physioscience 2023; 19(01): 33-41
DOI: 10.1055/a-1771-4789
Original Paper

Experiences of people living with long-term neurological conditions and using telerehabilitation during the COVID-19 lockdown in Switzerland: explorative interviews

Erfahrungen von Menschen mit neurologischer Langzeiterkrankung mit Telerehabilitation während des COVID-19-Lockdowns in der Schweiz: explorative Interviews
Monique Dummermuth
1   University of the West of England, Bristol, United Kingdom
2   Bürgerspital Solothurn, Solothurn, Switzerland
,
Fabienne Keller
3   Haute École De Santé Vaud, Lausanne, Switzerland
,
Lindsay Smith
1   University of the West of England, Bristol, United Kingdom
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Background Therapy interventions were disrupted by the first lockdown during the COVID-19 pandemic in Switzerland. An instant change to telerehabilitation had to be implemented by physiotherapists.

Aim Exploration of experiences of individuals living with a long-term neurological condition receiving telerehabilitation physiotherapy interventions during the first lockdown.

Method Persons with a long-term neurological condition were recruited from the outpatient clinic of a local hospital in the German-speaking part of Switzerland during February and March 2021. Semi-structured individual interviews with a phenomenological perspective were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis.

Results 4 persons, 2 with multiple sclerosis and 2 with stroke (aged 44–75), were interviewed. There were 3 main themes, of which 2 had 3 subthemes: 1) Living with a neurological condition during a pandemic (daily life without and within a pandemic, symptoms, feelings and attitudes influenced by the pandemic); 2) Therapy experiences (therapeutic relationship, remote therapy, therapy experiences after the first lockdown); and 3) Family and social environment. Synchronous interventions such as live video sessions or live online groups were favored when compared to telephone calls or asynchronous digital interventions. However, for participants, it was equally important to explain how the pandemic influenced them in general.

Conclusion Individuals interviewed appreciated having received therapy during the lockdown, favoring synchronous interventions. However, there are still many unanswered questions about how best to support these populations, and evidence-based recommendations are needed.

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund Der durch die COVID-19-Pandemie verursachte erste Lockdown führte zur Unterbrechung nicht dringend notwendiger Physiotherapiebehandlungen in der Schweiz. Ein unmittelbarer Wechsel zu Telerehabilitationsinterventionen durch Physiotherapeut*innen war notwendig.

Ziel Eine explorative Untersuchung von Therapie- und Lebenserfahrungen während des ersten Lockdowns bei Personen, die mit einer neurologischen Erkrankung leben.

Methode Menschen mit einer neurologischen Grunderkrankung wurden im Ambulatorium eines Regionalspitales in der deutschsprachigen Schweiz zwischen Februar und März 2021 rekrutiert. Es wurden semistrukturierte Interviews unter phänomenologischer Perspektive aufgezeichnet, transkribiert und mithilfe einer reflexiven thematischen Analyse ausgewertet.

Ergebnisse Es wurden 4 Personen, 2 mit Diagnose Multiple Sklerose und 2 mit Status nach Schlaganfall (Alter 44–75 Jahre), befragt. Bei der Datenanalyse wurden 3 Hauptthemen herausgearbeitet, davon 2 mit jeweils 3 Unterthemen: 1) Leben mit einer neurologischen Erkrankung während einer Pandemie (Alltag ohne und während der Pandemie, Symptome, Gefühle und Einstellungen, die durch die Pandemie beeinflusst wurden); 2) Therapieerfahrungen (therapeutische Beziehung, Teletherapie, Therapieerfahrungen nach erstem Lockdown) und 3) Familie und soziales Umfeld. Dabei wurden synchrone Interventionen wie Live-Videositzungen oder Live-Online-Gruppen im Vergleich zu Telefonanrufen oder aufgezeichneten digitalen Interventionen bevorzugt. Alle Teilnehmenden erlebten negative Folgen in Bezug auf Symptome und soziales Leben und erklärten, wie die Pandemie sie allgemein beeinflusste.

Schlussfolgerung Die Teilnehmenden schätzten es, während des Lockdowns eine Form von Therapie erhalten zu haben und bevorzugten dabei synchrone Interventionen. Es gibt noch viele unbeantwortete Fragen darüber, wie diese Bevölkerungsgruppe in solchen Situationen am besten unterstützt werden kann, dafür werden evidenzbasierte Empfehlungen benötigt.



Publication History

Received: 08 February 2022

Accepted: 06 July 2022

Article published online:
16 November 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 Smith EE, Mountain A, Hill MD. et al. Canadian Stroke Best Practice Guidance During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Can J Neurol Sci 2020; 47: 474-478 DOI: 10.1017/cjn.2020.74.
  • 2 Federal Council, (Ed.). Verordnung 2 über Massnahmen zur Bekämpfung des Coronavirus. Bern:. 2020: 783-788 . Im Internet (Stand 27.10.2022): www.newsd.admin.ch/newsd/message/attachments/60681.pdf
  • 3 World Physiotherapy (Ed.). World Physiotherapy response to Covid-19; Physiotherapy digital practice experiences and insights during Covid-19. Briefing Paper. World Physiotherapy. 2021: 1-17
  • 4 Hinman RS, Lawford BJ, Bennell KL. Harnessing technology to deliver care by physical therapists for people with persistent joint pain: Telephone and video‐conferencing service models. J Biobehav Res 2019; 24: n/a-n/a DOI: 10.1111/jabr.12150.
  • 5 Hinman RS, Nelligan RK, Bennell KL. et al. Sounds a Bit Crazy, But It Was Almost More Personal: A Qualitative Study of Patient and Clinician Experiences of Physical Therapist – Prescribed Exercise For Knee Osteoarthritis Via Skype. Arthr Care Res 2017; 69: 1834-1844 DOI: 10.1002/acr.23218.
  • 6 Lawford BJ, Delany C, Bennell KL. et al. “I was really sceptical. But it worked really well”: a qualitative study of patient perceptions of telephone-delivered exercise therapy by physiotherapists for people with knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarth Cartil 2018; 26: 741-750 DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2018.02.909.
  • 7 Shulver W, Killington M, Morris C. et al. “Well, if the kids can do it, I can do it”: older rehabilitation patientsʼ experiences of telerehabilitation. Health expectations: Int J Pub Partic Health Care and Health Policy 2017; 20: 120-129 DOI: 10.1111/hex.12443.
  • 8 Tenforde AS, Zafonte R, Hefner J. et al. Evidence-Based Physiatry: Efficacy of Home-Based Telerehabilitation Versus In-Clinic Therapy for Adults After Stroke. Am J Phys Med Rehab 2020; 99: 764-765 DOI: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001475.
  • 9 Norman CD. eHealth Literacy: Essential Skills for Consumer Health in a Networked World. J Med Inter Res 2006; 8: e9-e9 DOI: 10.2196/jmir.8.2.e9.
  • 10 Sørensen K. Health literacy and public health: A systematic review and integration of definitions and models. BMC Pub Health 2012; 12: 80-80 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-80.
  • 11 Meier C. Digitale Gesundheit: Schweiz hinkt im internationalen Vergleich hinterher. Winterthur: Medinside; ; published online 6. Dezember 2018. Im Internet (Stand 27.10.2022): www.medinside.ch/post/digitale-gesundheit-schweiz-hinkt-im-internationalen-vergleich-hinterher
  • 12 Zingg T, Sojerb R, Röthlisberger R. Digitalisierung in der ambulanten Gesundheitsversorgung. Schweizerische Ärztezeitung 2019; 100: 113-116 DOI: 10.4414/saez.2019.17521.
  • 13 Suter Fiechter A, Kilchhofer M, Winteler B. et al. Telemedizin in der Physiotherapie während der COVID-19 Pandemie. physiopraxis online 2020; 07: 1-8
  • 14 Beerli N. Teletherapie in der Akutgeriatrie während der Corona-Pandemie. physioactive 2020; 5: 31-33
  • 15 Negrini S, Donzelli S, Negrini A. et al. Feasibility and Acceptability of Telemedicine to Substitute Outpatient Rehabilitation Services in the COVID-19 Emergency in Italy: An Observational Everyday Clinical-Life Study. Archives Phy Med Rehab 2020; 101: 2027-2032 DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.08.001.
  • 16 Tenforde AS, Borgstrom H, Polich G. et al. Outpatient Physical, Occupational, and Speech Therapy Synchronous Telemedicine: A Survey Study of Patient Satisfaction with Virtual Visits During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Am J Phys Med Rehab 2020; 99: 977-981 DOI: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001571.
  • 17 McWilliam CL. Phenomenology. In: Bourgeault ID, De Vries R. , Hrsg. The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Methods and Health Research. London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2010: 229-248
  • 18 Blacquiere D, Lindsay MP, Foley N. et al. Canadian Stroke Best Practice Recommendations: Telestroke Best Practice Guidelines Update 2017. Inter J Stroke 2017; 12: 886-895 DOI: 10.1177/1747493017706239.
  • 19 Normann B, Sørgaard KW, Salvesen R. et al. Clinical Guidance of Community Physiotherapists Regarding People with MS: Professional Development and Continuity of Care: Clinical Guidance in MS: Professional Development and Continuity of Care. Physiother Res Int: J Res Clinic Phys Ther 2014; 19: 25-33 DOI: 10.1002/pri.1557.
  • 20 Tomlinson CL, Patel S, Meek C. et al. Physiotherapy intervention in Parkinson’s disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2012; 345: 1-14 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.e5004.
  • 21 Petty NJ, Thomson OP, Stew G. Ready for a paradigm shift? Part 2: Introducing qualitative research methodologies and methods. Man Ther 2012; 17: 378-384 DOI: 10.1016/j.math.2012.03.004.
  • 22 Giacomini M. Theory Matters in Qualitative Health Research. In: Bourgeault I, Dingwall R, De Vries R. Ed. The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Methods in Health Research. London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2010. DOI: 10.4135/9781446268247
  • 23 Bevan MT. A Method of Phenomenological Interviewing. Qual Health Res 2014; 24: 136-144 DOI: 10.1177/1049732313519710.
  • 24 Patton MQ. Qualitative research & evaluation methods: integrating theory and practice. 4th. Ed.. Los Angeles: SAGE; 2015
  • 25 Moerman M. The field of analyzing foreign language conversations. J Pragmatic 1996; 26: 147-158 DOI: 10.1016/0378-2166(96)00009-4.
  • 26 Temple B, Young A. Qualitative Research and Translation Dilemmas. Qual Res 2004; 4: 161-178 DOI: 10.1177/1468794104044430.
  • 27 Braun V, Clarke V. One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis?. Qual Res Psychol 2020; DOI: 10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238.
  • 28 Saldaña J. Coding and Analysis Strategies. In: Leavy P. Hrsg. The Oxford handbook of qualitative research. 2th Ed.. New York: Oxford University Press; 2014: 579-606
  • 29 Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 2006; 3: 77-101 DOI: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
  • 30 Braun V, Clarke V. Successful qualitative research: a practical guide for beginners. London: SAGE; 2013
  • 31 World Health Organisation, Ed. How to use the ICF: A practical manual for using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Exposure draft for comment. Geneva: WHO; 2013
  • 32 Federal Council, Ed. Verordnungüber Massnahmen in der besonderen Lage zur Bekämpfung der Covid-19-Epidemie, Covid-19-Verordnung besondere Lage, Massnahmenverschärfung Dezember. Bern: Eidgenössisches Departement des Innern; 2020: 1-6
  • 33 Stockwell S, Trott M, Tully M. et al. Changes in physical activity and sedentary behaviours from before to during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown: a systematic review. BMJ Open Sport & Exer Med 2021; 7 DOI: 10.1136/bmjsem-2020-000960.
  • 34 Dennett R, Coulter E, Paul L. et al. A qualitative exploration of the participantsʼ experience of a web-based physiotherapy program for people with multiple sclerosis: Does it impact on the ability to increase and sustain engagement in physical activity?. Disabil Rehab 2020; 42: 3007-3014 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1582717.
  • 35 Paul L, Renfrew L, Freeman J. et al. Web-based physiotherapy for people affected by multiple sclerosis: a single blind, randomized controlled feasibility study. Clinic Rehab 2019; 33: 473-484 DOI: 10.1177/0269215518817080.
  • 36 Haggerty JL, Reid RJ, Freeman GK. et al. Continuity of care: a multidisciplinary review. BMJ 2003; 327: 1219-1268 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.327.7425.1219.
  • 37 Pindus DM, Mullis R, Lim L. et al. Stroke survivorsʼ and informal caregiversʼ experiences of primary care and community healthcare services – A systematic review and meta-ethnography. PloS one 2018; 13: e0192533-e0192533 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192533.
  • 38 Allen C, Vassilev I, Kennedy A. et al. Long-Term Condition Self-Management Support in Online Communities: A Meta-Synthesis of Qualitative Papers. J Med Inter Res 2016; 18: e61-e61 DOI: 10.2196/jmir.5260.
  • 39 Banerjee D, Rai M. Social isolation in Covid-19: The impact of loneliness. Int J Social Psychi 2020; 66: 525-527 DOI: 10.1177/0020764020922269.
  • 40 Kendzerska T, Zhu DT, Gershon AS. et al. The Effects of the Health System Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic on Chronic Disease Management: A Narrative Review. Risk Man Healthcare Pol 2021; 14: 575-584 DOI: 10.2147/RMHP.S293471.
  • 41 Federal Office of Public Health, Ed. Schlussbericht Bevölkerungsbefragung „Erhebung Gesundheitskompetenz 2015“. Bern: FOPH; 2016: 1-160
  • 42 Werneke MW, Deutscher D, Grigsby D. et al. Telerehabilitation During the Covid-19 Pandemic in Outpatient Rehabilitation Settings: A Descriptive Study. Phys Ther 2021; 101: 1-11 DOI: 10.1093/ptj/pzab110.
  • 43 Gilbert AW, Booth G, Betts T. et al. A mixed-methods survey to explore issues with virtual consultations for musculoskeletal care during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Musculoskel Dis 2021; 22: 245-245 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-021-04113-y.
  • 44 Chartered Society of Physiotherapy, Ed. Remote Physiotherapy delivery options. London: CSP; 2020
  • 45 Edwards M, Wood F, Davies M. et al. “Distributed health literacy”: longitudinal qualitative analysis of the roles of health literacy mediators and social networks of people living with a long‐term health condition. Health expectations: Int J Pub Part Healthcare Health Pol 2015; 18: 1180-1193 DOI: 10.1111/hex.12093.
  • 46 Goitom M. Multilingual Research: Reflections on Translating Qualitative Data. Brit J Social Work 2019; 50: 548-564 DOI: 10.1093/bjsw/bcz162.