The impact of exercise prescription variables on intervention outcomes in low back pain disorders: an umbrella review of systematic reviews

Einleitung Low back pain is the leading contributor to the global disability and healthcare burden [1]. An increasing number of systematic reviews consistently demonstrated that exercise training improves physical function in individuals with low back pain [2] [3]. However, information about the optimal exercise prescription variables (e.g. duration, frequency) including methodological quality of the available evidence are mostly lacking [4]. Sub-optimal exercise prescription may increase injury risks and reduce potential for improvement. Therefore, we aimed to examine reporting of exercise prescription variables, assess methodological quality and exercise prescription recommendations in systematic reviews and meta-analyses of low back pain disorders.

Material und Methodik We conducted a prospectively registered umbrella review of systematic reviews (CRD42021287440) for musculoskeletal diagnosis and focused here on low back pain. Peer-reviewed, English language journal articles were searched from inception to 14th February 2023 using the electronic databases of PubMed, SPORTDiscus, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, EMBASE, and CINAHL. We included systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials that compared exercise training to non-pharmacological, non-surgical conservative treatment, placebo, usual care, true control or other active exercise interventions for altering physical function, pain, and mental health in adults with musculoskeletal pain. Data were extracted from the following group of reviews: (1) those that did not report any exercise prescription data, and (2) those that performed a quantitative analysis of the relationship between exercise prescription variables and outcomes. AMSTAR-2 was used to assess methodological quality.

Ergebnisse From 6757 records, 274 systematic reviews were included for musculoskeletal pain, of which 72 represented evidence for low back pain. Seven (9.7%) reviews did not report any exercise prescription data, while 11 (15.3%) quantitatively analyzed the relationship between prescription variables and the outcome(s). Exercise duration (N=65) and frequency (N=54) were the most commonly reported prescription variables. Of the 11 reviews, all assessed pain and physical function, but only one reviewed mental health and these reviews revealed limited evidence for an optimal dose. The overall methodological quality was rated as 'low or critically low' in 93.1% of reviews.

Zusammenfassung Our review highlights the lack of high methodological quality evidence for optimal exercise training prescription variables for individuals with low back pain. Most reviews assessed only one type of exercise training mode and evaluated dose as categorical rather than continuous data. Exercise training dose recommendations varied among included reviews when prescribing exercise training.

Publication History

Article published online:
21 May 2025

• Literatur

• 1 Wu A, March L, Zheng X. et al. Global low back pain prevalence and years lived with disability from 1990 to 2017: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Ann Transl Med 2020; 8: 299
• 2 Hayden JA, Ellis J, Ogilvie R. et al. Exercise therapy for chronic low back pain. CochraneDatabaseSystRev 2021; 9: CD009790
• 3 Anheyer D, Haller H, Lauche R. et al. Yoga for treating low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pain Published Online First 2021;
• 4 Owen PJ, Miller CT, Mundell NL. et al. Which specific modes of exercise training are most effective for treating low back pain? Network meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med 2020; 54: 1279-87