Am J Perinatol 2025; 42(10): 1366-1370
DOI: 10.1055/a-2457-2781
Short Communication

Continuous versus Intermittent Blood Pressure Monitoring in Postpartum Preeclampsia with Severe Features

Helen Woolcock Martinez
1   Division of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Disease, Department of Neurology, Columbia University, New York, New York
,
Noora Haghighi
1   Division of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Disease, Department of Neurology, Columbia University, New York, New York
,
Anne-Sophie van Wingerden
1   Division of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Disease, Department of Neurology, Columbia University, New York, New York
,
Michael Kirschner
1   Division of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Disease, Department of Neurology, Columbia University, New York, New York
,
2   Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University, New York, New York
,
Natalie A. Bello
3   Department of Cardiology, Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
,
Nils Petersen
4   Department of Neurology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
,
Eliza C. Miller
1   Division of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Disease, Department of Neurology, Columbia University, New York, New York
› Institutsangaben

Funding This study was supported by a grant from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute for Child Health and Development (R21HD110992). N.P. is supported by the NIH/NINDS (K23NS110980).
Preview

Abstract

Objective

In this study, we piloted the use of continuous 24-hour blood pressure (BP) monitoring in postpartum patients with preeclampsia with severe features.

Study Design

We measured continuous BP for up to 24 hours using finger plethysmography. We also used an oscillometric device to measure brachial BP per usual clinical protocol (intermittent BP) during the same monitoring period. Using a paired t-test, we compared mean BP values assessed using intermittent and continuous methods, and using McNemar's test, we compared the proportion of patients with sustained severe-range BP using each BP measurement method.

Results

A total of 25 patients were included in this study. There was no difference in mean systolic BP (SBP) and mean arterial pressure between intermittent and continuous BP measurements. Intermittently recorded mean diastolic BP (DBP) was significantly higher than continuously recorded DBP. Eleven participants (44%) had sustained SBP ≥160 mm Hg using continuous monitoring compared with two using intermittent monitoring (p = 0.003). Of these 11 participants, 3 (37%) also recorded sustained DBP ≥110 mm Hg using continuous monitoring compared with none using intermittent monitoring.

Conclusion

Continuous BP monitoring is a feasible and reliable method for detecting sustained severe-range BP in postpartum patients receiving treatment for preeclampsia with severe features.

Key Points

  • Postpartum continuous BP monitoring is feasible.

  • Continuous BP detects more sustained severe BP.

  • Continuous BP may be a reliable BP method.

Note

Findings were presented as a poster for the Society of OB/GYN Hospitalists' 14th Annual Clinical Meeting in Denver, CO, September 7–11, 2024.




Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 15. Oktober 2024

Angenommen: 29. Oktober 2024

Accepted Manuscript online:
01. November 2024

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
25. November 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA