Cysto-Vaginoscopy of a 3D-Printed Cloaca Model: A Step toward Personalized Noninvasive Preoperative Assessment in Patients with Complex Anorectal Malformations

Abstract

Introduction For the classification of the complexity of cloacal malformations and the decision on the operative approach, an exact anatomical assessment is mandatory. To benefit from using three-dimensional (3D)-printed models in preoperative planning and training, the practicability of these models should be guaranteed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality and feasibility of a real-size 3D-printed cloaca model for the purpose of cysto-vaginoscopic evaluation.

Materials and Methods We performed a 3D reconstruction and printed a real-size, rubber-like 3D model of an infant pelvis with a cloacal malformation and asked invited pediatric surgeons and pediatric urologists to perform a cysto-vaginoscopy on the model and to complete a brief questionnaire to rate the quality and feasibility of the model and to indicate whether they would recommend the model for preoperative planning and training.

Results Overall, 41 participants rated the model quality as good to very good (M = 3.28, standard deviation [SD] = 0.50, on a scale from 1 to 4). The model was rated as feasible for preoperative training (M = 4.10, SD = 0.75, on a scale from 1 to 5) and most participants (85.4%) would recommend the model for preoperative training. The cysto-vaginoscopy of the model was considered as a valid training tool for real-life cases and improved the confidence on the anatomy of a cloaca.

Conclusion The results of our study indicate that patient-specific 3D-printed models might be a useful tool in the preoperative evaluation of complex anorectal malformations by simulation of cysto-vaginoscopy with an excellent view on anatomical structures to assess the whole spectrum of the individual cloacal malformation. Our model might be a valuable add-on tool for specialty training in pediatric colorectal surgery.

Keywords

cloaca - anorectal malformation - 3D printing - surgical simulation - preoperative training

Publication History

Received: 19 October 2020

Accepted: 16 February 2021

Article published online:
23 March 2021

• References

• 1 Warne SA, Hiorns MP, Curry J, Mushtaq I. Understanding cloacal anomalies. Arch Dis Child 2011; 96 (11) 1072-1076
• 2 Hendren WH. Cloaca, the most severe degree of imperforate anus: experience with 195 cases. Ann Surg 1998; 228 (03) 331-346
• 3 Levitt MA, Peña A. Cloacal malformations: lessons learned from 490 cases. Semin Pediatr Surg 2010; 19 (02) 128-138
• 4 Bati AH, Guler E, Ozer MA. et al. Surgical planning with patient-specific three-dimensional printed pancreaticobiliary disease models - Cross-sectional study. Int J Surg 2020; 80: 175-183
• 5 Ong J. 3D printing for the planning and use in complicated surgical procedures: an interview with Juling Ong. J Print Med 2019; 3: 157-159
• 6 Ahn JJ, Shnorhavorian M, Amies Oelschlager AE. et al. Use of 3D reconstruction cloacagrams and 3D printing in cloacal malformations. J Pediatr Urol 2017; 13 (04) 395.e1-395.e6
• 7 Reck-Burneo CA, Lane V, Bates DG. et al. The use of rotational fluoroscopy and 3-D reconstruction in the diagnosis and surgical planning for complex cloacal malformations. J Pediatr Surg 2019; 54 (08) 1590-1594
• 8 Jarboe MD, Teitelbaum DH, Dillman JR. Combined 3D rotational fluoroscopic-MRI cloacagram procedure defines luminal and extraluminal pelvic anatomy prior to surgical reconstruction of cloacal and other complex pelvic malformations. Pediatr Surg Int 2012; 28 (08) 757-763
• 9 Halleran DR, Smith CA, Fuller MK. et al; Pediatric Colorectal and Pelvic Learning Consortium. Measure twice and cut once: comparing endoscopy and 3D cloacagram for the common channel and urethral measurements in patients with cloacal malformations. J Pediatr Surg 2020; 55 (02) 257-260
• 10 Wagner M, Heimberg E, Mileder LP, Staffler A, Paulun A, Löllgen RM. German-speaking Research Association for Simulation in Pediatrics (GRASP). Status quo in pediatric and neonatal simulation in four central european regions: The DACHS Survey. Simul Healthc 2018; 13 (04) 247-252
• 11 Wagner M, Hauser K, Cardona F. et al. Implementation and evaluation of training for ultrasound-guided vascular access to small vessels using a low-cost cadaver model. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2018; 19 (11) e611-e617
• 12 How to choose the right 3D printing material: understanding material properties of plastics. Accessed July 16, 2020 at: https://archive-media.formlabs.com/upload/how-to-choose-the-right-3D-printing-material.pdf
• 13 Damon A, Clifton W, Valero-Moreno F, Nottmeier E. Orientation planning in the fused deposition modeling 3D printing of anatomical spine models. Cureus 2020; 12 (02) e7081
• 14 Clifton W, Damon A, Nottmeier E, Pichelmann M. Establishing a cost-effective 3-dimensional printing laboratory for anatomical modeling and simulation: an institutional experience. Simul Healthc 2020; DOI: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000476.
• 15 Damon A, Clifton W, Valero-Moreno F, Quinones-Hinojosa A. Cost-effective method for 3-dimensional printing dynamic multiobject and patient-specific brain tumor models: technical note. World Neurosurg 2020; 140: 173-179
• 16 Ospina JC, Fandiño A, Hernández S. et al. 3D-printed pediatric temporal bone models for surgical training: a patient-specific and low-cost alternative. J Print Med 2019; 3: 135-143
• 17 Abdullah F, Salazar JH, Gause CD. et al. Understanding the operative experience of the practicing pediatric surgeon: implications for training and maintaining competency. JAMA Surg 2016; 151 (08) 735-741