Dedicated to 60 years of Donald Matteson’s boron homologation
Key words
boron - hydride abstraction - amines - iminium - functionalization
1
Introduction
Organoboranes are widely used as reagents and building blocks in synthetic chemistry.
For example, hydroboranes and borohydrides are often used in reduction chemistry,
whereas boronic acids are commonly employed in cross-coupling processes.[1]
[2] The use of organoboranes as catalysts has also received significant attention whereby
the interaction of the Lewis acidic boron atom with a pair of non-bonding electrons
or π-electron pairs is employed to activate the substrate.[3–5] Recent attention has focused on more electron-deficient organoboranes, such as B(C6F5)3, in catalysis. These more Lewis acidic species can also interact with σ(C–H) bonds,
resulting in hydride abstraction and the formation of a formal carbocation and a borohydride
counterion.[6]
[7]
[8] When the C–H-bearing substrate is a cyclohexadiene, Wheland-type intermediates are
formed,[9]
[10]
[11]
[12] and when dihydropyridines are used, pyridinium salts form (Scheme [1a]).[13]
[14] The most explored reactions of this type are those that involve organoborane-mediated
hydride abstraction from α-amino C–H bonds, during which iminium borohydride salts
4 are generated (Scheme [1b]).
Scheme 1 Borane-mediated hydride abstraction forms Wheland intermediates, pyridinium borohydrides,
or iminium borohydrides
Organoborane-mediated hydride abstraction has been exploited in a variety of reactions
that generate iminium salts in situ directly from the corresponding alkyl amines and
include organoborane-catalyzed amine-based transfer hydrogenation and dehydrogenation,
racemization and isomerization, α-functionalization, β-functionalization, dual α,β-functionalization,
and C–N bond cleavage. In this review, we include new developments in organoborane-catalyzed
processes involving organoborane-mediated hydride abstraction in amines that have
been disclosed since our previous review.[6]
,
[15]
[16]
[17] New reactions herein include examples that generate complex amine products via cooperative
organoborane-metal catalysis, incorporate hydride shuttles, lead to multifunctionalizations,
and allow dehydrogenation of liquid organic hydrogen carriers. We will highlight key
features of the reactions and discuss the mechanisms in the context of the fate of
the iminium ion and how the borohydride reacts to allow catalyst turnover.
α-Functionalization of Amines
2
α-Functionalization of Amines
In our previous review[6] we reported studies whereby organoboranes catalyze the α-functionalization of amines.
B(C6F5)3-mediated α-amino C(sp3)–hydride abstraction was shown to result in the formation of hydridoborate and iminium
ions, which can be intercepted by various nucleophiles to result in formal α-N C–H functionalization processes with amines. In this review, we cover the reports
since our prior review, which include α-alkynylation, α-furylation, and cyclization
reactions.
Scheme 2 Borane-mediated hydride abstraction for the direct conversion of N-alkylamines into N-propargylamines; DCE = 1,2-dichloroethane
In 2020, Wasa and co-workers reported the conversion of N-alkylamines 5 and alkynyl trimethylsilanes 6 into propargyl amines 7 via dual Lewis acid/organocopper catalysis (Scheme [2]).[18] The catalyst system employed was composed of B(C6F5)3 and Cu(MeCN)4PF6 in combination with various ligands such as (S)-Ph-PyBOX (9a), (S)-(3,5-Me2-C6H3)-PyBOX (9b), or 1,2-bis(diphenylphosphino)ethane (9c). The proposed reaction mechanism is initiated by conversion of 10 into borate ion pair 11 in the presence of trityl alcohol or water. Ligand exchange in 11 with alkynyl silane 6 generates trimethylsilanol (12) and alkynyl borate 13. Subsequent transmetalation generates an alkynyl copper intermediate 16 in addition to B(C6F5)3, which abstracts a hydride from the α-N position within amine 5 to generate the iminium hydridoborate ion pair 17. Addition of the alkynyl copper intermediate 16 to the iminium ion produces N-propargylamine 7, while the hydridoborate ion reacts with trityl alcohol 19 to regenerate 11 and complete the catalytic cycle. Impressively, this approach enabled the derivatization
of a wide range of N-protected bioactive molecules, such as the antidepressants fluoxetine (cf. 7a) and duloxetine (cf. 7c). The protocol tolerated a range of functional groups, such as protected alcohols,
amides, esters, and halogens. For amine substrates with multiple sites of potential
hydride abstraction, the regioselectivity of propargylation was attributed to the
rapid consumption of short-lived CH2 iminium ions (derived from B(C6F5)3-mediated hydride abstraction at N-Me sites) before isomerization to lower energy iminium ions can occur. Furthermore,
through employing chiral PyBOX ligand 9b, a variety of N-propargylamines (e.g., 7b) could be accessed with high levels of enantiocontrol (up to 94% ee).
Scheme 3 Borane-mediated hydride abstraction utilized in the α-furanylation of amines
In 2022, Wang and co-workers reported the α-furylation of N-methyl-substituted tertiary amines using a borane/gold(I) co-catalytic system (Scheme
[3]).[19] It was found that a range of tertiary N-methylamines 20 and α-alkynylenones 21 could be converted into substituted furans 22 in the presence of B(C6F5)3 and AuCl(PPh3) catalysts. α-Furylation occurred regioselectively at N-methyl groups in the presence of N-benzyl groups. The mechanism was proposed to proceed via B(C6F5)3-mediated α-amino hydride abstraction to form an iminium hydridoborate ion 23 with concurrent gold-promoted cycloisomerization of α-alkynylenone 21 to produce an [Au]-associated furyl 1,3-dipole 24. Borohydride reduction of the furyl cation forms furyl species 25, which then adds to the iminium ion 26 to produce the observed α-amino furylation product 22, whilst regenerating the borane and gold catalysts. The procedure could be applied
to a range of compounds, including bioactive compounds such as butenafine to yield
derivative 22a. The reaction showed good functional group tolerance, including protected alcohols
22b, ethers 22c, trifluoromethyl groups, and halogens. When the iminium ions contained β-protons,
enamine intermediates were formed and engaged the aurated furans in [3+2] cycloadditions
resulting in α- and β-functionalization (see Section 4).
In 2021, Wang and co-workers reported the synthesis of N-heterocycles 28 and 29 via the B(C6F5)3-catalyzed dehydrogenative cyclization of 2-cyclopropyl-N,N-dimethylanilines 27 (Scheme [4]).[20]
Scheme 4 Borane-mediated hydride abstraction utilized in the cyclization of cyclopropyl anilines
Their protocol combined B(C6F5)3-mediated hydride abstraction with the B(C6F5)3-catalyzed cyclopropane-ring opening previously reported by Wang’s group in 2017.[21] Initially, B(C6F5)3 opens the cyclopropane ring to form zwitterion 30, before deprotonation by Barton’s base (2-tert-butyl-1,1,3,3-tetramethylguanidine) (BTMG) yields alkene 31. B(C6F5)3-mediated abstraction of the α-N C(sp3)–H hydride of the aniline then yields zwitterionic intermediate 33. Finally, intramolecular attack of the alkene moiety on the iminium yields the cyclization
products 28 or 29. Electron-donating groups on the non-aniline aryl group promoted attack through the
terminal alkenyl carbon (C2 of 33) to yield 1,2,3,4-tetrahydroquinolines 28. B(C6F5)3 is regenerated via an acid–base reaction within guanidinium borohydride salt 32, generating H2. Electron-withdrawing groups gave mixtures of 1,2,3,4-tetrahydroquinolines 28 and indolines 29 (often the major product), formed by attack of the alkene through the benzylic carbon
(C1) of the allylic borate. Functional group compatibility was demonstrated with,
for example, protected phenol (28a), halide (28b), and trifluoromethyl ether (29a) substituents.
In 2022, Maulide and co-workers reported the stereoselective synthesis of a variety
of azabicyclic structures 36 from enamines 34 (derived from N-heterocycles) and Michael acceptors 35 (Scheme [5]).[22] Initially, the two substrates, enamine 34 and Michael acceptor 35, react to form iminium 37. A mixture of B(2,6-F2C6H3)3 and the corresponding tetrabutylammonium borohydride salt effectively isomerizes
iminium ion 38 to form iminium 41 via a sequence of hydride donation to form 39 followed by hydride abstraction. A similar isomerization was also proposed by Oestreich
in the β,β′-H silylation of tertiary amines described below (see Scheme [9]). Interestingly, the Lewis acid B(2,6-F2C6H3)3 is significantly less electron-deficient than B(C6F5)3, which is almost exclusively used in organoborane-mediated hydride abstraction with
amines. Other organoboranes, including B(C6F5)3, BMes(2,6-F2C6H3)2 and BPh3, failed to yield the desired products, whilst B(2,4,6-F3C6H2)3 gave yields of <10%. With the iminium in the correct position, cyclization occurs
to give the desired aza-bicycles 36 as single diastereomers in most cases. The reaction tolerated a range of substituents
on the Michael acceptor 35 and enamine 34, including different heterocycles (e.g., 36a), ethers, halides and protected alcohols. Nitro or trifluoromethyl ketones could
also act as the electron-withdrawing group in 35. Acyclic enamines were amenable to the method, forming highly substituted monocyclic
piperidines. Additionally, it was shown that the process could be telescoped from
the aldehyde and amine corresponding to the enamine. Impressively, an enantioselective
variant was also reported, whereby an enantioselective organocatalyzed Michael addition
yielded enantioenriched aldehyde 44 prior to formation of iminium 45. Lewis acid/borohydride catalysis enabled the formation of azabicyclic products (e.g.,
36c) with very high enantioselectivity.
Scheme 5 Borane-mediated hydride abstraction utilized in the diastereoselective construction
of azabicycles from enamines and Michael acceptors. Asymmetric Michael addition conditions:
(i) l-phenylalanine lithium salt (10 mol%), CH2Cl2, 48 h; or (ii) O-(tert-butyl)-l-threonine (5 mol%), 4-dimethylaminopyridine (5 mol%), sulfamide (5 mol%), toluene,
6–36 h.
β-Functionalization of Amines
3
β-Functionalization of Amines
Our previous review covered organoborane-catalyzed β-functionalization of amines,
describing reactions such as β-silylation, β-alkylation, and β-deuteration.[6] These reactions occur when the iminium species formed upon hydride abstraction undergoes
deprotonation at the β-position, yielding reactive enamines. These enamines are capable
of acting as nucleophiles, which, if an appropriate electrophile is available, can
lead to β-functionalization. In this review, we cover new β-functionalizations with
isatins and Michael acceptors, as well as β-silylation.
Yang, Ma and co-workers reported the β-functionalization of pyrrolidines 46 with isatins 47 to give substituted pyrrolidines 48 (Scheme [6]).[23] The catalytic cycle proceeds via B(C6F5)3-mediated abstraction of the α-N C(sp3)–H hydride on pyrrolidine 46. The β-proton of the resultant iminium 49 is then removed to form enamine 50 and ammonium borohydride salt 51. Enamine 50 attacks the isatin 47 to form a new C–C bond in 52. Elimination of water then forms unsaturated species 53. Reduction of the iminium moiety in 53 with the hydride from the borohydride counterion forms β-functionalized product 48 and regenerates the B(C6F5)3 catalyst. The reaction demonstrated good stereoselectivity and tolerated various
functional groups such as halides, nitro groups (e.g., 48a), N-branched alkenes and alkynes (e.g., 48b). The use of diethyl ketomalonate rather than isatin 47 furnished product 48c, where water was not eliminated. It was also possible to dehydrogenate the pyrrolidine
products 48 to form pyrroles in situ (see Section 5).
Scheme 6 Borane-mediated hydride abstraction for consecutive β-functionalization and acceptorless
dehydrogenation
Scheme 7 Borane-mediated hydride abstraction for β-functionalization via a Michael-type reaction
In 2021, Wasa and co-workers studied the application of B(C6F5)3 in the β-amino C–H functionalization of amines 54 with Michael acceptors 55 to synthesize N-alkylamines 56 or 57 (Scheme [7]).[24] The reaction proceeds via B(C6F5)3-mediated abstraction of the α-N C(sp3)–H hydride yielding iminium borohydride 59, before deprotonation by a base (e.g., 54 or 56) to give enamine 61. This then undergoes nucleophilic attack on the B(C6F5)3-activated Michael acceptor 62 forming enolate 63, before reduction by the protonated base and hydridoborate yields the product 56 (path i). Alternatively, enolate 63 can tautomerize to form alternative product 57, with the protonated base/hydridoborate instead reducing the Michael acceptor 55 to yield alkane 58 (path ii). The method showed exceptional functional group tolerance, with examples
including ethers, secondary amines, and protected alcohols. Excitingly, the method
could also be used to derivatize bioactive compounds, including silyl-protected raloxifene
and risperidone to give products 56a and 57a, respectively.
In the same paper,[24] the Wasa group also reported an enantioselective variation of the reaction, using
a B(C6F5)3/Sc(OTf)3/PyBOX catalytic system to enable enantioselective C–C bond formation between N-alkylamines and Michael acceptors (Scheme [8]). As with the racemic version, the reaction proceeds through B(C6F5)3-mediated abstraction of the α-N C(sp3)–H hydride to give iminium borohydride 59. Mechanistic studies suggest that in the next step the borohydride reduces one equivalent
of the Michael acceptor, yielding boron enolate 68. Interestingly, kinetic and NMR spectroscopic studies suggest that the rate-limiting
step is the proton transfer from the β-position to the N-position of the enamine, yielding intermediate 69. This intermediate then protonates the boron enolate, giving 67 as a by-product, and freeing up the enamine to undergo nucleophilic attack on the
Sc-bound Michael acceptor 70, forming enolate 71. Due to the chiral scandium complex, attack selectively occurs on the Michael acceptor.
Product 66 can then form by intramolecular proton transfer, whilst product 65 forms upon reduction by a protonated base and the borohydride. As with the racemic
version, the reaction showed exceptional functional group tolerance, with examples
including trifluoromethyl groups (e.g., 65a), ketones, and protected alcohols. Additionally, bioactive molecules were also derivatized
(cf. 66a and 66b).
Scheme 8 Borane-mediated hydride abstraction for the enantioselective β-functionalization
of amines through a Michael-type addition
In 2021, Oestreich and co-workers reported a B(C6F5)3-catalyzed β,β′-H silylation of tertiary amines 72, yielding sila analogues of piperidines 74 (Scheme [9]).[25]
Scheme 9 Borane-mediated hydride abstraction leads to the β,β′-H silylation of tertiary amines
for the synthesis of sila-piperidines
The mechanism proceeds through B(C6F5)3-mediated abstraction of the α-N C(sp3)–H hydride in 72, to give iminium borohydride 75, before deprotonation by another equivalent of the amine 72 yields enamine 76 and ammonium borohydride 77. The ammonium borohydride then eliminates H2 to reform the active B(C6F5)3 catalyst and amine 72. The B(C6F5)3 catalysis can also activate the Si–H bond (cf. 78), creating an Si electrophile that can be attacked by enamine 76 to form a C–Si bond. The resulting iminium 79 can then undergo borohydride-induced tautomerization to give iminium 80, which can be deprotonated by another equivalent of 72 to yield enamine 81 and ammonium borohydride 77. The enamine 81 then proceeds through further B(C6F5)3-mediated C–Si bond formation, as before, to yield the desired product 74, with the ammonium borohydride 77 evolving H2 to reform the active catalyst B(C6F5)3. The reaction tolerated functional groups on the amine starting material such as
unprotected phenols (e.g., 74a), halogens, and trifluoromethyl groups, and the silane could also be varied to give
unsymmetric silanes (e.g., 74b) and substituted diarylsilanes (e.g., 74c).
In 2023, He, Zhao and co-workers reported the B(C6F5)3-catalyzed β-alkylation of tertiary amines 82 with 3H-indol-3-ones 83 to yield 2-alkylindolin-3-ones 84 (Scheme [10]).[26]
Scheme 10 Borane-mediated hydride abstraction facilitates the β-functionalization of amines
with 3H-indol-3-ones
The reaction is proposed to proceed through B(C6F5)3-mediated abstraction of the α-N C(sp3)–H hydride to yield iminium borohydride 85. This can then be deprotonated by a base (e.g., amines 82 or 88) to yield enamine 87, which undergoes nucleophilic addition to the 3H-indol-3-one 83 to give zwitterionic intermediate 88. This can then accept a proton from 86, before borohydride reduction to yield the desired product 84, as well as reforming B(C6F5)3. Functional group tolerance was demonstrated with ethers (e.g., 84a) and halogens (e.g., 84b), as was various substitution patterns around the aromatic rings. Additionally, the
reaction was demonstrated to work with N-butyl-N,N-diethylamine to give amine 84c.
α,β-Difunctionalization of Amines
4
α,β-Difunctionalization of Amines
α,β-Difunctionalization of amines facilitated by organoborane-mediated hydride abstraction
had not been reported at the time of our previous review,[6] and represents a new reaction class. Here the enamine can participate in cycloaddition
reactions resulting in α,β-difunctionalization. In this section we will look at how
this is leveraged to form cyclobutenes, furan-fused cyclopentenes, and alkyl-amino-functionalized
quinolines.
In 2021, Wang and Zhang reported the enantioselective organoborane-catalyzed coupling
of 1,2-dihydroquinolines 89 with alkynes 90 to deliver cyclobutene-fused 1,2,3,4-tetrahydroquinolines 92 (Scheme [11]).[27] The catalytic cycle is proposed to occur via hydride abstraction mediated by organoborane
91 that converts 1,2-dihydroquinoline 89 into quinolinium 93. Transfer of the hydride in 93 to the quinolinium fragment forms 1,4-dihydroquinoline 94. Effectively, organoborane 91 mediates isomerization of the dihydroquinoline via hydride abstraction. Organoborane
91 then plays the role of a conventional Lewis acid, activating alkyne 90 to allow the [2+2] cycloaddition with 94 to occur.
Scheme 11 Borane-mediated hydride abstraction leads to a [2+2] cycloaddition reaction between
the α- and β-positions of amines and alkynes
Scheme 12 Borane-mediated hydride abstraction in conjunction with gold(I)-catalysis leads to
the formal [3+2] cycloaddition of amines and α-alkynylenones
As part of their study into the borane/gold(I)-co-catalyzed α-furylation of tertiary
N-methylamines 20 (c.f. Scheme [3]), Wang and co-workers discovered that formal [3+2] cycloaddition products were observed
when utilizing N-alkyl-substituted tertiary amines 96 containing β-hydrogens (Scheme [12]).[19] It was found that a broad range of cycloadducts 97 could be accessed from tertiary N-alkylamines 96 and α-alkynylenones 21. In this case, B(C6F5)3-mediated hydride abstraction generates an iminium borohydride 99, which is deprotonated by a base (e.g., amines 96 or 97) to generate enamine intermediate 100. A subsequent [3+2] cycloaddition involving the enamine 100 and the aurated furan 1,3-dipole 24 gives the cycloaddition adduct 97 and regenerates the gold catalyst, whilst B(C6F5)3 can be reformed by transfer hydrogenation of another molecule of 24. The reaction was shown to tolerate substituents at the β-position of the amine (e.g.,
97b), as well as ethers (e.g., 97a), halogens, and protected phenols. The reaction conditions could also be applied
to the derivatization of bioactive compounds, such as in the formation of paroxetine
derivative 97d.
In 2022, He, Fan and co-workers reported an α,β-functionalization strategy involving
anilines 102 and benzo[c]isoxazoles 103 followed by a C–N bond cleavage to furnish functionalized quinoline derivatives 104 (Scheme [13]).[28] The catalytic cycle proceeds via B(C6F5)3-mediated abstraction of the α-N C(sp3)–H on N-aryl N,N-dialkyl amine 102. Deprotonation of the resultant iminium 105 (e.g., with 102 or 104) forms enamine 106 and ammonium borohydride salt 108. A [4+2] cycloaddition of enamine 106 with isoxazole 103 forms α,β-functionalized piperidine 107, which is then protonated by the ammonium salt 108 to form intermediate borohydride salt 109. Hydride from the borohydride counterion cleaves the N–O bond in 109 to form alcohol 110 and regenerate the catalyst. Elimination of water gives 111 before a tautomerization and subsequent C–N bond cleavage furnishes functionalized
quinoline 104. The reaction tolerated a broad range of functional groups on the aniline 102 ring including cyano (e.g., 104a), trifluoromethyl, nitro, ether and thioether groups. The saturated heterocycle in
102 was varied to allow for pyrrolidines, piperidines, azepanes (e.g., 104b), and even azocanes and azonanes to all be used in the protocol. Acyclic examples
such as diethylaniline and dipropylaniline were used to furnish quinoline 112 and 3-methylquinoline respectively. When ethyl 1-phenylpiperidine-4-carboxylate was
used, a further intermolecular condensation of the secondary amine and ester group
delivered product 113 with a lactam moiety.
Scheme 13 Borane-mediated hydride abstraction for the conversion of benzo[c]isoxazoles into functionalized quinolines
Dehydrogenation of Amines
5
Dehydrogenation of Amines
In our previous review,[6] we observed how hydride abstraction had been utilized in the dehydrogenation of
a variety of benzofused N-heterocycles,[29] as well as the dehydrogenative coupling of indoles with silanes and boranes. These
reactions are believed to proceed via an acceptorless dehydrogenation pathway, where
an ammonium borohydride intermediate (generated after hydride abstraction and iminium
tautomerization) undergoes an acid–base reaction to evolve H2. We have also seen a few examples of H2 evolution in several of the examples described above. Here, we look at the dehydrogenation
of β-functionalized pyrrolidines, and how the dehydrogenation of tetrahydroquinolines
has been utilized for hydrogen storage and purification.
Scheme 14 Borane-mediated hydride abstraction for the acceptorless dehydrogenation of isatin-functionalized
pyrrolidines
In the report from Yang, Ma and co-workers described in Section 3 on the β-functionalization
of pyrrolidines 46 with isatins 47, a pyrrolidine acceptorless dehydrogenation process was also reported.[23] The products of the aforementioned β-functionalization of pyrrolidines 48 were converted into pyrroles 114 (Scheme [14]). Simply increasing the temperature of the standard β-functionalization conditions
led to the formation of pyrroles. The authors proposed that the mechanism proceeds
through B(C6F5)3-mediated hydride abstraction on product 48 (as formed above in Scheme [6]) to form iminium species 115. Isomerization of 115 into 117 (or 116) creates an acidic proton that reacts with the borohydride counterion, causing aromatization,
loss of H2 and reformation of B(C6F5)3. Functional group tolerance was demonstrated for the two-step procedure with nitro
groups (e.g., 114a), halogens, alkenes (e.g., 114b), and ethers (e.g., 114c).
Ogoshi, Hoshimoto and co-workers have reported an organoborane-catalyzed dehydrogenation
applied to the purification of molecular hydrogen (Scheme [15]).[30]
Scheme 15 Borane-mediated hydride abstraction for the interconversion of liquid organic hydrogen
carriers.
A selection of organoboranes was shown to mediate the dehydrogenation of tetrahydroquinoline
118 to form quinoline 119 in high yield. Organoborane derivatives based on (2,6-dichlorophenyl)bis(2,6-difluorophenyl)borane
(e.g., 120–122), were shown to be optimal for the dehydrogenation of 118, with the brominated derivative 120 performing across both dehydrogenation and hydrogenation steps (see below). Whilst
no mechanism for the dehydrogenation was proposed, it is likely that the reaction
proceeds in a manner analogous to the acceptorless dehydrogenations encountered above
(e.g., Scheme [13], conversion of 102 into 106) and in our previous review.[6] The ability of organoboranes to mediate dehydrogenation via hydride abstraction
was applied to the purification of hydrogen from gaseous mixtures via a hydrogenation–dehydrogenation
sequence. Hydrogen was removed from a mixture of H2, CO and CO2 and incorporated into tetrahydroquinoline 118 via frustrated Lewis pair hydrogenation of quinoline 119.[31] Tetrahydroquinoline 118 was easily removed from the gas mixture, and separately dehydrogenated with borane
120, concurrently forming high purity H2 gas. Interestingly, the ubiquitous B(C6F5)3 borane performed significantly worse in the initial hydrogenation step due to competing
reactions with the H2/CO/CO2 mixture, as well as in the dehydrogenation step (88% vs 18% of 119).
Summary and Future Prospects
6
Summary and Future Prospects
In this review update, we have covered the recent advances made in organoborane-mediated
hydride abstraction. We have shown that various Lewis acidic borane catalysts are
able to mediate hydride abstraction from α-amino C–H bonds to yield a reactive iminium
cation and a hydridoborate anion. These have been demonstrated to participate in a
range of synthetically useful transformations, including α- or β-functionalization,
α,β-difunctionalization, and the dehydrogenation of amines. It has become clear that
further investigations are needed around the structure and electronic properties of
the organoborane catalyst, as subtle changes play an important role in catalyst performance,
as underscored by the work of Maulide,[22] Wang,[27] and Ogoshi and Hoshimoto[30] described above. The repurposing of common amine starting materials for novel transformations
is an important area in synthetic chemistry and we envision that further development
in the area of organoborane-mediated hydride abstraction will advance synthetic methodology,
and lead to more time- and atom-efficient syntheses in the future.
