Demystifying the deep plane facelift technique with anatomical dissection in fresh cadavers

▪ ABSTRACT

Introduction:

Anatomy studies on cadavers have allowed a better understanding of the structures of the face and, consequently, greater safety when exploring the deep planes of the facial region. A good technique must be safe, reproducible, and respect anatomical points. The objective of this work is to demystify the deep plane facelifting technique through the dissection of cadavers and exposure of facial structures.

Method:

The reproduction of the “deep plane facelifting” technique was performed on 14 hemifaces of 7 pieces of fresh cadavers at the Instituto de Treinamento de Cadáver (Cadaver Training Institute) in Curitiba in 2021. The surgical technique was performed according to our clinical practice and reproduced on the cadaver. After the procedure, the facial anatomical structures were dissected to correlate their positioning with the anatomical spaces of the face. The positioning of the facial ligaments, vascularization, and branches of the facial nerve were evaluated.

Results:

The anatomical spaces relevant to the deep plane facelifting technique were identified, such as the inferior and superior masseteric spaces, prezygomatic space, buccal space, and cervical space. The facial nerve branches were identified in the sub-SMAS plane and correlated with the anatomical spaces and planes.

Conclusion:

The deep plane facelift technique can be reproduced safely as long as two parameters are respected. The first is the correct entry into spaces to respect the anatomy. The second is the use of blunt detachers for dissection in the deep planes of the face to avoid nerve damage to the branches of the facial nerve.

Keywords:

Face - Rhytidoplasty - Facial nerve - Superficial musculoaponeurotic system - Skin aging

Institution: Instituto de Treinamento de Cadáver, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.

Publication History

Received: 15 December 2022

Accepted: 05 December 2023

Article published online:
20 May 2025

• REFERÊNCIAS

• 1 Mendelson BC, Freeman ME, Wu W, Huggings RJ. Surgical anatomy of the lower face: the premasseter space, the jowl and the labiomandibular fold. Aesthic Plast Surg 2008; 32 (02) 185-195
• 2 Mendelson BC, Wong CH. Surgical anatomy of the middle premasseter space and its application in the sub-SMAS face lift surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 132 (01) 57-64
• 3 Wong CH, Hsieh MKH, Mendelson B. The tear trough ligament: an anatomical basis for the tear trough deformity. Plastic Recontr Surg 2012; 129 (06) 1392-1402
• 4 Mendelson B, Wong CH. Facelift: Facial anatomy and aging. Rubin JP, Neligan PC. Plastic Surgery. 4th . 2. New York: Elsevier; 2017
• 5 O’ Brien JX, Rozen WM, Whitaker IS, Ashton MW. Lore’s fascia and the platysma-auricular ligament are distinct structures. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2012; 65 (09) e241-5
• 6 Mendelson BC, Jacobson SR. Surgical anatomy of the midcheek: facial layers, spaces, and the midcheek segments. Clin Plast Surg 2008; 35 (03) 395-404 ; discussion 393
• 7 Mendelson BC. Advances in understanding the surgical anatomy of the face. Eisenmann-Klein M, Neuhann- Lorenz C. Innovations in Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery. Chapter 18. New York: Springer Verlag; 2007: 141-145
• 8 Mendelson BC. Surgery of the superficial musculoaponeurotic system: principles of release, vectors, and fixation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 89 (03) 441-449 ; discussion 450-1
• 9 Jacono AA, Malone MH. The effect of Midline Corset Platysmaplasty on Degree of Face Lift Flap Elevation During Concomitant Deep-Plane Face-lift: A cadaveric study. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2016; 18 (03) 183-187
• 10 Stuzin JM, Baker TJ, Gordon HL. The relationship of the superficial and deep facial fascias: relevance to rhytidectomy and aging. Plast Reconstr Surg 1992; 89 (03) 441-449 ; discussion 450-1
• 11 Furnas DW. The retaining ligaments of the cheek. Plast Reconstr Surg 1989; 83 (01) 11-16
• 12 Viterbo F. Improved blunt dissectors for greater safety in face lift surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 131 (05) 858e-859e