Download PDF
J Knee Surg
DOI: 10.1055/a-2232-4971
Original Article

Biomechanical Comparison of Uniplanar versus Biplanar Lateral Opening-wedge Distal Femoral Osteotomy Techniques in Terms of Risk for Medial Hinge Fracture

Cem Yıldırım
1   Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Basaksehir Cam and Sakura City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
,
Mehmet Demirel
2   Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, İstanbul University, Istanbul School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
,
Mehmet Ekinci
3   Department of Orthopedic and Traumatology, Haseki Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
,
Simge Öztürk
4   Mechanical Engineering Faculty, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey
,
Süreyya Ergün Bozdağ
4   Mechanical Engineering Faculty, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey
› Author Affiliations Funding None.
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

The effect of osteotomy type on the initial stiffness of the bone-implant construct in lateral opening-wedge distal femoral osteotomy (LOWDFO) using a uniplanar compared with a biplanar technique has been investigated. However, no study has explored the biomechanical risk factors for medial hinge fracture. This study aimed to compare the biomechanical strength of uniplanar versus biplanar LOWDFO regarding the risk for medial hinge fracture during gap opening. Twelve composite femora were divided into two groups (six in each group) based on the distal femoral osteotomy technique: uniplanar versus biplanar LOWDFO. All LOWDFO models were subjected to incremental static loading. The gap distance was expanded by 1 mm, and displacement values were recorded as anterior and posterior gap distances (mm). The average force values of all samples at certain gap distances were recorded, and the head distance was measured. The uniplanar group had higher load values than the biplanar group at all anterior gap distances. These differences were only significant at 2- and 3-mm gap distances (p = 0.025 and 0.037). At all posterior gap distances, the uniplanar group had higher load values than the biplanar group, but these differences only reached statistical significance at 2 mm (p = 0.037). Both groups had similar anterior, posterior, and average gap distances (p = 0.75, 0.522, 0.873). The uniplanar group had a higher head insertion distance (15.3 ± 5.7) than the biplanar group (14.7 ± 2.9), but it was not significant (p = 0.87). The uniplanar group had a lower average load before medial hinge fracture (46.41 ± 13.91 N) than the biplanar group (54.92 ± 31.94, p = 0.81). The biplanar group had an average maximum load value of 64.18 ± 25.6 N, while the uniplanar group had 57.90 ± 12.21 N (p = 0.81). This study revealed that the biplanar osteotomy technique allows a wider opening wedge gap with less risk of a medial hinge fracture than uniplanar LOWDFO.

Level of evidence was level 3, case–control series.

Keywords

lateral opening-wedge osteotomy - uniplanar osteotomy - biplanar osteotomy - medial hinge fracture

Ethical Approval

Not applicable for biomechanical studies.


Informed Consent

Not applicable for biomechanical studies.


Authors' Contributions

C.Y.: Conceptualization; Data curation; Methodology; Investigation; Supervision


M.D.: Validation; Writing—original draft


M.E.: Methodology; Formal analysis; Writing—original draft


S.Ö.: Formal analysis; Supervision; Validation;


S.E.B.: Supervision; Validation; Writing—review and editing




Publication History

Received: 07 August 2023

Accepted: 18 December 2023

Accepted Manuscript online:
19 December 2023

Article published online:
27 February 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Rosso F, Margheritini F. Distal femoral osteotomy. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2014; 7 (04) 302-311
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Pilone C, Rosso F, Cottino U, Rossi R, Bonasia DE. Lateral opening wedge distal femoral osteotomy for lateral compartment arthrosis/overload. Clin Sports Med 2019; 38 (03) 351-359
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Bonasia DE, Dettoni F, Sito G. et al. Medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy for medial compartment overload/arthritis in the varus knee: prognostic factors. Am J Sports Med 2014; 42 (03) 690-698
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Wylie JD, Jones DL, Hartley MK. et al. Distal femoral osteotomy for the valgus knee: medial closing wedge versus lateral opening wedge: a systematic review. Arthroscopy 2016; 32 (10) 2141-2147
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Pietsch M, Hochegger M, Winkler M, Sandriesser S, Freude T, Augat P. Opening-wedge osteotomies of the distal femur: minor advantages for a biplanar compared to a uniplanar technique. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2019; 27 (07) 2375-2384
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Cameron JI, McCauley JC, Kermanshahi AY, Bugbee WD. Lateral opening-wedge distal femoral osteotomy: pain relief, functional improvement, and survivorship at 5 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015; 473 (06) 2009-2015
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 van Heerwaarden R, Najfeld M, Brinkman M, Seil R, Madry H, Pape D. Wedge volume and osteotomy surface depend on surgical technique for distal femoral osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2013; 21 (01) 206-212
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Türkmen F, Kaçıra BK, Özkaya M. et al. Comparison of monoplanar versus biplanar medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy techniques for preventing lateral cortex fracture. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2017; 25 (09) 2914-2920
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Rho J-Y, Tsui TY, Pharr GM. Elastic properties of human cortical and trabecular lamellar bone measured by nanoindentation. Biomaterials 1997; 18 (20) 1325-1330
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Agneskirchner JD, Freiling D, Hurschler C, Lobenhoffer P. Primary stability of four different implants for opening wedge high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2006; 14 (03) 291-300
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Liska F, Voss A, Imhoff FB, Willinger L, Imhoff AB. Nonunion and delayed union in lateral open wedge distal femoral osteotomies-a legitimate concern?. Int Orthop 2018; 42 (01) 9-15
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Winkler PW, Rupp MC, Lutz PM. et al. A hinge position distal to the adductor tubercle minimizes the risk of hinge fractures in lateral open wedge distal femoral osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2021; 29 (10) 3382-3391
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Jacobi M, Wahl P, Bouaicha S, Jakob RP, Gautier E. Distal femoral varus osteotomy: problems associated with the lateral open-wedge technique. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2011; 131 (06) 725-728
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Saithna A, Kundra R, Getgood A, Spalding T. Opening wedge distal femoral varus osteotomy for lateral compartment osteoarthritis in the valgus knee. Knee 2014; 21 (01) 172-175
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Ekeland A, Nerhus TK, Dimmen S, Heir S. Good functional results of distal femoral opening-wedge osteotomy of knees with lateral osteoarthritis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2016; 24 (05) 1702-1709
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Rupp MC, Winkler PW, Lutz PM. et al. Dislocated hinge fractures are associated with malunion after lateral closing wedge distal femoral osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2022; 30 (03) 982-992
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Edgerton BC, Mariani EM, Morrey BF. Distal femoral varus osteotomy for painful genu valgum. A five-to-11-year follow-up study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1993; (288) 263-269
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Duerr RA, Harangody S, Magnussen RA, Kaeding CC, Flanigan DC. Technique for Biplanar lateral opening wedge distal femoral osteotomy in the valgus knee. Arthrosc Tech 2020; 9 (09) e1323-e1333
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Mitchell JJ, Dean CS, Chahla J, Moatshe G, Cram TR, LaPrade RF. Varus-producing lateral distal femoral opening-wedge osteotomy. Arthrosc Tech 2016; 5 (04) e799-e807
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 O'Malley MP, Pareek A, Reardon PJ, Stuart MJ, Krych AJ. Distal femoral osteotomy: lateral opening wedge technique. Arthrosc Tech 2016; 5 (04) e725-e730
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Takeuchi R, Ishikawa H, Kumagai K. et al. Fractures around the lateral cortical hinge after a medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy: a new classification of lateral hinge fracture. Arthroscopy 2012; 28 (01) 85-94
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar