Purpose: CABG with bilateral IMA grafts (BIMA) can improve long-term results in cardiac morbidity
and mortality. An enhanced incidence of bleeding and wound complications compared
to patients with single IMA (SIMA) remains a matter of debate. The aim of the study
was to compare the operative outcomes of patients who had undergone CABG with BIMA
and SIMA in situ grafts, especially to identify patient-related risk factors, such as obesity, diabetes
mellitus and age above 70 years. Methods: Out of a total of 5,144 patients operated on between January 1996 and September
1999, patients with isolated CABG (n = 3,671) with BIMA or SIMA were analyzed retrospectively.
In the BIMA group, the patients' (n = 1,487) mean age was 64.0 years; mean EF was
62.1 %. In the SIMA group (n = 2,184), the mean age was 65.4 years and mean EF 60.6
% (n. s.). In the BIMA group, the right IMA was anterior of the aorta to the LAD,
the left IMA to the lateral wall. In the SIMA group, the LAD was revascularisized
with the left IMA. Additional bypasses were performed with vein grafts. Results: The 30-day lethality was 1.6 % in the BIMA group, 1.7 % in the SIMA group in patients
under 70, and 4.1 % (BIMA) and 4.0 % (SIMA) in patients over 70 (p = n. s.). A
significantly higher blood loss was observed in the BIMA group (BIMA 979 ± 708 ml,
SIMA 790 ± 575 ml, p < 0.05). The rethoracotomy rate due to bleeding was significantly
higher in patients with BIMA (4.1 %) compared to those with SIMA (2.5 %, p < 0.05).
In patients with a body mass index (BMI) of less than 27, no significant difference
could be found (SIMA 2.8 %, BIMA 3.4 %, p = n. s.). Patients with a BMI > 27 showed
a significantly higher rethoracotomy rate (SIMA 2.2 %, BIMA 4.9 %). A higher incidence
of sternal instabilities could be observed in the BIMA group (4.2 %, p < 0.05). Diabetes mellitus could not be identified as an independent risk factor
for sternal complications (SIMA 2.9 %, BIMA 5.0 %, p = n. s.). Couclusion: CABG using both IMA's can be performed in nearly all patients as a routine method
with good clinical results and low mortality. Bleeding in the BIMA group within 48
hours was increased. BMI > 27 could be identified as a risk factor for sternal complications,
but not diabetes mellitus or age over 70 years.
Key words:
Coronary artery disease - Arterial revascularization - Bilateral JMA grafting
References
1
Loop F D, Lytle B W, Cosgrove D M, Stewart R W, Goormastic M, Williams G W, Golding L A R,
Gill C C, Taylor P C, Sheldon W C, Proudfit W L.
Influence of the internal mammary artery graft on 10-year survival and other cardiac
events.
N Eng J Med.
1986;
314
1-6
2
Grondin C M, Campell L, Lesperance J, Enjalbert M, Bourassa M.
Comparison of Iater changes in internal mammary artery and saphenous vein grafts in
two consecutive series of patients 10 years after operation.
Circulation.
1984;
70
2208-2221
3
Lytle B W, Loop F D, Cosgrove D. et al .
Longterm (5 - 12 years) serial studies of internal mammary artery and saphenous vein
coronary bypass grafts.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg.
1985;
89
248-258
4
Lytle B W, Cosgrove D M.
Coronary artery bypass surgery.
Curr Probl Surg.
1992;
29
737-807
5
Barner H B, Barnett M G.
Fifteen- to twenty-one-year angiographic assessment of internal thoracic artery as
a bypass conduit.
Ann Thorac Surg.
1994;
57
1526-1528
6
Cameron A, Davies K B, Green G E.
Coronary bypass surgery with internal thoracic artery grafts. Effects on survival
over a 15-year period.
N Engl J Med.
1996;
334
216-219
7
Schmidt S E, Jones J W, Thornby J I, Miller C C, Beall A C.
Improved survival with multiple left-sided bilateral internal thoracic artery grafts.
Ann Thorac Surg.
1997;
64
9-15
8
Chow M S T, Sim E, Orszulak T A, Schaff H V.
Patency of internal thoracic artery grafts: Comparison of right versus left and importance
of vessel grafted.
Circulation.
1994;
90
(Part 2)
II-129-132
9
Jones J W, Ochsner J L, Mills N L.
The internal mammary bypass graft: a superior second coronary artery.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg.
1978;
75
625-631
10
Pick A W, Osrzulak T A, Anderson B J, Schaff H V.
Single versus bilateral internal mammary artery grafts: 10 year outcome analysis.
Ann Thorac Surg.
1997;
64
599-605
11
Lytle B W, Blackstone E H, Loop F D, Houghtaling P L, Arnold J H, Akhrass R, McCarthy P M,
Cosgrove D M.
Two internal thoracic artery grafts are better than one.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg.
1999;
117
855-872
12
Earner H B.
Double internal mammary-coronary artery bypass graft.
Arch Surg.
1974;
102
627-631
13
Lytle B W, Cosgrove D M, Loop F D, Borsh J, Goormastic M, Taylor P C.
Perioperative risk of bilateral internal mammary artery grafting: analysis of 500
cases from 1971 to 1984.
Circulation.
1986;
74
(Suppl. III)
37-41
14
Dewar L R S, Jamieson W R E, Janusz M T, Adelisardo M, Germann E, MacNab J S, Tyers F O.
Unilateral versus bilateral internal mammary revascularisation, survival and event-free
performance.
Circulation.
1995;
92
(Suppl. II)
118-1113
15
Calafiore A M.
Total arterial myocardial revascularisation.
Thorac Cardiovasc Surgeon.
1997;
45
105-108
16
Sergeant P T, Blackstone E H, Meyns B P.
Does arterial revascularisation degree the risk of infarction after coronary artery
bypass grafting?.
Ann Thorac Surg.
1998;
66
1-11
17
Dietl C A, Benoit C H, Gilbert C L. et al .
Which is the graft of choice for the right coronary and posterior descending arteries?
Comparison of the right internal mammary artery and the right gastroepiploic artery.
Circulation.
1995;
92
(Suppl: II)
92-97
18
Mestree C A, Rives A, Iqual A.
Atherosclerosis of the internal mammary artery; histopathological analyses and implications
of its results in coronary artery bypass graft surgery.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg.
1986;
34
356-358
19
Van Son J A, Smedts F, Vincent J G, Lier H J, Kibat K.
Comparative anatomic studies of various arterial conduits for myocardial revascularization.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg.
1990;
99
703-707
20
Bamer H B, Kaiser G C, Jelinek M. et al .
Aortocoronary veingraft and internal mammary-coronary anastomosis.
Arch Surg.
1972;
105
908-911
21
Fiore A C, Naunheim K S, Dean P. et al .
Results of internal thoracic artery grafting over 15 years: Single versus double grafts.
Ann Thorac Surg.
1990;
49
202-209
22
Kouchoukas N T, Wareing T H, Murphy S F. et al .
Risks of bilateral internal mammary artery bypass grafting.
Annthorac Surg.
1990;
49
210-229
23
Sergeant P, Lesaffre E, Flameng W. et al .
Internal mammary artery: methods of use and their effect on survival after coronary
artery bypass.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg.
1990;
4
72-78
24
Naunheim K S, Bamer H B, Fiore A C.
Results of internal thoracic artery grafting over 15 years: Single versus double grafts
(Update).
Ann Thorac Surg.
1992;
53
716-718
25
Gansera B, Haschemi A, Angelis I, Eichinger W, Breuer M, Keiditsch E, Kemkes B M.
Cardiac Surgery in Patients with Previous Carcinoma of the Breast and Mediastinal
Irradiation: Is the Internal Thoracic Artery Graft obsolete ?.
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg.
1999;
47
376-380
26
Breuer M, Gansera B, Kiask T, Kemkes B M.
Cardiac Surgery in Patients with Dialysis-Dependent Renal Failure: Routine or Risk?.
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg.
2000;
48
(Suppl I)
90
1 Presented at the 3rd Joint Meeting of the German, the Austrian and the Swiss Societies for Thoracic and
Cardiovascular Surgery, February 9 - 12, 2000 Lucerne
Brigitte GanseraMD
Klinikum München-Bogenhausen Abteilung für Kardiovaskularchirurgie
Englschalkinger Straße 77
81925 München
Germany
Phone: 089/92702631
Fax: 089/92702605