The role of endoscopic ultrasound guidance for biliary and pancreatic duct access and drainage to overcome the limitations of ERCP: a retrospective evaluation

Abstract

Background Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided ductal access and drainage (EUS-DAD) of biliary/pancreatic ducts after failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is less invasive than percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD). The actual need for EUS-DAD remains unknown. We aimed to determine how often EUS-DAD is needed to overcome ERCP failure.

Methods Consecutive duct access procedures (n = 2205; 95 % biliary) performed between June 2013 and November 2015 at a tertiary-care center were reviewed. ERCP was used first line, EUS-DAD as salvage after ERCP, and PTBD when both had failed. Procedures were defined as “index” in patients without prior endoscopic duct access and “combined” when EUS-DAD followed successful ERCP. The main outcomes were the EUS-DAD and PTBD rates.

Results EUS-DAD was performed in 7.7 % (170/2205) of overall procedures: 9.1 % (116/1274) index and 5.8 % (54/931) follow-up. Most index EUS-DADs were performed following (46 %) or anticipating (39 %) ERCP failure, whereas 15 % followed successful ERCP (combined procedures). Among index procedures, the EUS-DAD rate was higher in surgically altered anatomy (58.2 % [39 /67)] vs. 6.4 % [77/1207]); PTBD was required in 0.2 % (3/1274). Among follow-up procedures, ERCP represented 85.7 %, cholangiopancreatography through mature transmural fistulas 8.5 %, and EUS-DAD 5.8 %; no patient required PTBD. The secondary PTBD rate was 0.1 % (3/2205). Six primary PTBDs were performed (overall PTBD rate 0.4 % [9/2205]).

Conclusions EUS-DAD was required in 7.7 % of ERCPs for benign and malignant biliary/pancreatic duct indications. Salvage PTBD was required in 0.1 %. This high EUS-DAD rate reflects disease complexity, a wide definition of ERCP failure, and restrictive PTBD use, not poor ERCP skills. EUS-DAD effectively overcomes the limitations of ERCP eliminating the need for primary and salvage PTBD in most cases.

Publication History

Received: 28 October 2019

Accepted: 21 September 2020

Accepted Manuscript online:
21 September 2020

Article published online:
01 December 2020

• References

• 1 Baron TH, Kozarek R, Carr-Locke DL. ERCP, 3rd edition. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2018
• 2 Rees J, Mytton J, Evison F. et al. The outcomes of biliary drainage by percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography for the palliation of malignant biliary obstruction in England between 2001 and 2014: A retrospective cohort study. BMJ Open 2020; 10: e033576
• 3 Caillol F, Bories E, Zemmour C. et al. Palliative endoscopic drainage of malignant stenosis of biliary confluence: Efficiency of multiple drainage approach to drain a maximum of liver segments. United Eur Gastroenterol J 2019; 7: 52-59
• 4 Wiggers JK, Koerkamp BG, Coelen RJ. et al. Preoperative biliary drainage in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: Identifying patients who require percutaneous drainage after failed endoscopic drainage. Endoscopy 2015; 47: 1124-1131
• 5 Donatelli G, Vergeau BM, Derhy S. et al. Combined endoscopic and radiologic approach for complex bile duct injuries (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 79: 855-864
• 6 Schreuder AM, Booij KAC, De Reuver PR. et al. Percutaneous-endoscopic rendezvous procedure for the management of bile duct injuries after cholecystectomy: Short- and long-term outcomes. Endoscopy 2018; 50: 577-587
• 7 Irani S, Gluck M, Ross A. et al. Resolving external pancreatic fistulas in patients with disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome: Using rendezvous techniques to avoid surgery (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 76: 586-593
• 8 Perez-Miranda M, De la Serna C, Diez-Redondo P. et al. Endosonography-guided cholangiopancreatography as a salvage drainage procedure for obstructed biliary and pancreatic ducts. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 2: 212-222
• 9 Shah JN, Marson F, Weilert F. et al. Single-operator, single-session EUS-guided anterograde cholangiopancreatography in failed ERCP or inaccessible papilla. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: 56-64
• 10 Dhir V, Bhandari S, Bapat M. et al. Comparison of EUS-guided rendezvous and precut papillotomy techniques for biliary access (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: 354-359
• 11 Teoh AYB, Dhir V, Kida M. et al. Consensus guidelines on the optimal management in interventional EUS procedures: results from the Asian EUS group RAND/UCLA expert panel. Gut 2018; 67: 1209-1228
• 12 Sharaiha RZ, Khan MA, Kamal F. et al. Efficacy and safety of EUS-guided biliary drainage in comparison with percutaneous biliary drainage when ERCP fails: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2017; 85: 904-914
• 13 Bang JY, Navaneethan U, Hasan M. et al. Stent placement by EUS or ERCP for primary biliary decompression in pancreatic cancer: a randomized trial (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2018; 88: 9-17
• 14 Logiudice FP, Bernardo WM, Galetti F. et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided vs endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography biliary drainage for obstructed distal malignant biliary strictures: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 11: 281-291
• 15 Holt BA, Hawes R, Hasan M. et al. Biliary drainage: role of EUS guidance. Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 83: 160-165
• 16 Lee A, Aditi A, Bhat YM. et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary access versus precut papillotomy in patients with failed biliary cannulation: A retrospective study. Endoscopy 2017; 49: 146-153
• 17 Nakai Y, Isayama H, Yamamoto N. et al. Indications for endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)-guided biliary intervention: Does EUS always come after failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography?. Dig Endosc 2017; 29: 218-225
• 18 Maranki J, Hernandez AJ, Arslan B. et al. Interventional endoscopic ultrasound-guided cholangiography: Long-term experience of an emerging alternative to percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography. Endoscopy 2009; 41: 532-538
• 19 Poincloux L, Rouquette O, Buc E. et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage after failed ERCP: cumulative experience of 101 procedures at a single center. Endoscopy 2015; 47: 794-801
• 20 Tonozuka R, Itoi T, Tsuchiya T. et al. EUS-guided biliary drainage is infrequently used even in high-volume centers of interventional EUS. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2016; 84: 206-207
• 21 Park DH, Jeong SU, Lee BU. et al. Prospective evaluation of a treatment algorithm with enhanced guidewire manipulation protocol for EUS-guided biliary drainage after failed ERCP (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 78: 91-101
• 22 Imai H, Kitano M, Omoto S. et al. EUS-guided gallbladder drainage for rescue treatment of malignant distal biliary obstruction after unsuccessful ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 84: 147-151
• 23 Kunda R, Pérez-Miranda M, Will U. et al. EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy for malignant distal biliary obstruction using a lumen-apposing fully covered metal stent after failed ERCP. Surg Endosc 2016; 30: 5002-5008
• 24 James TW, Fan YC, Baron TH. EUS-guided hepaticoenterostomy as a portal to allow definitive antegrade treatment of benign biliary diseases in patients with surgically altered anatomy. Gastrointest Endosc 2018; 88: 547-554
• 25 Mukai S, Itoi T, Sofuni A. et al. EUS-guided antegrade intervention for benign biliary diseases in patients with surgically altered anatomy (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 89: 399-407
• 26 Khashab M, El Zein M, Sharzehi K. et al. EUS-guided biliary drainage or enteroscopy-assisted ERCP in patients with surgical anatomy and biliary obstruction: an international comparative study. Endosc Int Open 2016; 4: E1322-E1327
• 27 Perez-Miranda M, Sanchez-Ocaña R, De La Serna Higuera C. et al. Transenteric anastomosis with lumen-apposing metal stent as a conduit for iterative endotherapy of malignant biliary obstruction in altered anatomy. Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 80: 339
• 28 Park DH, Song TJ, Eum J. et al. EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy with a fully covered metal stent as the biliary diversion technique for an occluded biliary metal stent after a failed ERCP (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71: 413-419
• 29 Cotton PB, Eisen G, Romagnuolo J. et al. Grading the complexity of endoscopic procedures: results of an ASGE working party. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73: 868-874
• 30 Sanchez-Ocaña R, Peñas-Herrero I, De La Serna-Higuera C. et al. Peroral transhepatic cholangioscopy and antegrade sphincterotomy via EUS-guided anastomosis. Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 83: 466-467
• 31 Oh D, Park DH, Song TJ. et al. Optimal biliary access point and learning curve for endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy with transmural stenting. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2017; 10: 42-53
• 32 James T, Baron T. Practical applications and learning curve for EUS-guided hepaticoenterostomy: results of a large single-center US retrospective analysis. Endosc Int Open 2019; 7: E600-E607
• 33 Paik WH, Lee NK, Nakai Y. et al. Conversion of external percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage to endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy after failed standard internal stenting for malignant biliary obstruction. Endoscopy 2017; 49: 544-548
• 34 Kongkam P, Orprayoon T, Boonmee C. et al. Combination of ERCP and EUS-guided biliary drainage versus PTBD for malignant hilar biliary obstruction: a multicenter observational open-label study. Endoscopy 2020; DOI: 10.1055/a-1195-8197.
• 35 Nam K, Kim D, Lee T. et al. Patient perception and preference of EUS-guided drainage over percutaneous drainage when endoscopic transpapillary biliary drainage fails: An international multicenter survey. Endosc Ultrasound 2018; 7: 48-55