Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-2511-9184
Outcomes and Complications of Chait Trapdoor Cecostomy in Pediatric Patients with Therapy-Resistant Constipation and Fecal Incontinence: A 14-Year Retrospective Study
Funding This research was funded by the Hartwig Foundation.

Abstract
Aim of the Study To assess the incidence and types of complications and patient-reported outcomes in pediatric patients with therapy-resistant constipation or fecal incontinence (FI) without constipation who underwent Chait Trapdoor™ cecostomy (CTC). The findings contribute to the discussion on selecting the optimal antegrade continence (ACE) procedure for this population.
Materials and Methods A retrospective review was conducted on all pediatric patients with therapy-resistant constipation or FI without constipation who underwent a CTC procedure at our tertiary referral center between 2009 and 2023. Postoperative complications were classified using the Clavien-Madadi classification. At their most recent follow-up in 2023, patients reported satisfaction with their CTC.
Results The study included 62 children (median age 12 years [IQR 8–14; range 1–17], 42% male), with a median follow-up of 4 years (IQR 2–8, range 0–14). Underlying diagnoses were functional constipation (n = 39, 63%), spina bifida (n = 11, 18%), and anorectal malformations (n = 5, 8%). A total of 49/62 patients (79%) experienced 89 CTC-related complications. Minor complications (Clavien-Madadi I–II) affected 29 patients (47%) and most commonly included granulation. Major complications (Clavien-Madadi III–IV) requiring surgery occurred in 32% of patients. Despite these complications, 40/62 (65%) patients reported satisfaction with their CTC, as determined by partial or complete symptom resolution.
Conclusions Although complications were common, 65% of the patients reported satisfaction with their CTC. These findings emphasize the need for thorough patient selection, informed counseling on potential risks, and individualized management strategies to enhance outcomes.
Keywords
pediatrics - fecal incontinence - constipation - Chait Trapdoor cecostomy - antegrade continence enemaPublication History
Received: 17 July 2024
Accepted: 07 January 2025
Accepted Manuscript online:
09 January 2025
Article published online:
14 February 2025
© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1
Koppen IJN,
Vriesman MH,
Saps M.
et al.
Prevalence of functional defecation disorders in children: a systematic review and
meta-analysis. J Pediatr 2018; 198: 121-130.e6
MissingFormLabel
- 2
Tabbers MM,
DiLorenzo C,
Berger MY.
et al;
European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition,
North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology.
Evaluation and treatment of functional constipation in infants and children: evidence-based
recommendations from ESPGHAN and NASPGHAN. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2014; 58 (02)
258-274
MissingFormLabel
- 3
Siminas S,
Losty PD.
Current surgical management of pediatric idiopathic constipation: a systematic review
of published studies. Ann Surg 2015; 262 (06) 925-933
MissingFormLabel
- 4
Malone PS,
Ransley PG,
Kiely EM.
Preliminary report: the antegrade continence enema. Lancet 1990; 336 (8725): 1217-1218
MissingFormLabel
- 5
Shandling B,
Chait PG,
Richards HF.
Percutaneous cecostomy: a new technique in the management of fecal incontinence. J
Pediatr Surg 1996; 31 (04) 534-537
MissingFormLabel
- 6
Abildgaard HA,
Børgager M,
Ellebæk MB,
Qvist N.
Ileal neoappendicostomy for antegrade colonic enema (ACE) in the treatment of fecal
incontinence and chronic constipation: a systematic review. Tech Coloproctol 2021;
25 (08) 915-921
MissingFormLabel
- 7
Ahn SM,
Han SW,
Choi SH.
The results of antegrade continence enema using a retubularized sigmoidostomy. Pediatr
Surg Int 2004; 20 (07) 488-491
MissingFormLabel
- 8
Kelly MS.
Malone antegrade continence enemas vs. cecostomy vs. transanal irrigation—what is
new and how do we counsel our patients?. Curr Urol Rep 2019; 20 (08) 41
MissingFormLabel
- 9
Halleran DR,
Vilanova-Sanchez A,
Rentea RM.
et al.
A comparison of Malone appendicostomy and cecostomy for antegrade access as adjuncts
to a bowel management program for patients with functional constipation or fecal incontinence.
J Pediatr Surg 2019; 54 (01) 123-128
MissingFormLabel
- 10
Marshall J,
Hutson JM,
Anticich N,
Stanton MP.
Antegrade continence enemas in the treatment of slow-transit constipation. J Pediatr
Surg 2001; 36 (08) 1227-1230
MissingFormLabel
- 11
Hoekstra LT,
Kuijper CF,
Bakx R,
Heij HA,
Aronson DC,
Benninga MA.
The Malone antegrade continence enema procedure: the Amsterdam experience. J Pediatr
Surg 2011; 46 (08) 1603-1608
MissingFormLabel
- 12
Vriesman MH,
Koppen IJN,
Camilleri M,
Di Lorenzo C,
Benninga MA.
Management of functional constipation in children and adults. Nat Rev Gastroenterol
Hepatol 2020; 17 (01) 21-39
MissingFormLabel
- 13
Knaus ME,
Lu PL,
Lu A.
et al.
Antegrade continence enemas in children with functional constipation and dyssynergic
defecation: go or no go?. J Pediatr Surg 2022; 57 (08) 1672-1675
MissingFormLabel
- 14
Christison-Lagay ER,
Rodriguez L,
Kurtz M,
St Pierre K,
Doody DP,
Goldstein AM.
Antegrade colonic enemas and intestinal diversion are highly effective in the management
of children with intractable constipation. J Pediatr Surg 2010; 45 (01) 213-219 ,
discussion 219
MissingFormLabel
- 15
Reppucci ML,
Nolan MM,
Cooper E.
et al.
The success rate of antegrade enemas for the management of idiopathic constipation.
Pediatr Surg Int 2022; 38 (12) 1729-1736
MissingFormLabel
- 16 Available at: https://data.castoredc.com/studies/YkxpjCV7Kv4kFuw2Aby9ha/participants
MissingFormLabel
- 17
Madadi-Sanjani O,
Kuebler JF,
Brendel J.
et al.
Implementation and validation of a novel instrument for the grading of unexpected
events in paediatric surgery: Clavien-Madadi classification. Br J Surg 2023; 110 (05)
576-583
MissingFormLabel
- 18
Madadi-Sanjani O,
Kuebler JF,
Brendel J.
et al.
Validation of the Clavien-Madadi classification for unexpected events in pediatric
surgery: a collaborative ERNICA project. J Pediatr Surg 2024; 59 (09) 1672-1679
MissingFormLabel
- 19
Mousa HM,
van den Berg MM,
Caniano DA,
Hogan M,
Di Lorenzo C,
Hayes J.
Cecostomy in children with defecation disorders. Dig Dis Sci 2006; 51 (01) 154-160
MissingFormLabel
- 20
Bevill MD,
Bonnett K,
Arlen A,
Cooper C,
Baxter C,
Storm DW.
Outcomes and satisfaction in pediatric patients with Chait cecostomy tubes. J Pediatr
Urol 2017; 13 (04) 365-370
MissingFormLabel
- 21
Donkol RH,
Al-Nammi A.
Percutaneous cecostomy in the management of organic fecal incontinence in children.
World J Radiol 2010; 2 (12) 463-467
MissingFormLabel
- 22
Baaleman DF,
Vriesman MH,
Lu PL.
et al.
Long-term outcomes of antegrade continence enemas to treat constipation and fecal
incontinence in children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2023; 77 (02) 191-197
MissingFormLabel
- 23
Steiner SA,
Torres MR,
Penna FJ.
et al.
Chronic functional constipation in children: adherence and factors associated with
drug treatment. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2014; 58 (05) 598-602
MissingFormLabel
- 24
Basson S,
Zani A,
McDowell S.
et al.
Antegrade continence enema (ACE): predictors of outcome in 111 patients. Pediatr Surg
Int 2014; 30 (11) 1135-1141
MissingFormLabel
- 25
Mosiello G,
Marshall D,
Rolle U.
et al.
Consensus review of best practice of transanal irrigation in children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol
Nutr 2017; 64 (03) 343-352
MissingFormLabel