PDF herunterladen
Synlett 2003(9): 1279-1282
DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-40347
LETTER
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart ˙ New York

A Highly Efficient and Stereoselective Synthesis of Polyhydroxylated Pyrrolidines via Regioselective Asymmetric Aminohydroxylation (RAA) and Intramolecular Amidomercuration Reactions

Satwinder Singh, Dinesh Chikkanna, Om V. Singh, Hyunsoo Han*
Department of Chemistry, The University of Texas at San Antonio, 6900 N. Loop 1604 West, San Antonio, TX 78249, USA
Fax: +1(210)4584958; e-Mail: hhan@utsa.edu;
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Received 18 April 2003
Publikationsdatum:
30. Juni 2003 (online)

    Lizenzen und Reprints Alle Artikel dieser Rubrik

Abstract

A new synthetic strategy, which allows a complete stereo­chemical control of all four chiral centers of two important polyhydroxylated pyrrolidines 8 and 9, is described. The cornerstone of the present strategy is a successful implementation of the regioselective asymmetric aminohydroxylation (RAA) reaction of the designed achiral olefin 1 and the intramolecular stereoselective amidomercuration reaction of the δ-alkenylamide 4, which were used for the introduction of the vicinal amino alcohol functionality and for the construction of the five membered ring in the targets respectively.

Key words

carbohydrate - glycosidase inhibitor - polyhydroxylated pyrrolidine - regioselective asymmetric aminohydroxylation reaction - intramolecular amidomercuration reaction

    References

  • 1a Winchester B. Fleet GWJ. Glycobiology  1992,  2:  199 
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 1b Kennedy JF. White CA. Bioactive Carbohydrates in Chemistry, Biochemistry, and Biology   Halsted Press; New York: 1983. 
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2a Rhinehart BL. Robinson KM. Payne AJ. Wheatly ME. Fisher JL. Liu PS. Cheng W. Life Sci.  1987,  41:  2325 
    Google Scholar
  • 2b Anzeveno PB. Creemer LJ. Daniel JK. King CHR. Liu PS. J. Org. Chem.  1989,  54:  2539 
    Google Scholar
  • 2c Johnson PS. Lebovitz HE. Coniff RF. Simonson DC. Raskin P. Munera CL. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.  1998,  83:  1515 
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Ostrander GK. Scribner NK. Rohrschneider LR. Cancer Res.  1988,  48:  1091 
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Bitonti AJ, Sjoersma A, and McCann PP. inventors; Eur. Patent App., EP  423728. 
  • 5a Fleet GWJ. Karpas A. Dwek RA. Fellows LE. Tyms AS. Peturrson S. Namgoong SK. Ramsden NG. Smith PW. Son JC. Wilson F. Witty DR. Jacob GS. Rademacher TW. FEBS Lett.  1988,  237:  128 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 5b Gruters RA. Neefjes JJ. Tersmette M. de Goede REY. Tulp A. Huisman HG. Miedema F. Ploegh HL. Nature (London)  1987,  330:  74 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 6a Sinnott ML. Chem. Rev.  1990,  90:  1171 
    Google Scholar
  • 6b Heightman TD. Vasella AT. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.  1999,  38:  750 
    Google Scholar
  • 6c Zechel D. Withers SG. Acc. Chem. Res.  2000,  33:  11 
    Google Scholar
  • 7a Watson AA. Fleet GWJ. Asano N. Molyneux RJ. Nash RJ. Phytochemistry  2001,  56:  265 
    Google Scholar
  • 7b Asano N. Kuroi H. Ikeda K. Kizu H. Kameda Y. Kato A. Adachi I. Watson AA. Nash RJ. Fleet GWJ. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry  2000,  11:  1 
    Google Scholar
  • 7c Iminosugars as Glycosidase Inhibitors: Nojirimycin and Beyond   Stutz AE. Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 1999. 
    Google Scholar
  • 7d Carbohydrate Mimetics. Concepts and Methods   Chapleur Y. Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 1998. 
    Google Scholar
  • 7e Winchester B. Fleet GWJ. Glycobiology  1992,  2:  199 
    Google Scholar
  • 7f Ganem B. Acc. Chem. Res.  1996,  29:  340 
    Google Scholar
  • 7g Bols M. Acc. Chem. Res.  1998,  31:  1 
    Google Scholar
  • 7h Sears P. Wong C.-H. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.  1999,  38:  2301 
    Google Scholar
  • 8a Behr J.-B. Erard A. Guillerm G. Eur. J. Org. Chem.  2002,  1256 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 8b Denmark SE. Cottell JJ. J. Org. Chem.  2001,  66:  4276 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 8c White JD. Hrnciar P. J. Org. Chem.  2000,  65:  9129 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 8d Denmark SE. Hurd AR. J. Org. Chem.  2000,  65:  2875 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 8e Denmark SE. Herbert B. J. Org. Chem.  2000,  65:  2887 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 9a Toyao A. Tamura O. Takagi H. Ishibashi H. Synlett  2003,  35 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 9b Yamashita T. Yasuda K. Kizu H. Kameda Y. Watson AA. Nash RJ. Fleet GWH. Asano N. J. Nat. Prod.  2002,  65:  1875 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 10a Shi M. Satoh Y. Makihara T. Masaki Y. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry  1995,  6:  2109 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 10b Masaki Y. Oda H. Kazuta K. Usai A. Itoh A. Xu F. Tetrahedron Lett.  1992,  33:  5089 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 10c Gouverneur V. Ghosez L. Tetrahedron Lett.  1991,  32:  5349 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 10d Gouverneur V. Ghosez L. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry  1990,  1:  363 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 10e Ikegami S. Uchiyama H. Hayama T. Katsuki T. Yamaguchi M. Tetrahedron  1988,  44:  5333 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 10f For a review of C2-symmetric catalysts and ligands, see: Whitesell JK. Chem. Rev.  1989,  89:  1581 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 11 For a review for the formation of pyrrolidine rings, see: Pichon M. Figadere B. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry  1996,  7:  927 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • For more recent literatures for the synthesis and biological activity of I, see:
  • 12a Donohoe TJ. Headley CE. Cousins RPC. Cowley A. Org. Lett.  2003,  7:  999 
    Google Scholar
  • 12b Dondoni A. Giovannini PP. Perrone D. J. Org. Chem.  2002,  67:  7203 
    Google Scholar
  • 12c Cubero I. Plaza Lopez-Espinosa MT. Robles Diaz R. Franco Montalban F. Carbohydr. Res.  2001,  330:  401 
    Google Scholar
  • 12d Saotome C. Kanie Y. Kanie O. Wong C.-H. Bioorg. Med. Chem.  2000,  8:  2249 
    Google Scholar
  • 12e Colobert F. Tito A. Khiar N. Denni D. Medina MA. Martin-Lomas M. Ruano JG. Solladie G. J. Org. Chem.  1998,  63:  8918 
    Google Scholar
  • 12f Takayama S. Martin R. Wu J. Laslo K. Siuzdak G. Wong C.-H. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  1997,  119:  8146 
    Google Scholar
  • 12g Huwe CM. Blechert S. Synthesis  1997,  61 
    Google Scholar
  • 12h McCort I. Dureault A. Depezay J.-C. Tetrahedron Lett.  1996,  37:  7717 
    Google Scholar
  • 12i Asano N. Oseki K. Kizu H. Matsui K. J. Med. Chem.  1994,  37:  3701 
    Google Scholar
  • 12j Zou W. Szarek WA. Carbohydr. Res.  1993,  242:  311 
    Google Scholar
  • 12k Masaki Y. Oda H. Kazuta K. Usai A. Itoh A. Xu F. Tetrahedron Lett.  1992,  33:  5089 
    Google Scholar
  • 12l Kajimoto T. Chen L. Liu K.-C. Wong C.-H. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  1991,  113:  6678 
    Google Scholar
  • 12m Liu K.-C. Kajimoto T. Chen L. Wong C.-H. J. Org. Chem.  1991,  56:  6280 
    Google Scholar
  • 12n Huang RR. Straub JA. Whitesides GM. J. Org. Chem.  1991,  56:  3849 
    Google Scholar
  • 12o Dureault A. Portal M. Depezay JC. Synlett  1991,  225 
    Google Scholar
  • 12p Reitz AB. Baxter EW. Tetrahedron Lett.  1990,  31:  6777 
    Google Scholar
  • 12q Shing TKM. Tetrahedron  1988,  44:  7261 
    Google Scholar
  • 12r Fleet GWJ. Smith PW. Tetrahedron  1987,  43:  971 
    Google Scholar
  • 12s Card PJ. Hitz WD. J. Org. Chem.  1985,  50:  891 
    Google Scholar
  • For more recent literatures for the synthesis and biological activity of II, see:
  • 13a Sifferlen T. Defoin A. Streith J. Nouen DL. Tarnus C. Dosbaa I. Foglietti M.-J. Tetrahedron  2000,  56:  971 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 13b Qiao L. Murray BW. Shimazaki M. Schultz J. Wong C.-H. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  1996,  118:  7653 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 13c Wang Y.-F. Dumas DP. Wong C.-H. Tetrahedron Lett.  1993,  34:  403 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 13d Dumas DP. Kajimoto T. Liu K.-C. Wong C.-H. Berlowitz DB. Danishefsky SJ. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.  1992,  2:  33 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 13e Wong C.-H. Dumas DP. Ishikawa Y. Koseki K. Danishefsky SJ. Weston RW. Lowe JB. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  1992,  114:  7321 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 13f Ishikawa Y. Lin YC. Dumas DP. Shen G.-J. Garcia-Junceda E. Williams MA. Bayer R. Ketcham C. Walker LE. Paulson JC. Wong C.-H. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  1992,  114:  9283 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 13g Liu K.-C. Kajimoto T. Cheng L. Zhong Z. Ichikawa Y. Wong C.-H. J. Org. Chem.  1991,  56:  6280 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 14a Han H. Cho CW. Janda KD. Chem. Eur. J.  1999,  5:  1565 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 14b Han H. Yoon J. Janda KD. J. Org. Chem.  1998,  63:  2045 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 14c Singh OV. Han H. Tetrahedron Lett.  2003,  44:  2387 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 14d Han H. Yang H. Tetrahedron Lett.  2003,  44:  1567 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 14e For other similar approaches, see: Morgan AJ. Masse CE. Panek JS. Org. Lett.  1999,  1:  1949 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 14f Also see: Chuang C.-C. Vassar V. Ma Z. Geney R. Ojima I. Chirality  2002,  14:  151 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 15a Takahata H. Takehara H. Ohkubo N. Takefumi M. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry  1990,  1:  561 
    Google Scholar
  • 15b Harding KE. Marman TH. Nam D.-H. Tetrahedron Lett.  1988,  29:  1627 
    Google Scholar
  • 15c Harding KE. Marman TH. J. Org. Chem.  1984,  49:  2838 
    Google Scholar
  • 15d Hill CH. Whitesides GM. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  1974,  96:  870 
    Google Scholar
  • 16 Corey EJ. Guzman-Perez A. Noe MC. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  1995,  117:  10805 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Fukuyama T. Laird AA. Hotchkiss LM. Tetrahedron Lett.  1985,  26:  6291 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
18

The NMR data of 8 and 9 are consistent with those in the literatures (ref. [12j] for 8 and ref. [12m] for 9). For 8, 1H NMR (500 MHz, D2O) δ 3.73-3.77 (m, 2 H), 3.80-3.86 (m, 4 H), 4.20 (d, 2 H, J = 2.0 Hz); 13C NMR (125 MHz, D2O) δ 61.17, 66.58, 78.36. For 9, 1H NMR (500 MHz, D2O) δ 1.27 (d, 3 H, J = 7.0 Hz), 3.75 (dd, 1 H, J = 7.5 Hz, 10.5 Hz), 3.77-3.87 (m, 3 H), 4.06 (d, 1 H, J = 3.5 Hz), 4.26 (d, 1 H, J = 3.5Hz).