Download PDF
Am J Perinatol 2024; 41(S 01): e1156-e1162
DOI: 10.1055/a-2000-6232
Original Article

Diagnostic Utility of Spinal Ultrasounds in Neonates

Saivaroon Gajagowni 
1   University of Missouri School of Medicine, Columbia, Missouri
,
Talissa Altes
2   Department of Radiology, University of Missouri Hospital, Columbia, Missouri
,
Akshaya J. Vachharajani 
3   Division of Neonatology, Department of Child Health, University of Missouri School of Medicine, Columbia, Missouri
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective Ultrasound (US) is a common imaging modality used to evaluate spinal anomalies in newborns. However, many indications for the use of spinal US are associated with low diagnostic yield. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the indications and the diagnostic utility of spinal USs performed in newborns at our institution. We also review patient presentations for caudal regression syndrome (CRS) that was identified from the USs performed.

Study Design This study is a retrospective review of spinal USs performed between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2021, in newborns at a single institution. Indications for each US and any associated abnormalities were noted. Infants with abnormal USs showing CRS are described with their long-term medical outcomes.

Results A total of 592 USs were performed during the specified time period of which 72 (12%) were abnormal. The presence of a sacral dimple was the most common indication for performing a spinal US, although only 14 (4%) were identified as abnormal. Of these 14, 6 (43%) were further evaluated by spinal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at the recommendations of a pediatric radiologist and of these, only 2 (14%) had abnormal MRI findings. The two newborns with abnormal MRI findings had mothers with diabetes mellitus in their pregnancies. Of note, one additional newborn had abnormalities on spinal US that was never confirmed on MRI due to being lost to follow-up. Among the other indications, anorectal anomalies (odds ratio [OR], 7.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.01–18.91), spinal mass (OR, 17.99; 95% CI, 7.86–41.2), and meningocele were most associated with abnormal findings.

Conclusion Overall, spinal US has a low diagnostic yield. Sacral dimple was the most common indication for performing a spinal US but had a low yield with few long-term sequelae. Anorectal anomalies had a strong association with abnormal US findings.

Key Points

  • Sacral dimple is a common indication for spinal ultrasound.

  • Spinal ultrasound has low diagnostic yield when performed for sacral dimple.

  • Caudal regression syndrome is associated with maternal diabetes and numerous long-term comorbidities.

Keywords

sacral dimple - spinal ultrasound - caudal regression syndrome - maternal diabetes


Publication History

Received: 25 July 2022

Accepted: 08 December 2022

Accepted Manuscript online:
17 December 2022

Article published online:
16 January 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Forci K, Bouaiti EA, Alami MH, Mdaghri Alaoui A, Thimou Izgua A. Incidence of neural tube defects and their risk factors within a cohort of Moroccan newborn infants. BMC Pediatr 2021; 21 (01) 124
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Facts about neural tube defects. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Published October 23, 2020. Accessed May 22, 2022 at: https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/birthdefects/facts-about-neural-tube-defects.html
    PubMed
  • 3 Zywicke HA, Rozzelle CJ. Sacral dimples. [published correction appears in Pediatr Rev. 2011 Apr;32(4):151] [published correction appears in Pediatr Rev. 2011 May;32(5):207] Pediatr Rev 2011;32(03):109–113, quiz 114, 151
    PubMed
  • 4 Fitzgerald K. Ultrasound examination of the neonatal spine. Australas J Ultrasound Med 2011; 14 (01) 39-41
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Albert GW. Spine ultrasounds should not be routinely performed for patients with simple sacral dimples. Acta Paediatr 2016; 105 (08) 890-894
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Wilson P, Hayes E, Barber A, Lohr J. Screening for spinal dysraphisms in newborns with sacral dimples. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 2016; 55 (11) 1064-1070
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 McGovern M, Mulligan S, Carney O, Wall D, Moylett E. Ultrasound investigation of sacral dimples and other stigmata of spinal dysraphism. Arch Dis Child 2013; 98 (10) 784-786
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Kucera JN, Coley I, O'Hara S, Kosnik EJ, Coley BD. The simple sacral dimple: diagnostic yield of ultrasound in neonates. Pediatr Radiol 2015; 45 (02) 211-216
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Diel J, Ortiz O, Losada RA, Price DB, Hayt MW, Katz DS. The sacrum: pathologic spectrum, multimodality imaging, and subspecialty approach. Radiographics 2001; 21 (01) 83-104
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Boulas MM. Recognition of caudal regression syndrome. Adv Neonatal Care 2009; 9 (02) 61-69 , quiz 70–71
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Wilmshurst JM, Kelly R, Borzyskowski M. Presentation and outcome of sacral agenesis: 20 years' experience. Dev Med Child Neurol 1999; 41 (12) 806-812
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar