Download PDF
Synlett 2003(7): 1007-1011
DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-39301
LETTER
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart ˙ New York

Memory of Chirality in the Enantioselective Synthesis of β-Lactams Derived from Amino Acids. Influence of the Reaction Conditions

Mª Angeles Bonachea, Guillermo Gerona-Navarroa, Mercedes Martín-Martíneza, Mª Teresa García-Lópeza, Pilar Lópezb, Carlos Cativielab, Rosario González-Muñiz*a
a Instituto de Química Médica (CSIC), Juan de la Cierva 3, 28006 Madrid, Spain
e-Mail: iqmg313@iqm.csic.es;
b Departamento de Química Orgánica, ICMA, Universidad de Zaragoza-CSIC, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain
Further Information

Publication History

Received 26 February 2003
Publication Date:
20 May 2003 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints All articles of this category

Abstract

The asymmetric induction observed during cyclisation of N-benzyl-N-chloroacetyl-l-Phe derivatives to the corresponding S-enriched 2-azetidinones, ascribed to chirality memory, can be controlled by the appropriate choice of the base and solvent. Using the organic base BTPP, the ee values obtained in different solvents showed a good correlation with the AN solvent parameter, except for NMP. It seems that a combination of the solvent properties, rather than individual parameters, and the presence of enolate aggregates are decisive for final enantiomer distribution.

Key words

amino acids - memory of chirality - β-lactams - enantio­selectivity - AN solvent-depedency

    References

  • 1 Fuji K. Kawabata T. Chem.-Eur. J.  1998,  4:  373 
    Google Scholar
  • For examples of memory of chirality through enolate intermediates see:
  • 2a Kawabata T. Yahiro K. Fuji K. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  1991,  113:  9694 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 2b Kawabata T. Wirth T. Yahiro K. Suzuki H. Fuji K. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  1994,  116:  10809 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 2c Brewster AG. Frampton CS. Jayatissa J. Mitchell MB. Stoodley RJ. Vohra S. Chem. Commun.  1998,  299 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 2d Betts MJ. Pritchard RG. Schofield A. Stoodley RJ. Vohra S. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1  1999,  1067 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 2e Kawabata T. Suzuki H. Nagae Y. Fuji K. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.  2000,  39:  2155 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 2f Kawabata T. Chen J. Suzuki H. Nagae Y. Kinoshita T. Chancharunee S. Fuji K. Org. Lett.  2000,  2:  3883 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 2g Brewster AG. Jayatissa J. Mitchell MB. Schofield A. Stoodley RJ. Tetrahedron Lett.  2002,  43:  3919 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • On the chirality memory through carbenium ion chemistry:
  • 3a Matsumura Y. Shirakawa Y. Satoh Y. Umino M. Tanaka T. Maki T. Onomura O. Org. Lett.  2000,  2:  1689 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 3b Wanyoike GN. Onomura O. Maki T. Matsumura Y. Org. Lett.  2002,  4:  1875 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Radicals as reactive intermediates in memory of chirality processes:
  • 4a Sauer S. Schumacher A. Barbosa F. Giese B. Tetrahedron Lett.  1998,  39:  3685 
    Article in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 4b Giese B. Wettstein P. Stähelin C. Barbosa F. Neuburger M. Zehnder M. Wessig P. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.  1999,  38:  2586 
    Article in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 4c Buckmelter AJ. Kim AI. Rychnovsky SD. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  2000,  122:  9386 
    Article in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 4d Griesbeck AG. Kramer W. Lex J. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.  2001,  40:  577 
    Article in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 4e Griesbeck AG. Kramer W. Bartoschek A. Schmickler H. Org. Lett.  2001,  3:  537 
    Article in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 4f Griesbeck AG. Kramer W. Lex J. Synthesis  2001,  1159 
    Article in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Gerona-Navarro G. Bonache MA. Herranz R. García-López MT. González-Muñiz R. J. Org. Chem.  2001,  66:  3538 
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Oliveros L. López P. Minguillón C. Franco P. J. Liq. Chromatogr.  1995,  18:  1521 
    Google Scholar
  • 10a Schwesinger R. Willaredt J. Schlemper H. Keller M. Schmitt D. Fritz H. Chem. Ber.  1994,  127:  2435 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 10b O’Donnell MJ. Delgado F. Dominguez E. de Blas J. Scott WL. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry  2001,  12:  821 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Attempts to cyclize N-benzyl-N-chloroacetyl-l-Phe-O-t-Bu with DMAP resulted in the nucleophilic attack of the reactive to the chloroacetyl derivative (compound 4, 90%, Figure 2), as previously found for the cyclization of Trp analogues with DBU, see: Gerona-Navarro G. Bonache MA. Herranz R. García-López MT. González-Muñiz R. Synlett  2000,  1249 .Selected data for compound 4: HPLC: t R = 10.74 min [50:50, H2O/MeCN (0.05%TFA)]. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): major rotamer δ = 8.09 (d, 2 H, J = 7.8 Hz, pyridine), 7.32-7.12 (m, 10 H, Ph), 6.68 (d, 2 H, J = 7.8 Hz, pyridine), 5.46 (d, 1 H, J = 16.8 Hz, CH2N+), 5.33 (d, 1 H, J = 16.8 Hz, CH2N+), 4.72 (d, 1 H, J = 17.2 Hz, N-CH2), 4.39 (dd, 1 H, J = 8.8, 6.2 Hz, α-H), 4.25 (d, 1 H, J = 17.2 Hz, N-CH2), 3.25 (dd, 1 H, J = 14.9, 6.2 Hz, β-H), 3.17 (s, 6 H, NMe2), 3.07 (dd, 1 H, J = 14.9, 8.8 Hz, β-H), 1.31 (s, 9 H, t-Bu). 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): major rotamer δ = 168.29 (COO), 166.07 (CON), 156.34 (4-C, pyridine), 143.68 (2-C, 6-C, pyridine), 137.35, 135.32, 129.29, 128.91, 128.86, 127.91, 127.59, 126,79 (Ph), 107.14 (3-C, 4-C, pyridine), 82.22 (C, t-Bu), 63.09 (α-C), 58.71 (CH2N+), 51.41 (N-CH2), 40.48 (CH3N), 35.53 (β-C), 27.92 (CH3, t-Bu). MS (ES, positive mode): 475.6 (M+ + 1)
    Article in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 13 These results are atypical with respect to other alkylation reactions for which the use of polar solvents, like MeCN, resulted in almost racemic products: Belokon YN. Kochetkov KA. Churkina TD. Ikonnikov NS. Chesnokov AA. Larionov OV. Singh I. Parmar VS. Vyskocil S. Kagan HB. J. Org. Chem.  2000,  65:  7041 
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14a Taft RW. Kamlet MJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  1976,  98:  2886 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 14b Kamlet MJ. Abboud JL. Taft RW. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  1977,  99:  6027 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 16a Taft RW. Pienta NJ. Kamlet MJ. Arnett EM. J. Org. Chem.  1981,  46:  661 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 16b Malavolta L. Oliveira E. Cilli EM. Nakaie CR. Tetrahedron  2002,  58:  4383 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • It has been described that the enantioselectivity of the alkylation of Phe derivatives can be controlled by regulating the aggregate structure of chiral enolate intermediates:
  • 18a Kawabata T. Kawakami S. Fuji K. Tetrahedron Lett.  2002,  43:  1465 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 18b Kawabata T. Kawakami S. Shimada S. Fuji K. Tetrahedron  2003,  59:  965 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 19a Henderson KW. Dorigo AE. Liu Q.-Y. Williard PG. von Ragué Scheyer P. Bernstein PR. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  1996,  118:  1339 
    Google Scholar
  • 19b Asensio G. Alemán PA. Domingo LR. Medio-Simón M. Tetrahedron Lett  1998,  39:  3277 
    Google Scholar
  • 20 No memeory of chriality was observed in the photochmically-induced cyclization of phenylglyoxylamide to 3-hydroxy-β-lactams: Griesbeck AG. Heckroth H. Synlett  2002,  131 
    Article in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
7

Column OL-389. Eluent: hexane/acetone (96:4). Flow rate: 1.5 mL/min. UV detection at 220 nm. Isomer 2a: t R = 7.77 min. Isomer 2b: t R = 9.07 min.

8

A general procedure was as follows: Compound 1 (83 mg, 0.19 mmol) was dissolved in the corresponding solvent (0.7 mL) and treated, at r.t. and under Ar atmosphere, with the appropriate base (0.28 mmol). The reaction was monitored by TLC until complete disappearance of the starting material. The solution was evaporated, redissolved in EtOAc, washed with H2O, and dried over Na2SO4. After evaporation, the resulting residue was purified on a silica gel column using a gradient from 20 to 30% of EtOAc in hexane. The obtained compound 2ab was directly evaluated by chiral HPLC, or transformed into dipeptide derivatives 3a and 3b as described (ref. [5] ). For the phase transfer reactions, 3 equiv of NaOH and KOH, and 10 equiv of CsOH were respectively used.

9

BTPP: tert-Butylimino-tri(pyrrolidino)phosphorane. BEMP: 2-tert-Butylimino-2-diethylamino-1,3-dimethylperhydro1,3,2-diazaphosphorine.

12

Reaction of chloroacetyl derivative 1 with LHMDS afforded pyrrolidinone 5, which was characterized as its methoxy derivative 6 after treatment with diazomethane. The formation of compound 5 could be attributed to the initial generation of the amide enolate and a Dieckmann-type condensation of this enolate with the ester group, followed by enolisation of the resulting ketone (Figure [3] ).
Selected data for compound 6: 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.26 (m, 3 H, Ph), 7.05 (m, 2 H, Ph), 7.00 (d, 2 H, J = 8.6 Hz, Pmb), 6.80 (d, 2 H, J = 8.6 Hz, Pmb), 5.18 (d, 1 H, J = 15.1 Hz, 1-CH2), 4.16 (s, 3 H, OMe), 3.93 (dd, 1 H, J = 5.4, 4.1 Hz, 5-H), 3.83 (d, 1 H, J = 15.1 Hz, 1-CH2), 3.78 (s, 3 H, OMe), 3.13 (dd, 1 H, J = 14.3, 4.1 Hz, 5-CH2), 2.89 (dd, 1 H, J = 14.3, 5.4 Hz, 5-CH2). 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 167.4 (2-C), 164.22 (4-C), 159.07, 134.95, 130.05, 129.45, 129.04, 128.74, 127.32, 114.03 (Ar), 97.91 (3-C), 59.05 (OMe), 58.65 (5-C), 55.21 (OMe), 43.88
(5-CH2), 35.47 (1-CH2). MS (ES, positive mode): 358.2
(M+ + 1).

15

NMP was not included because really poor correlations were found. To the best of our knowledge, the AN value for 2-butanone has not been described.

17

Among all the solvents tested here, NMP has not only the highest donor number (DN) but also the biggest difference between AN and DN parameters. DN is a reasonably good measure of the ability of the solvent to serve as an electron-pair donor to solutes when oxygen bases are considered.