Synlett 2002(2): 0251-0254
DOI: 10.1055/s-2002-19768
LETTER
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

An Improved Sonogashira Coupling Procedure for the Construction of Rigid Aromatic Multifunctional Monomers Bearing 1,3-Substituted Acetylenic Units

Louise Davidsona, Keith W. Freebairnb, Andrew T. Russella, Harish S. Trivedib, Wayne Hayes*a
a Department of Chemistry, The University of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading, Berkshire, RG6 6AD, UK
b GlaxoSmithKline, Medicines Research Centre, Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2NY, UK
Fax: +44(118)9316331; e-Mail: w.c.hayes@reading.ac.uk;
Further Information

Publication History

Received 4 November 2001
Publication Date:
02 February 2007 (online)

Abstract

The efficient synthesis of rigid multifunctional vinylic monomers 1 and 2 from 3,5-dibromobenzene derivatives and propargyl alcohol via the Sonogashira reaction is reported. For example, a series of 3,5-bis(3-hydroxyprop-1-ynl)benzoate ester derivatives have been prepared efficiently using an improved palladium catalyst system. Subsequent hydrolysis and reaction with 4-vinylaniline afforded a new monomer 2 for use in functional macroporous polymer systems. In addition, Sonogashira and Wittig methodologies have been optimised in order to construct successfully an alternative rigid monomer 1 from 3,5-dibromobenzaldehyde.

16

Typical Procedure for the Preparation of 6a: Bisbenzonitriledichloropalladium (75 mg, 0.20 mmol) and copper iodide (25 mg, 0.10 mmol) were added to a dry round bottomed flask which was purged with argon and filled with dry THF (10 mL). Tri-2-furylphoshine (94 mg, 0.40 mmol) and triethylamine (1.1 mL, 7.80 mmol) were added, followed by 3,5-dibromobenzoic acid ethyl ester (1.01 g, 3.30 mmol). The reaction was stirred at r.t. for 20 min. Propargyl alcohol (0.55 g, 9.80 mmol) was added gradually over 20 min, and the reaction was refluxed under argon for 10 h. The residue of palladium salts was filtered and washed with THF. The combined filtrate and washings were evaporated under reduced pressure. The residue was taken up in chloroform (50 mL) and washed with 1 M hydrochloric acid (20 mL) followed by brine (2 × 20 mL). The combined organic layers were dried over sodium sulfate, filtered at the pump and concentrated in vacuo to yield a brown oil. Subsequent purification using column chromatography (SiO2, 6:4 CH2Cl2:EtOAc) afforded a white solid (mp 163-164 °C, 0.351 g, 42%). 1H NMR (250 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 1.17 (t, 3 H, J = 7.1 Hz, CH3), 4.22 (q, 2 H, J = 7.1 Hz, CH2), 4.42 (s, 4 H, 2 × CH2), 7.43 (t, 1 H, J = 1.6 Hz, ArH), 7.86 (d, 2 H, J = 1.6 Hz, ArH). 13C NMR (67.5 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 13.2 (CH3), 50.2 (2 CH2), 60.6 (CH2), 82.5 (2 × C≡C), 88.1 (2 × C≡C), 122.3 (2 × ArCH), 129.7 (ArCH), 131.3 (2 × ArC-C), 137.3 (ArC-COOEt), 164.4 (C=O); IR: νmax 666, 723, 1414, 1462, 1585, 1735, 2354, 2856, 2923 cm-1; m/z (TOF MS ES+) mobile phase 70:30 CH3CN:0.05 M NH4OAc(aq), flow injection: calculated for C15H14O4 258.2732, found 792.3010 [3 M + NH4]+, 534.2120 [2 M + NH4]+, 517.1837 [2 M + H]+, 481.1641 [2 M + H - 2 H2O]+, 300.1233 [MH + CH3CN]+, 259.0965 [MH+].