Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-918597
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York
Behandlung von Karotisstenosen
Treatment of patients with carotid stenosisPublication History
eingereicht: 28.4.2005
akzeptiert: 30.6.2005
Publication Date:
27 October 2005 (online)

Glossar
ARR: Absolute Risikoreduktion
ECST: European Carotid Surgery Trial
NASCET: North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial
NNT: Number needed to treat
TEA: Thrombendarteriektomie
SPAC: Stentgeschützte perkutane Angioplastie der Karotis
Die invasive Behandlung einer Karotisstenose dient der primären oder sekundären Schlaganfallprävention, kann aber genau das Ereignis zur Folge haben, das durch die Behandlung verhindert werden soll. Deshalb sind die Risiken der invasiven Behandlung und des Spontanverlaufs sorgfältig gegeneinander abzuwägen. Die therapeutische Entscheidung stützt sich jeweils auf Daten randomisierter Studien. Dabei müssen aber die in diesen Studien verwendeten diagnostischen Kriterien (z. B. die Stenosegrad-Definition) und die therapeutischen Anforderungen (z. B. Operationsrisiko) genau beachtet bzw. eingehalten werden.
Literatur
- 1 Arning C. Nonatherosclerotic disease of the cervical arteries: Role of ultrasonography for diagnosis. VASA. 2001; 30 160-167
- 2 Arning C. Farbkodierte Duplexsonographie der hirnversorgenden Arterien. 3. Auflage, Stuttgart - New York: Thieme 2002
- 3 Arning C, Hammer E, Kortmann H. et al . Quantifizierung von A. carotis interna-Stenosen: Welche Ultraschallkriterien sind geeignet?. Ultraschall Med. 2003; 24 233-238
- 4 Arning C. Ultrasonographic criteria for diagnosing a dissection of the internal Carotid artery. Ultraschall Med. 2005; 26 24-28
- 5 Barnett H JM, Meldrum H E, Eliasziw M. for the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) Collaborators . The appropriate use of carotid endarterectomy. CMAJ. 2002; 166 1169-1179
- 6 Biller J, Feinberg W, Castaldo J E. et al . Guidelines for carotid endarterectomy. A statement for healthcare professionals from a special writing group of the Stroke Council, American Heart Association. Circulation. 1998; 97 501-509
- 7 CASANOVA Study Group . Carotid surgery versus medical therapy in asymptomatic carotid stenosis. Stroke. 1991; 22 1229-1235
- 8 ECST Collaborative Group . Risk of stroke in the distribution of an asymptomatic carotid artery. The European Carotid Surgery Trialists Collaborative Group. Lancet. 1995; 345 209-212
- 9 ECST Collaborative Group . Randomised trial of endarterectomy for recently symptomatic carotid stenosis: final results of the MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST). Lancet. 1998; 351 1379-1387
- 10 Executive Committee for the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study (ACAS) . Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. JAMA. 1995; 273 1421-1428
- 11 Habscheid W, Winkelmaier P. Schlaganfall-Therapie. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2004; 129 1869-1872
- 12 Hennerici M, Hülsbömer H B, Hefter H. et al . Natural history of asymptomatic extracranial arterial disease. Results of a long-term prospective study. Brain. 1987; 110 777-791
- 13 MRC Asymptomatic Carotid Surgery Trial (ACST) Collaborative Group . Prevention of disabling and fatal strokes by successful carotid endarterectomy in patients without recent neurological symptoms: randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2004; 363 1491-1502
- 14 North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators . Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med. 1991; 325 445-453
- 15 Rothwell P M, Gibson R J, Slattery J. et al . Equivalence of measurements of carotid stenosis. A comparison of three methods on 1001 angiograms. European Carotid Surgery Trialists’ Collaborative Group. Stroke. 1994; 25 2435-2439
- 16 Rothwell M, Eliasziw M, Gutnikov S A. et al . Analysis of pooled data from the randomised controlled trials for symptomatic carotid stenosis. Lancet. 2003; 361 107-116
- 17 Rothwell P M. With what to treat which patient with recently symptomatic carotid stenosis?. Practical Neurology. 2005; 5 68-83
- 18 Staikov I N, Arnold M, Mattle H P. et al . Comparison of the ECST, CC, and NASCET grading methods and ultrasound for assessing carotid stenosis. J Neurol. 2000; 247 681-686
- 19 Streifler J Y, Eliasziw M, Benavente O R. et al, for the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Group . Prognostic importance of leukoaraiosis in patients with symptomatic internal carotid artery stenosis. Stroke. 2002; 33 1651-1655
- 20 Winkelmaier P, Habscheid W. Schlaganfall-Diagnostik. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2004; 129 1866-1868
- 21 Yadav J S, Wholey M H, Kuntz R E. et al, for the Stenting and Angioplasty with Protection in Patients at High Risk for Endarterectomy (SAPPHIRE) Investigators . Protected carotid-artery stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2004; 351 1493-1501
Prof. Dr. med. Christian Arning
Abteilung Neurologie, Allgemeines Krankenhaus Wandsbek
Alphonsstraße 14
22043 Hamburg
Phone: 040/1818831413
Fax: 040/1818831631
Email: christian.arning@ak-wandsbek.lbk-hh.de