Eur J Pediatr Surg 2022; 32(01): 127-131
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1742663
Original Article

Comparison of Optical Forceps-Assisted Single-Port Laparoscopic PIRS and Open Surgery in Morgagni Hernia Repair

1   Department of Pediatric Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University, Ankara, Turkey
,
1   Department of Pediatric Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University, Ankara, Turkey
,
Hayal Doruk
2   Department of Pediatric Surgery, Ankara City Hospital, Children's Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
,
Tuğba Örnek Demir
2   Department of Pediatric Surgery, Ankara City Hospital, Children's Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
,
Sabri Demir
2   Department of Pediatric Surgery, Ankara City Hospital, Children's Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
,
Ahmet Ertürk
2   Department of Pediatric Surgery, Ankara City Hospital, Children's Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
,
Elif Emel Erten
2   Department of Pediatric Surgery, Ankara City Hospital, Children's Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
,
Müjdem Nur Azılı
3   Department of Pediatric Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University, Ankara, Turkey
,
Emrah Şenel
4   Department of Pediatric Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University, Ankara, Turkey
› Institutsangaben

Funding This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Preview

Abstract

Introduction This study aimed to compare the results of classical surgery (CS) and optical forceps-assisted single-port laparoscopic percutaneous internal ring suturing (SP-PIRS) repair for the treatment of Morgagni hernia.

Materials and Methods Patients with Morgagni hernia who were operated on between January 2005 and July 2020 were included in the study. Patients were divided into two groups (CS or SP-PIRS) and compared retrospectively in terms of demographic data, defect size, duration of hospitalization, costs, postoperative complications, and recurrence.

Results Thirty-two patients were included in this study. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in terms of gender, defect size, postoperative complications, and recurrence (p > 0.05). The SP-PIRS group had a shorter operation time (p < 0.01), shorter hospital stay (p = 0.02), and lower cost (p < 0.01) than the CS group. The average follow-up was 24 months, and recurrence was detected in two patients in each group.

Conclusion SP-PIRS repair is recommended because it is practical to perform and reduces the duration of surgery, hospital stay, and cost. It is superior to other laparoscopic techniques, as there is no need to use additional study forceps, except in extreme cases, and the surgeon can perform the procedure without an assistant to hold the laparoscope.



Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 18. Juli 2021

Angenommen: 17. Januar 2022

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
03. Februar 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany