Placental Findings in Low-Risk, Singleton, Term Pregnancies after Uncomplicated Deliveries

Gary Ventolini; Ralph Samlowski; Dan L. Hood

doi:10.1055/s-2004-831882

American Journal of Perinatology, Inhaltsverzeichnis

Am J Perinatol 2004; 21(6): 325-328
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-831882

Placental Findings in Low-Risk, Singleton, Term Pregnancies after Uncomplicated Deliveries

Gary Ventolini¹ , Ralph Samlowski² , Dan L. Hood³

¹Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wright State University, Dayton, Ohio
²Department of Family Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Huntsville Campus, Birmingham, Alabama
³Clinical and Pathology Laboratories, Miami Valley Hospital, Dayton, Ohio

Abstract

Should all placentas be sent to pathology for examination after delivery room triage? A cohort of 88 placentas was prospectively obtained and examined from low-risk, singleton, term pregnancies after uneventful delivery. All patients had a normal prenatal testing and anatomy ultrasound. Fifty-one placentas (58%) were normal. Thirty-seven of the placental cohort (42%) had abnormal findings. Thirteen of the abnormal placentas (35.1%) showed pathology unassociated with fetal compromise. Twenty-four of the placentas (27.3% of the total cohort and 64.9% of the abnormal placentas) showed findings associated with fetal compromise. The most common pathologies were marginal cord insertion, chorioamnionitis, and abruption. Routine placental examination is not indicated, according to our data, in low-risk, singleton, and term pregnancy unless the placenta is determined to be abnormal at delivery examination.

KEYWORDS

Low-risk pregnancies - placental findings - placental pathology

Volltext

Referenzen

REFERENCES

1 College of American Pathologist . Conference XIX on the Examination of the Placenta: report of the Working Group on Indications for Placental Examination. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1991; 115 660-721
2 Langston C, Kaplan C, Macpherson T et al.. Practice guidelines for examination of the placenta. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1997; 121 449-476
3 Altshuler G. A conceptual approach to placental pathology and pregnancy outcome. Semin Diag Pathol. 1993; 10 204-221
4 Sun C C, Revell V O, Belli A J, Viscardi R M. Discrepancy in pathologic diagnosis of placental lesions. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2002; 126 706-709
5 Yetter J F. Examination of the placenta. Am Fam Phys. 1998; 57 1045-1054
6 Altshuler G. The role of the placenta in perinatal pathology (revised). Pediatr Pathol. 1996; 6 207-233
7 Driscoll S G. Placental examination in a clinical setting. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1991; 115 668-671
8 Salafia C M, Vintzileos A M. Why all placentas should be examined by a pathologist in 1990. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990; 163 1282-1293
9 ACOG Guidelines for Perinatal Care. 2nd ed. Elk Grove Village, IL; American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1988

Gary VentoliniM.D.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wright State University

128 E. Apple Street, CHE 3800

Dayton, OH 45409-2793