Edema, Ecchymosis, and Pain: Classic versus Electric Micro-Saw Osteotomy

Abstract

To compare postoperative edema, ecchymosis, and pain after rhinoplasty using conventional (classical) osteotomy versus powered (electric) micro-saw osteotomy techniques. Between December 2021 and May 2023, 90 patients aged 18 to 45 underwent rhinoplasty at our clinic. Of these, 45 patients underwent lateral and transverse osteotomy with powered saw instruments, whereas 45 underwent conventional osteotomy. A resident examined edema, ecchymosis, and pain on the first, third, and seventh postoperative days. The specialist was blinded to the osteotomy method (single-blind). Edema and ecchymosis were categorized using the Yücel modification of the Kara and Gokalan classification, and the pain was evaluated using the visual analog scale. The patients who underwent osteotomy with an electric micro-saw (group 1) had less edema on the first and third days than with conventional osteotomy (group 2). However, on the seventh day, although group 1 had slightly less edema than group 2, there were no significant differences. On the other hand, group 2 had significantly more ecchymosis on the first and third postoperative days compared with group 1, but there were no significant differences on the seventh day. On the first postoperative days, patients in group 2 reported significantly more pain on average compared with group 1. There were no significant differences in pain levels between the two groups on the third and seventh days following the surgery. After rhinoplasty, patients commonly suffer from edema, ecchymosis, and pain. Our research suggests that using a powered micro-saw effectively reduces early-stage ecchymosis and pain compared with the conventional low-to-low osteotomy technique. However, there were no notable differences between the two methods regarding edema, ecchymosis, and pain on the seventh day after surgery. The electric micro-saw appears to be a feasible alternative in the osteotomy step, showing effectiveness comparable to that of the conventional method.

Keywords

rhinoplasty - osteotomy - micro-saw - edema - ecchymosis

Previous Presentation

This work was presented at the 17th National and 2nd International Facial Plastic Surgery Congress.

Ethics Committee Approval

Ethics committee approval was received for this study from the Local Ethics Committee of Necmettin Erbakan University (approval number: 2021/691) and was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Publication History

Article published online:
18 February 2025

• References

• 1 Whitaker IS, Karoo RO, Spyrou G, Fenton OM. The birth of plastic surgery: the story of nasal reconstruction from the Edwin Smith Papyrus to the twenty-first century. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 120 (01) 327-336
• 2 Koc S, Gürbüzler L, Yaman H. et al. The effectiveness of steroids for edema, ecchymosis, and intraoperative bleeding in rhinoplasty. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2011; 25 (02) e95-e98
• 3 Taskin U, Yigit O, Bilici S, Kuvat SV, Sisman AS, Celebi S. Efficacy of the combination of intraoperative cold saline-soaked gauze compression and corticosteroids on rhinoplasty morbidity. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2011; 144 (05) 698-702
• 4 Yildirim YSS, Seneldir S, Cetiner H. The comparison of conventional osteotomes and magic saws in terms of edema and ecchymosis after rhinoplasty. J Craniofac Surg 2022; 33 (01) e4-e8
• 5 Ong AA, Farhood Z, Kyle AR, Patel KG. Interventions to decrease postoperative edema and ecchymosis after rhinoplasty: a systematic review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 137 (05) 1448-1462
• 6 Kara CO, Gökalan I. Effects of single-dose steroid usage on edema, ecchymosis, and intraoperative bleeding in rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 104 (07) 2213-2218
• 7 Yücel OT. Which type of osteotomy for edema and ecchymosis: external or internal?. Ann Plast Surg 2005; 55 (06) 587-590
• 8 Mehdizadeh M, Ghassemi A, Khakzad M. et al. Comparison of the effect of dexamethasone and tranexamic acid, separately or in combination on post-rhinoplasty edema and ecchymosis. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2018; 42 (01) 246-252
• 9 Caglar E, Celebi S, Topak M, Develioglu NO, Yalcin E, Kulekci M. How can periorbital oedema and ecchymose be reduced in rhinoplasty?. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2016; 273 (09) 2549-2554
• 10 Cakir B, Oreroğlu AR, Doğan T, Akan M. A complete subperichondrial dissection technique for rhinoplasty with management of the nasal ligaments. Aesthet Surg J 2012; 32 (05) 564-574
• 11 Avşar Y. Nasal hump reduction with powered micro saw osteotomy. Aesthet Surg J 2009; 29 (01) 6-11
• 12 Avsar Y. The oscillating micro-saw: a safe and pliable instrument for transverse osteotomy in rhinoplasty. Aesthet Surg J 2012; 32 (06) 700-708
• 13 Szychta P, Antoszewski B. Assessment of early post-operative pain following septorhinoplasty. J Laryngol Rhinol Otol 2010; 124 (11) 1194-1199
• 14 Mirza AA, Alandejani TA, Al-Sayed AA. Piezosurgery versus conventional osteotomy in rhinoplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Laryngoscope 2020; 130 (05) 1158-1165
• 15 Koc B, Koc EA, Erbek S. Comparison of clinical outcomes using a piezosurgery device vs. a conventional osteotome for lateral osteotomy in rhinoplasty. Ear Nose Throat J 2017; 96 (08) 318-326
• 16 Fallahi HR, Keyhan SO, Fattahi T, Mohiti AK. Comparison of piezosurgery and conventional osteotomy post rhinoplasty morbidities: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2019; 77 (05) 1050-1055
• 17 Pamuk G, Pamuk AE, Kandemir S. Powered micro-saw versus conventional osteotome for septorhinoplasty: a prospective, double-blind, comparative study. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2023; 47 (03) 1133-1141