology, Gdansk, Poland
2   Department of Clinical Research and Development, LUXMED Group, Warsaw, Poland
,
Aleksander Kwaśny
3   Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdańsk, Poland
,
Michal Pruc
2   Department of Clinical Research and Development, LUXMED Group, Warsaw, Poland
,
Zuzanna Gaca
2   Department of Clinical Research and Development, LUXMED Group, Warsaw, Poland
,
Lukasz Szarpak
2   Department of Clinical Research and Development, LUXMED Group, Warsaw, Poland
4   Henry JN Taub Department of Emergency Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
5   Research Unit, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Bialystok Oncology Center, Bialystok, Poland
6   Centre for Development, Commercialisation and Technology Transfer, Collegium Medicum, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland
,
Wiesław J. Cubała
3   Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdańsk, Poland
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Introduction

Regulatory compliance is crucial in the clinical development of psychedelic substances, including psilocybin. This study aimed to examine the alignment of clinical trial protocols for psilocybin in the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD) and treatment-resistant depression (TRD) with established regulatory requirements.

Methods

A cross-sectional investigation was conducted on ClinicalTrials.gov using the keywords: “Psilocybin” and “Psilocin” to identify interventional studies with posted trial protocols. Only protocols for MDD and TRD were included. Data extraction focused on key regulatory aspects, including safety, functional unblinding, expectancy bias, and the distribution of investigational medical products.

Results

Eleven psilocybin trial protocols were identified, with four meeting the inclusion criteria. The most commonly studied psilocybin dose was 25 mg. Two trials were double-blind. Although the analyzed protocols superficially adhered to regulatory requirements, there were gaps in addressing potential drug interactions, the acute and chronic concurrent use of antidepressants, and prohibited medications. Certain aspects, such as functional unblinding or expectancy bias, did not share all pathways. Risk mitigation strategies were primarily based on external criteria. Patients with bipolar spectrum disorders or schizoaffective disorders were excluded.

Discussion

This study underscores the importance of conducting clinical trials on psychedelics in strict adherence to regulatory standards. Future research should focus on improving regulatory compliance and exploring the efficacy of psychedelics in broader patient populations.

Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 21 July 2024

Accepted: 17 January 2025

Article published online:
17 April 2025

© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany