Incidence of complications during the initial years of formation of a cleft lip and palate service

▪ ABSTRACT

Introduction:

Cleft lip and palate is the most common congenital craniofacial malformation. Difficulties in eating, speaking, and hearing are common in these patients, requiring multidisciplinary treatment, which makes it difficult to create and maintain specialized services. The diversity of classifications and the large number of surgical techniques used in primary surgeries (cheiloplasty and palatoplasty) make it difficult to compare epidemiological data and complications between services, and there is a lack of studies evaluating newly created specialized centers for cleft lip and palate.

Method:

A prospective cohort study was carried out with patients diagnosed with cleft lip and palate who underwent primary surgical procedures at the Hospital de Clínicas of the Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, between July 2017 and February 2023. Patients under 18 years of age with follow-up were included. post-operative period of at least 3 months.

Results:

79 patients participated in the study, who underwent 115 primary surgeries (54 cheiloplasties and 61 palatoplasties). 11 complications were reported in this period: 2 dehiscences in cheiloplasty (3.70%), 1 hypertrophic scar in cheiloplasty (1.85%), 6 fistulas in palatoplasty (9.83%) and 2 dehiscences in palatoplasty (3.28%). The incidence of complications was 9.56% when analyzing the total number of surgeries, being 5.55% in patients undergoing cheiloplasty and 13.11% in patients undergoing palatoplasty.

Conclusion:

The incidence of complications during the initial years of structuring the service was similar to other studies in the literature.

Keywords:

Cleft palate - Cleft lip - Craniofacial abnormalities - Fistula - Postoperative complications

Institution: Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (EBSERH), Uberlândia, MG, Brazil.

Publication History

Received: 14 September 2023

Accepted: 04 February 2024

Article published online:
20 May 2025

• REFERÊNCIAS

• 1 Hlongwa P, Levin J, Rispel LC. Epidemiology and clinical profile of individuals with cleft lip and palate utilising specialised academic treatment centres in South Africa. PLoS One 2019; 14 (05) e0215931
• 2 Baigorri M, Crowley CJ, Sommer CL, Moya-Galé G. Barriers and Resources to Cleft Lip and Palate Speech Services Globally: A Descriptive Study. J Craniofac Surg 2021; 32 (08) 2802-2807
• 3 Schönmeyr B, Wendby L, Campbell A. Early Surgical Complications After Primary Cleft Lip Repair: A Report of 3108 Consecutive Cases. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2015; 52 (06) 706-710
• 4 Deshpande GS, Campbell A, Jagtap R, Restrepo C, Dobie H, Keenan HT, Sarma H. et al. Early complications after cleft palate repair: a multivariate statistical analysis of 709 patients. J Craniofac Surg 2014; 25 (05) 1614-1618
• 5 Schönmeyr B, Wendby L, Campbell A. Surgical Complications in 1408 Primary Cleft Palate Repairs Operated at a Single Center in Guwahati, Assam, India. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2016; 53 (03) 278-282
• 6 Park E, Deshpande G, Schonmeyr B, Restrepo C, Campbell A. Improved Early Cleft Lip and Palate Complications at a Surgery Specialty Center in the Developing World. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2018; 55 (08) 1145-1152
• 7 Ruslin M, Dom L, Tajrin A, Hajrah Yusuf AS, Arif SK, Tanra AH. et al. Establishing cleft services in developing countries: Complications of cleft lip and palate surgery in rural areas of Indonesia. Arch Plast Surg 2019; 46 (06) 511-517
• 8 Li F, Wang HT, Chen YY, Wu WL, Liu JY, Hao JS. et al. Cleft relapse and oronasal fistula after Furlow palatoplasty in infants with cleft palate: incidence and risk factors. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2017; 46 (03) 275-280
• 9 Schoenbrunner AR, Dalle Ore CL, Lance S, McIntyre J, Jones M, Gosman A. Effect of Surgeon Volume and Craniofacial Fellowship Training on Cleft Palate Complication Rates. Ann Plast Surg 2017; 78 (5 Suppl 4): S229-32
• 10 Gatti GL, Freda N, Giacomina A, Montemagni M, Sisti A. Cleft Lip and Palate Repair. J Craniofac Surg 2017; 28 (08) 1918-1924
• 11 Navarro CE. CIRPLAST: Cleft Lip and Palate Missions in Peru. J Craniofac Surg 2015; 26 (04) 1109-1111
• 12 Abulezz TA. Cleft Lip and Palate: An Experience of a Developing Center in Egypt. J Craniofac Surg 2017; 28 (08) e731-e4
• 13 Lin KY, Black JS, Wang JS, Kerpelman J, Ho TV, Borowitz K. An outcome study of a 2-flap pushback palatoplasty used in the treatment of wide cleft palates. J Craniofac Surg 2015; 26 (03) 620-624
• 14 Salimi N, Aleksejuuniene J, Yen E, Loo A. Time Trends and Determinants of Fistula in Cleft Patients at BC Children’s Hospital, Canada: A Retrospective 18-Year Medical Chart Audit. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2018; 55 (07) 1013-1019
• 15 Smyth AG, Wu J. Cleft Palate Outcomes and Prognostic Impact of Palatal Fistula on Subsequent Velopharyngeal Function-A Retrospective Cohort Study. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2019; 56 (08) 1008-1012
• 16 Tse RW, Siebold B. Cleft Palate Repair: Description of an Approach, Its Evolution, and Analysis of Postoperative Fistulas. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018; 141 (05) 1201-1214
• 17 Rodrigues HLR. Incidência de fistula após palatoplastia à Von Langenbeck com veloplastia intravelar estendida. Rev Bras Cir Plást 2015; 30 (04) 597-602
• 18 Menegazzo MR, Montoya CG, Gobetti L, Cano AC, Evensen AO, Saldanha O. Palatoplastia primária pela técnica de Von Langenbeck: experiência e resultados morfológicos obtidos em 278 casos operados. Rev Bras Cir Plást 2020; 35 (01) 16-22
• 19 Swanson MA, Auslander A, Morales T, Jedrzejewski B, Magee 3rd WP, Siu A. et al. Predictors of Complication Following Cleft Lip and Palate Surgery in a Low-Resource Setting: A Prospective Outcomes Study in Nicaragua. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2022; 59 (12) 1452-1460