Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-2491-4269
Social Determinants of Health Associated with Intimate Partner Violence in an Urban Obstetric Population
Funding This study was funded by the NIH-University of Cincinnati Medical Student Summer Research Program (grant no.: T35DK060444)

Abstract
Objective
Intimate partner violence (IPV) is pervasive and can lead to severe health consequences. In the United States, 25% of women have experienced sexual violence, physical violence, and/or stalking by an intimate partner. However, less is known about the frequency and risk factors for IPV in the obstetric population.
Study Design
Nested case–control study from a prospective cohort study of 606 parturients at a single academic medical center from 2011 to 2022. Structured questionnaires were administered to randomly chosen, consented patients during their postpartum hospital stay to gather information on social determinants of health (SDoH) and birth outcomes. The case group included participants who reported forced sex causing pregnancy, verbal abuse before or during pregnancy, or physical abuse during pregnancy. The control group reported none of these. Odds ratios were used to quantify the relationship between IPV and maternal sociodemographic characteristics, pregnancy factors, and levels of perceived support and discrimination.
Results
Of 606 study participants, 568 (94%) provided data on IPV. Of those, 20.4% reported IPV (case) and 80.6% reported no IPV (control). In total, 74.6% of the study population was enrolled prepandemic. Unmarried status, low income, food insecurity, housing insecurity, substance use during pregnancy, higher gravidity, unintended pregnancy, low social support, and racial and gender discrimination were all significantly associated with IPV; maternal race and pregnancy during the COVID-19 pandemic were not.
Conclusion
IPV is common, reported by one in five parturients in our population. Although maternal race was not associated with IPV in this perinatal cohort, experiencing racism was. Initiatives aimed to address SDoH such as substance use, family planning, and access to food and housing remain key opportunities to support pregnant patients experiencing IPV. The connection between perceived discrimination and IPV found here highlights the importance of addressing the influence of racism and gender-based discrimination on adverse birth outcomes in the United States.
Key Points
-
One in five parturients disclosed IPV.
-
Racial discrimination was correlated with IPV.
-
Food and housing insecurity increase IPV risk.
-
COVID-19 did not increase the rate of IPV.
-
Psychosocial support is vital during pregnancy.
Keywords
COVID-19 - discrimination - intimate partner violence - IPV - pandemic - perinatal - pregnancy - racismPublication History
Received: 26 August 2024
Accepted: 28 November 2024
Accepted Manuscript online:
29 November 2024
Article published online:
28 December 2024
© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1 World Health Organization. Violence against women prevalence estimates, 2018. global, regional and national prevalence estimates for intimate partner violence against women and global and regional prevalence estimates for non-partner sexual violence against women. Executive summary. 2021
- 2 World Health Organization. Violence against women. 2022 . Accessed July 12, 2024 at: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/violence-against-women
- 3 Donovan BM, Spracklen CN, Schweizer ML, Ryckman KK, Saftlas AF. Intimate partner violence during pregnancy and the risk for adverse infant outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG 2016; 123 (08) 1289-1299
- 4 Alhusen JL, Ray E, Sharps P, Bullock L. Intimate partner violence during pregnancy: maternal and neonatal outcomes. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2015; 24 (01) 100-106
- 5 Drexler KA, Quist-Nelson J, Weil AB. Intimate partner violence and trauma-informed care in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM 2022; 4 (02) 100542
- 6 James L, Brody D, Hamilton Z. Risk factors for domestic violence during pregnancy: a meta-analytic review. Violence Vict 2013; 28 (03) 359-380
- 7 World Health Organization. Social determinants of health. 2022 . Accessed July 12, 2022 at: https://www.who.int/health-topics/social-determinants-of-health#tab=tab_1
- 8 Thiel F, Büechl VCS, Rehberg F. et al. Changes in prevalence and severity of domestic violence during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review. Front Psychiatry 2022; 13: 874183
- 9 Wood SN, Yirgu R, Wondimagegnehu A. et al. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on intimate partner violence during pregnancy: evidence from a multimethods study of recently pregnant women in Ethiopia. BMJ Open 2022; 12 (04) e055790
- 10 Sullivan K, St John M, DeFranco E, Kelly E. Food insecurity in an urban pregnancy cohort. Am J Perinatol 2023; 40 (01) 57-61
- 11 Masho SW, Rozario SS, Ferrance JL. Intimate partner violence around the time of pregnancy and utilization of WIC services. Matern Child Health J 2019; 23 (12) 1648-1657
- 12 Robinson SR, Maxwell D, Williams JR. Qualitative, interpretive metasynthesis of women's experiences of intimate partner violence during pregnancy. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2019; 48 (06) 604-614
- 13 García-Moreno C, Pallitto C, Devries K, Stöckl H, Watts C, Abrahams N. Global and regional estimates of violence against women. prevalence and health effects of intimate partner violence and non-partner sexual violence. 2013. . Accessed July 12, 2024 at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241564625
- 14 Ely D, Driscoll A. Infant mortality in the United States, 2018. Data From the Period Linked Birth/Infant Death File. National Vital Statistics Reports; 2018. ;69:18