Synthesis 2024; 56(17): 2663-2669
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1775370
paper
Special Issue Flow Chemistry

Rapid and Mild Nucleophilic Substitution of a Highly Active (Indol-2-yl)methyl Electrophile in a Microflow Reactor

Shinichiro Fuse
,
Yuma Matsuura
,
Naoto Yamasaki
This work was partially supported by the Platform Project for Supporting Drug Discovery and Life Science Research (Basis for Supporting Innovative Drug Discovery and Life Science Research (BINDS)) from Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) under Grant Number JP23ama121044, and Moonshot R&D Program from Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST) under Grant Number JPMJMS2236.


Abstract

Indoles are common motifs in functional agricultural and pharmaceutical molecules. Heteroatom alkylation is the most frequently used chemical reaction in the pharmaceutical field. Developing protocols for the nucleophilic substitution of (indol-2-yl)methyl electrophiles is important for functionalizing indoles. There are few studies on the nucleophilic substitution at the 2′-position of the electrophiles without an electron-withdrawing group at the 1-position or substituents at the 2′- and 3-positions, where the existing approaches require high temperatures and long reaction times. In this study, we demonstrated rapid (7–12 s) and mild (25 °C) microflow nucleophilic substitution at the 2′-position of indole derivatives without an electron-withdrawing group at the 1-position and substituents at the 2′- or 3-positions. Comparable batch conditions resulted in a lower yield.

Supporting Information



Publication History

Received: 09 April 2024

Accepted after revision: 17 May 2024

Article published online:
13 June 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

    • 1a Welsch ME, Snyder SA, Stockwell BR. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2010; 14: 347
    • 1b Shearer J, Castro JL, Lawson AD. G, MacCoss M, Taylor RD. J. Med. Chem. 2022; 65: 8699
    • 2a Kochanowska-Karamyan AJ, Hamann MT. Chem. Rev. 2010; 110: 4489
    • 2b Lancianesi S, Palmieri A, Petrini M. Chem. Rev. 2014; 114: 7108
    • 2c Kumar S. Ritika, Future J. Pharm. Sci. 2020; 6: 121
  • 3 Schneider N, Lowe DM, Sayle RA, Tarselli MA, Landrum GA. J. Med. Chem. 2016; 59: 4385
  • 4 Arcadi A, Berden G, Ciogli A, Corinti D, Crestoni ME, De Angelis M, Fabrizi G, Goggiamani A, Iazzetti A, Marrone F, Marsicano V, Oomens J, Serraiocco A. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2022; e202201166
  • 5 Dhayalan V, Ramesh N, Mohanakrishnan AK. Synth. Commun. 2009; 39: 1241
    • 6a Siles R, Kawasaki Y, Ross P, Freire E. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2011; 21: 5305

    • Nucleophilic substitution at the 2′-position of 2-(bromomethyl)-1-methyl-indole was reported, but the detailed procedure and the yield were not presented, see:
    • 6b Kim N, Meyers KM, Mendez-Andino JL, Warshakoon NC, Ji W, Wos JA, Colson A, Mitchell MC, Davis JR, Pinney BB, Reizes O, Hu XE. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2006; 16: 5445

      For recent selected reviews of continuous flow synthesis, see:
    • 7a Baumann M, Baxendale IR. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2015; 11: 1194
    • 7b Rossetti I, Compagnoni M. Chem. Eng. J. 2016; 296: 56
    • 7c Porta R, Benaglia M, Puglisi A. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2016; 20: 2
    • 7d Plutschack MB, Pieber B, Gilmore K, Seeberger PH. Chem. Rev. 2017; 117: 11796
    • 7e Britton J, Raston CL. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017; 46: 1250
    • 7f Shukla CA, Kulkarni AA. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2017; 13: 960
    • 7g Fanelli F, Parisi G, Degennaro L, Luisi R. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2017; 13: 520
    • 7h Suryawanshi PL, Gumfekar SP, Bhanvase BA, Sonawane SH, Pimplapure MS. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2018; 189: 431
    • 7i Souza JM. D, Galaverna R, de Souza AA. N, Brocksom TJ, Pastre JC, de Souza RO. M. A, Oliveira KT. D. An. Acad. Bras. Ciênc. 2018; 90: 1131
    • 7j Ramanjaneyulu BT, Vishwakarma NK, Vidyacharan S, Adiyala PR, Kim D.-P. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 2018; 39: 757
    • 7k Gérardy R, Emmanuel N, Toupy T, Kassin V.-E, Tshibalonza NN, Schmitz M, Monbaliu J.-CM. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2018; 2301
    • 7l Guidi M, Seeberger PH, Gilmore K. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2020; 49: 8910

    • For selected publications on flash chemistry, see:
    • 7m Yoshida J.-i, Nagaki A, Yamada T. Chem. Eur. J. 2008; 14: 7450
    • 7n Yoshida J.-i. Flash Chemistry: Fast Organic Synthesis in Microsystems. Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 2008
    • 7o Yoshida J.-i. Chem. Rec. 2010; 10: 332
    • 7p Yoshida J.-i, Saito K, Nokami T, Nagaki A. Synlett 2011; 1189
    • 7q Yoshida J.-i, Takahashi Y, Nagaki A. Chem. Commun. 2013; 49: 9896

    • For pioneering and recent works on flow microsynthesis using highly reactive carbocations, see:
    • 7r Suga S, Okajima M, Fujiwara K, Yoshida J.-i. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001; 123: 7941
    • 7s Takumi M, Sakaue H, Nagaki A. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2022; 61: e202116177
    • 8a Masui H, Kanda S, Fuse S. Commun. Chem. 2023; 6: 47

    • We also reported nucleophilic addition of alkyllithiums to indole-3-carbaldehydes and subsequent nucleophilic substitution at the 3′-position, see:
    • 8b Fuse S, Kanda S, Masui H. Chem. Asian J. 2023; 19: e202300909

    • We recently reported highly electrophilic cation generation from diarylmethanols and furfuryl alcohols and their use for subsequent nucleophilic substitutions, see:
    • 8c Matsuura Y, Fuse S. Chem. Commun. 2024; 60: 2497
    • 8d Matsuura Y, Fuse S. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2024; 22: 3448
  • 9 The temperature was fixed at 25 °C because the reaction did not complete at lower temperature conditions in the similar reaction using (1H-indol-3-yl)methanol with higher reactivity comparing with 1a (ref. 8a). In addition, we observed clogging of the reaction channel by extending reaction time even at 25 °C probably due to over reactions (Table 2, entry 4). Therefore we did not examine higher temperature conditions that presumably cause over-reactions.
    • 10a Otake Y, Nakamura H, Fuse S. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018; 57: 11389
    • 10b Asano S, Kudo S, Hayashi J.-I. Chem. Eng. J. 2024; 489: 151183
    • 10c A T-shape mixer with narrower reaction channel has a higher mixing efficiency than that with wider reaction channel, see: Lobasov AS, Minakov AV, Kuznetsov VV, Rudyak VY, Shebeleva AA. Chem. Eng. Process. 2018; 134: 105
  • 11 Li C, Zhang H.-H, Fan T, Shen Y, Wu Q, Shi F. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2016; 14: 6932
  • 12 Murar CE, Thuaud F, Bode JW. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014; 136: 18140
  • 13 Reddy CR, Reddy MD, Srikanth B. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2012; 10: 4280
  • 14 Braga SF. P, Martins LC, da Silva EB, Sales Júnior PA, Murta SM. F, Romanha AJ, Soh WT, Brandstetter H, Ferreira RS, de Oliveira RB. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2017; 25: 1889
  • 15 Dethe DH, Erande RD, Ranjan A. J. Org. Chem. 2013; 78: 10106
  • 16 Huang L, Xun X, Zhao M, Xue J, Li G, Hong L. J. Org. Chem. 2019; 84: 11885
  • 17 Cacchi S, Fabrizi G, Goggiamani A, Molinaro C, Verdiglione R. J. Org. Chem. 2014; 79: 401
  • 18 Sujeevan Reddy G, Sandeep Kumar J, Thirupataiah B, Amirul Hossain K, Babu Nallapati S, Bhat Giliyaru V, Chandrashekhar Hariharapura R, Gautham Shenoy G, Pal M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2021; 77: 153213
  • 19 Mitra T, Das S, Basak A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009; 50: 5846
  • 20 Zhou H, Zhu D, Xing Y, Huang H. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2010; 352: 2127