Download PDF
Synlett 2002(12): 2062-2064
DOI: 10.1055/s-2002-35567
LETTER
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Pyridazines. Part 30: [1] Palladium-Catalysed Synthesis of 5-Substituted 6-Phenyl-3(2H)-pyridazinones Asissted by a Retro-Ene Transformation

Alberto Coelho, Enrique Raviña, Eddy Sotelo*
Laboratorio de Química Farmacéutica, Departamento de Química Orgánica, Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, España
Fax: +34(98)1594912; e-Mail: qosotelo@usc.es;
Further Information

Publication History

Received 25 September 2002
Publication Date:
20 November 2002 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints All articles of this category

Abstract

The efficient one-pot functionalization, through pal­ladium-catalysed reactions, of position 5 of the 6-phenyl-3(2H)-pyridazinone system has been performed using a retro-ene-assisted fragmentation. This route allows access through a short synthetic sequence to several pharmacologically useful 3(2H)-pyridazinones.

Key words

pyridazinone - ene-adducts - palladium - catalysis

    References

  • 1 For the previous paper in this series, see: Sotelo E. Fraiz N. Yañez M. Terrades V. Laguna R. Cano E. Raviña E. Bioorg. Med. Chem.  2002,  10:  2873 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Frank H. Heinisch G. Pharmacologically Active Pyridazines, In Progress in Medicinal Chemistry   27:  Ellis GP. West GB. Elsevier; Amsterdam: 1990.  p.1-49  
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Raviña E. García-Mera G. Santana L. Orallo F. Calleja JM. Eur. J. Med. Chem.  1985,  20:  475 
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Raviña E. Terán C. Dominguez N. Masaguer CF. Arch. Pharm. (Weinheim)  1991,  324:  455 
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Gil Longo J. Laguna R. Verde I. Castro M. Orallo F. Fontenla J. Calleja JM. Raviña E. Terán C. J. Pharm. Sci.  1993,  82:  286 
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Laguna R. Montero A. Cano E. Raviña E. Sotelo E. Estévez I. Acta Pharmaceutica Hungarica  1996,  66:  S43 ; Chem. Abstr. 1997, 126, 165993
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Laguna R. Rodriguez-Liñares B. Cano E. Estévez I. Raviña E. Sotelo E. Chem. Pharm. Bull.  1997,  45:  1151 
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Montero-Lastres A. Fraiz N. Cano E. Laguna R. Estévez I. Raviña E. Biol. Pharm. Bull.  1999,  22:  1376 
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Sotelo E. Fraiz N. Yañez M. Laguna R. Cano E. Brea J. Raviña E. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.  2002,  10:  1575 
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Estévez I. Coelho A. Raviña E. Synthesis  1999,  1666 
    Article in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Coelho A. Sotelo E. Estévez I. Raviña E. Synthesis  2001,  871 
    Article in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Sotelo E. Raviña E. Synlett  2002,  223 
    Article in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 13a Zára-Kaczián E. Mátyus P. Heterocycles  1993,  36:  519 
    Google Scholar
  • 13b Haider N. Heinisch G. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1  1988,  401 
    Google Scholar
  • 13c Haider N. Geinisch G. Heterocycles  1989,  29:  1309 
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Greene T. Wuts GPM. Protective Groups in Organic Synthesis   3rd ed.:  Wiley; New York: 1999.  p.632 
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Sotelo E. Coelho A. Raviña E. Tetrahedron Lett.  2001,  42:  8633 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Ripoll J. Vallé Y. Synthesis  1993,  3:  659 
    Article in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
16

Representative Procedure for Preparation of Compound 2. A mixture of 1 (2.64 g, 0.105 mmol) and 35% formaldehyde (0.828 mL, 0.105 mmol) was flushed with argon for 5 min. The suspension was stirred and heated under reflux (oil bath 110 °C) under argon until the starting material had disappeared (24 h). The mixture was cooled and the suspension was concentrated to dryness under reduced pressure. The obtained solid was purified by column chromatography on silica gel (EtOAc-hexanes, 1:2). Physical and spectral data for compound 2: Yield: 89%, mp 237-238 °C. IR (KBr): 3100-3000, 1642 cm-1. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz): δ = 7.55-7.40 (m, 5 H, Ph), 5.58 (d,
J = 8.1 Hz, 2 H, CH2), 4.74 (t, J = 8.1 Hz, 1 H, OH).
13C NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz): δ = 159.6, 147.0, 134.9, 133.4, 131.7, 130.0, 129.6, 128.6, 77.1. HRMS (Autospec Micromass): m/z calcd for C11H9 BrN2O2 (M+): 279.9847. Found: 279.9859.

18

Representative Procedure for Suzuki Arylations on Compound 2. A mixture of 2 (0.45 g, 1.6 mmol), arylboronic acid (1.6 mmol), Pd(PPh3)4 (0.036 g, 0.032 mmol) and Na2CO3 (0.67 g, 6.4 mmol) in 18 mL of 3:1 DME-H2O was flushed with argon for 5 min. The mixture was stirred and heated under reflux (oil bath 120 °C) under argon until the starting material had disappeared. The mixture was cooled and the solution was concentrated to dryness under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by column chromatography on silica gel.

19

Representative Procedure for Sonogashira Couplings on Compound 2. A mixture of 2 (0.28 g, 1.0 mmol), acetylene derivative (1.5 mmol), Pd(PPh3)2Cl2 (0.03 g, 0.01 mmol), CuI (0.01 g, 0.01 mmol) and anhyd triethylamine (0.282 mL, 2.0 mmol) in 10 mL of DMF was flushed with argon for
5 min. The reaction mixture was stirred and heated (oil bath 55 °C) under argon until the starting material had dis-appeared. The reaction mixture was cooled and the solution was concentrated to dryness under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by column chromatography on silica gel.

20

Selected Physical and Spectral Data for Representative Compounds 3. 3a: Yield: 90%. IR (KBr): 3100-2923, 1668, 1589 cm-1. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz): δ = 11.58 (br s, 1 H, NH), 7.38-7.20 (m, 10 H, phenyl), 7.01 (s, 1 H, H4). 3b: Yield: 78%., IR (KBr): 3500-2924, 1642 cm-1. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz): δ = 11.40 (br s, 1 H, NH), 7.41-7.29 (m, 5 H, phenyl), 7.18 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2 H, phenyl), 7.06 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2 H, phenyl), 7.01 (s, 1 H, H4), 2.33 (s, 3 H, CH3). 3c: Yield: 78%. IR (KBr): 3500-2924, 1642 cm-1. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz): δ = 11.65 (br s, 1 H, NH), 7.40-7.30 (m, 5 H, Arom), 7.16 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2 H, Arom), 7.05 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, Arom), 6.97 (s, 1 H, H4). 3e: Yield: 70%. IR (KBr): δ = 3000-3100, 2136, 1654 cm-1. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz): δ = 12.46 (br s, 1 H), 7.73 (m, 2 H, Arom), 7.42 (m, 3 H, Arom), 7.13 (s, 1 H), 0.16 (s, 9 H, 3 × CH3). 3f: Yield: 86%. IR (KBr): 3100, 1680 cm-1. 1H NMR (MeOD, 300 MHz): δ = 13.18 (br s, 1 H, NH), 7.75 (m, 2 H, Arom), 7.47 (m, 3 H, Arom), 7.16 (s, 1 H, H4), 4.35 (s, 2 H, CH2), 3.34 (t, 1 H, J = 1.6 Hz, OH). 3g: Yield: 81%. IR (KBr): 3246-2885, 2236, 1667, 1053 cm-1. 1H NMR (MeOD, 300 MHz): δ = 12.40 (br s, 1 H, NH), 7.70-7.64 (m, 2 H, Arom), 7.42-7.37 (m, 3 H, Arom), 7.17 (s, 1 H, H4), 5.35 (s, 1 H, CH), 3.52 (m, 4 H, 2 × OCH2), 1.15 (m, 6 H, 2 × CH3). 3h: Yield: 86%. IR (KBr): 1669, 1092 cm-1. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz): δ = 12.68 (br s, 1 H, NH), 7.43 (m, 5 H, Arom), 7.11 (s, 1 H, H4), 6.45 (dd, 1 H, J = 10.9, 17.2 Hz, CH=CH2), 5.87 (d, 1 H, J = 17.2 Hz, CH=CH2), 5.50 (d, 1 H, J = 10.9 Hz, CH=CH2).