Abstract
Objective This study aimed to compare the clinical endotracheal tube (ETT) depth after initial
stabilization of infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) to weight and
gestational age-based depth estimates.
Study Design This retrospective analysis included 58 inborn infants with left-sided CDH. We compared
a standard anatomic ETT depth calculated from initial chest radiographs and the clinical
depth of the ETT after adjustments to predicted depths using weight and gestational
age-based estimates.
Results The standard anatomic depth was deeper than age (standard deviation 1.29 ± 1.15 cm,
p < 0.001) and weight-based (standard deviation 0.59 ± 0.95 cm, p < 0.001) estimates. The clinical ETT depth was also deeper than age (standard deviation
1.01 ± 0.77 cm, p < 0.001) and weight-based (standard deviation 0.26 ± 0.50 cm, p < 0.001) estimates.
Conclusion Established strategies to predict ETT depth underestimate the ideal depth in infants
with left-sided CDH. These data suggest utilizing caution during initial ETT placement
based on standard depth estimates for patients with CDH.
Key Points
-
CDH patients present unique stabilization challenges.
-
Standard ETT depth estimates are too shallow.
-
Resuscitation teams should cautiously choose ETT depth.
Keywords
congenital diaphragmatic hernia - endotracheal tube - intubation - neonate - resuscitation