Endoscopy 2020; 52(10): 886-890
DOI: 10.1055/a-1176-0967
Innovations and brief communications

Effectiveness of combination endoscopic therapy for colonic anastomotic leaks

Nikhil R. Thiruvengadam
1   Division of Gastroenterology, UCSF Medical Center, San Francisco, California, United States
,
Christopher Hamerski
2   Interventional Endoscopy Services, California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, California, United States
,
Andrew Nett
2   Interventional Endoscopy Services, California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, California, United States
,
Yasser Bhat
3   Division of Gastroenterology, Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Palo Alto, California, United States
,
Janak Shah
4   Division of Gastroenterology, Ochsner Medical Center, Louisiana, United States.
,
Jona Bernabe
2   Interventional Endoscopy Services, California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, California, United States
,
Steven Kane
2   Interventional Endoscopy Services, California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, California, United States
,
Kenneth Binmoeller
2   Interventional Endoscopy Services, California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, California, United States
,
Rabindra R. Watson
2   Interventional Endoscopy Services, California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, California, United States
› Author Affiliations
Preview

Abstract

Background Colonic anastomotic leaks are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Whereas small case series suggest that fully covered self-expandable metal stents (FCSEMS) are effective, no larger studies have examined the impact of combination endoscopic therapy on colonic anastomotic leaks.

Methods Our retrospective cohort study reviewed 51 patients undergoing endoscopic therapy for colonic anastomotic leaks between 2011 and 2018. Patients receiving combination therapy involving FCSEMS plus local closure (n = 24) were compared with patients receiving FCSEMS alone (n = 18) or endoscopic suturing alone (n = 9). The primary outcomes were technical and clinical success (resolution of leak, removal of percutaneous drains, avoidance of surgical reoperation, and reversal of temporary diversion).

Results Clinical success was achieved in 55 % of patients. Clinical success was achieved in 18/24 patients (75 %) with combination therapy compared with 6/18 patients receiving FCSEMS alone (33 %, adjusted risk ratio [RR] 2.16, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.10 – 4.24; P = 0.02) and 4 /9 patients undergoing endoscopic suturing alone (44 %, RR 1.91, 95 %CI 0.84 – 4.31; P = 0.10). Stent migration occurred in 40 % of patients.

Conclusions This large series demonstrates that combination therapy was associated with a higher rate of clinical success, and future prospective studies are warranted.

Supplementary material



Publication History

Received: 05 November 2019

Accepted: 03 April 2020

Article published online:
10 June 2020

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany