RSS-Feed abonnieren
DOI: 10.1055/a-2457-2781
Continuous versus Intermittent Blood Pressure Monitoring in Postpartum Preeclampsia with Severe Features
Funding This study was supported by a grant from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute for Child Health and Development (R21HD110992). N.P. is supported by the NIH/NINDS (K23NS110980).

Abstract
Objective
In this study, we piloted the use of continuous 24-hour blood pressure (BP) monitoring in postpartum patients with preeclampsia with severe features.
Study Design
We measured continuous BP for up to 24 hours using finger plethysmography. We also used an oscillometric device to measure brachial BP per usual clinical protocol (intermittent BP) during the same monitoring period. Using a paired t-test, we compared mean BP values assessed using intermittent and continuous methods, and using McNemar's test, we compared the proportion of patients with sustained severe-range BP using each BP measurement method.
Results
A total of 25 patients were included in this study. There was no difference in mean systolic BP (SBP) and mean arterial pressure between intermittent and continuous BP measurements. Intermittently recorded mean diastolic BP (DBP) was significantly higher than continuously recorded DBP. Eleven participants (44%) had sustained SBP ≥160 mm Hg using continuous monitoring compared with two using intermittent monitoring (p = 0.003). Of these 11 participants, 3 (37%) also recorded sustained DBP ≥110 mm Hg using continuous monitoring compared with none using intermittent monitoring.
Conclusion
Continuous BP monitoring is a feasible and reliable method for detecting sustained severe-range BP in postpartum patients receiving treatment for preeclampsia with severe features.
Key Points
-
Postpartum continuous BP monitoring is feasible.
-
Continuous BP detects more sustained severe BP.
-
Continuous BP may be a reliable BP method.
Note
Findings were presented as a poster for the Society of OB/GYN Hospitalists' 14th Annual Clinical Meeting in Denver, CO, September 7–11, 2024.
Publikationsverlauf
Eingereicht: 15. Oktober 2024
Angenommen: 29. Oktober 2024
Accepted Manuscript online:
01. November 2024
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
25. November 2024
© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Gestational hypertension and preeclampsia: ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 222. Obstet Gynecol 2020; 135 (06) e237-e260
- 2 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Safe Motherhood Initiative: Severe Hypertension. Accessed July 2, 2024 at: https://www.acog.org/community/districts-and-sections/district-ii/programs-and-resources/safe-motherhood-initiative/severe-hypertension
- 3 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Committee Opinion No. 623: Emergent therapy for acute-onset, severe hypertension during pregnancy and the postpartum period. Obstet Gynecol 2015; 125 (02) 521-525
- 4 Ackerman-Banks CM, Bhinder J, Eder M. et al. Continuous non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring in early onset severe preeclampsia. Pregnancy Hypertens 2023; 34: 27-32
- 5 Akkermans J, Diepeveen M, Ganzevoort W, van Montfrans GA, Westerhof BE, Wolf H. Continuous non-invasive blood pressure monitoring, a validation study of Nexfin in a pregnant population. Hypertens Pregnancy 2009; 28 (02) 230-242