PDF icon Download PDF
J Knee Surg 2024; 37(09): 623-630
DOI: 10.1055/a-2232-4971
Original Article

Biomechanical Comparison of Uniplanar versus Biplanar Lateral Opening-wedge Distal Femoral Osteotomy Techniques in Terms of Risk for Medial Hinge Fracture

Cem Yıldırım
1   Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Basaksehir Cam and Sakura City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
,
Mehmet Demirel
2   Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, İstanbul University, Istanbul School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
,
Mehmet Ekinci
3   Department of Orthopedic and Traumatology, Haseki Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
,
Simge Öztürk
4   Mechanical Engineering Faculty, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey
,
Süreyya Ergün Bozdağ
4   Mechanical Engineering Faculty, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey
› Author Affiliations
Funding None.
› Further Information
   Permissions and Reprints
Preview

Abstract

The effect of osteotomy type on the initial stiffness of the bone-implant construct in lateral opening-wedge distal femoral osteotomy (LOWDFO) using a uniplanar compared with a biplanar technique has been investigated. However, no study has explored the biomechanical risk factors for medial hinge fracture. This study aimed to compare the biomechanical strength of uniplanar versus biplanar LOWDFO regarding the risk for medial hinge fracture during gap opening. Twelve composite femora were divided into two groups (six in each group) based on the distal femoral osteotomy technique: uniplanar versus biplanar LOWDFO. All LOWDFO models were subjected to incremental static loading. The gap distance was expanded by 1 mm, and displacement values were recorded as anterior and posterior gap distances (mm). The average force values of all samples at certain gap distances were recorded, and the head distance was measured. The uniplanar group had higher load values than the biplanar group at all anterior gap distances. These differences were only significant at 2- and 3-mm gap distances (p = 0.025 and 0.037). At all posterior gap distances, the uniplanar group had higher load values than the biplanar group, but these differences only reached statistical significance at 2 mm (p = 0.037). Both groups had similar anterior, posterior, and average gap distances (p = 0.75, 0.522, 0.873). The uniplanar group had a higher head insertion distance (15.3 ± 5.7) than the biplanar group (14.7 ± 2.9), but it was not significant (p = 0.87). The uniplanar group had a lower average load before medial hinge fracture (46.41 ± 13.91 N) than the biplanar group (54.92 ± 31.94, p = 0.81). The biplanar group had an average maximum load value of 64.18 ± 25.6 N, while the uniplanar group had 57.90 ± 12.21 N (p = 0.81). This study revealed that the biplanar osteotomy technique allows a wider opening wedge gap with less risk of a medial hinge fracture than uniplanar LOWDFO.

Level of evidence was level 3, case–control series.

Keywords

lateral opening-wedge osteotomy - uniplanar osteotomy - biplanar osteotomy - medial hinge fracture

Ethical Approval

Not applicable for biomechanical studies.


Informed Consent

Not applicable for biomechanical studies.


Authors' Contributions

C.Y.: Conceptualization; Data curation; Methodology; Investigation; Supervision


M.D.: Validation; Writing—original draft


M.E.: Methodology; Formal analysis; Writing—original draft


S.Ö.: Formal analysis; Supervision; Validation;


S.E.B.: Supervision; Validation; Writing—review and editing




Publication History

Received: 07 August 2023

Accepted: 18 December 2023

Accepted Manuscript online:
19 December 2023

Article published online:
27 February 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA