Endoscopy 2021; 53(11): 1150-1159
DOI: 10.1055/a-1332-6727
Original article

Factors associated with complete clip closure after endoscopic mucosal resection of large colorectal polyps

 1   Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
,
Douglas K. Rex
 2   Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
,
Ian S. Grimm
 3   Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
,
Matthew T. Moyer
 4   Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA
,
Muhammad K. Hasan
 5   Center for Interventional Endoscopy, AdventHealth, Orlando, Florida, USA
,
 6   Division of Gastroenterology Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
,
B. Joseph Elmunzer
 7   Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
,
Mouen A. Khashab
 8   Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
,
Omid Sanaei
 8   Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
,
Firas H. Al-Kawas
 9   Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins University, Sibley Memorial Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
,
Stuart R. Gordon
10   Dartmouth Geisel School of Medicine, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA
11   Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
,
Abraham Mathew
 4   Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA
,
John M. Levenick
 4   Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA
,
Harry R. Aslanian
12   Section of Digestive Diseases, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
,
13   Division of Gastroenterology, John D. Dingell Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA
,
14   Division of Gastroenterology, University of Montreal Medical Center (CHUM) and Research Center (CRCHUM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada
,
Seth D. Crockett
 3   Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
,
Amit Rastogi
15   Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Motility, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
,
Jeffrey A. Gill
16   Division of Gastroenterology, James A. Haley VA, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA
,
Ryan Law
17   Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
,
18   Department of Gastroenterology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
,
Pooja A. Elias
 7   Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
,
Todd A. MacKenzie
19   The Dartmouth Institute, Department for Biomedical Data Science, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
,
Heiko Pohl*
11   Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
20   Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, VA White River Junction, Vermont, USA
,
Maria Pellisé*
21   Department of Gastroenterology, Institut d’Investigacions Biomediques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
22   Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
› Author Affiliations
Preview

Abstract

Background and study aim Delayed bleeding is a common adverse event following endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of large colorectal polyps. Prophylactic clip closure of the mucosal defect after EMR of nonpedunculated polyps larger than 20 mm reduces the incidence of severe delayed bleeding, especially in proximal polyps. This study aimed to evaluate factors associated with complete prophylactic clip closure of the mucosal defect after EMR of large polyps.

Methods This is a post hoc analysis of the CLIP study (NCT01936948). All patients randomized to the clip group were included. Main outcome was complete clip closure of the mucosal resection defect. The defect was considered completely closed when no remaining mucosal defect was visible and clips were less than 1 cm apart. Factors associated with complete closure were evaluated in multivariable analysis.

Results In total, 458 patients (age 65, 58 % men) with 494 large polyps were included. Complete clip closure of the resection defect was achieved for 338 polyps (68.4 %); closure was not complete for 156 (31.6 %). Factors associated with complete closure in adjusted analysis were smaller polyp size (odds ratio 1.06 for every millimeter decrease [95 % confidence interval 1.02–1.08]), good access (OR 3.58 [1.94–9.59]), complete submucosal lifting (OR 2.28 [1.36–3.90]), en bloc resection (OR 5.75 [1.48–22.39]), and serrated histology (OR 2.74 [1.35–5.56]).

Conclusions Complete clip closure was not achieved for almost one in three resected large nonpedunculated polyps. While stable access and en bloc resection facilitate clip closure, most factors associated with clip closure are not modifiable. This highlights the need for alternative closure options and measures to prevent bleeding.

* These authors share last authorship.


Tables 1s, 2s



Publication History

Received: 10 July 2020

Accepted: 08 December 2020

Accepted Manuscript online:
08 December 2020

Article published online:
20 April 2021

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany