Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2022; 70(01): 077-082
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1723847
Original Thoracic

Application of Polydioxanone Sutures in the Nuss Procedure

Yimin Xie
1   Department of Pediatric Surgery, Chongqing University Three Gorges Hospital, Chongqing, China
,
Jinbo Ning 
2   Department of Pediatric Surgery, Chongqing University Three Gorges Hospital, Chongqing, China
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
   Permissions and Reprints All articles of this category

Abstract

Background/Purpose The Nuss procedure is the most common surgical repair for pectus excavatum (PE). Surgical steel wires are used in some modifications of the Nuss procedure to attach one or both ends of a support bar to the ribs. During follow-up, wire breakage was found in some cases. Patients with wire breakage may undergo prolonged bar removal surgery and may be exposed to excessive radiation.

In this study, we had a series of patients who received polydioxanone suture (PDS) fixations instead of steel wires. This retrospective study was conducted to explore the differences between these two fixation materials in the incidence of related complications and efficacies. Furthermore, we attempted to observe whether the two materials lead to similar surgical efficacy in the Nuss procedure, whether they have divergent effects on the bar removal surgery, and whether PDS can reduce the risks due to steel wire breakage as expected.

Methods We retrospectively studied PDS and surgical steel wires as fixation materials for the Nuss procedure in children with congenital PE and reviewed the outcomes and complications. A total of 75 children who had undergone Nuss procedure repairs and bar removals from January 2013 to December 2019 were recruited to participate in this study. They were divided into three groups: the PDS group, the unbroken wire (UBW) group, and the broken wire (BW) group, according to the fixation materials and whether the wires had broken or not. Moreover, we selected the duration of operation (DO), intraoperative blood loss (BL), bar displacement (BD), postoperative pain score (PPS), and incision infection as the risk indicators and the postrepair Haller index (HI) as the effectiveness indicator. These indicators were statistically compared to determine whether there were differences among the three groups.

Results One BD occurred in the PDS and BW groups while none took place in the UBW group. No incision infection was found in any of the groups. The PDS group had the shortest DO, while the DO in the UBW group was shorter than that in the BW group (p < 0.05). BL in the PDS group was less than that in the other two groups (p < 0.05). Additionally, no difference was observed in BL between the BW and UBW groups (p > 0.05). The PPS of the PDS group was less than that of the BW group (p < 0.05), whereas no differences were found between the other two groups. No statistical difference emerged in HI among the groups (p > 0.05).

Conclusion PDS fixation results in a similar repair outcome and shows certain advantages in the DO, BL, and PPS; also, PDSs are safe and effective in the Nuss procedure.

Level of evidence Level III.

Keywords

pectus excavatum - Nuss procedure - minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum (MIRPE) - polydioxanone suture


Publication History

Received: 28 August 2020

Accepted: 30 December 2020

Article published online:
18 February 2021

© 2021. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 Nuss D, Kelly Jr RE, Croitoru DP, Katz ME. A 10-year review of a minimally invasive technique for the correction of pectus excavatum. J Pediatr Surg 1998; 33 (04) 545-552
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Bodenstein L, Notrica DM. Use of a capture-guidance surgical instrument to minimize muscle stripping during Nuss repair of pectus excavatum. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2019; 29 (06) 865-868
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 de Campos JR, Das-Neves-Pereira JC, Lopes KM, Jatene FB. Technical modifications in stabilisers and in bar removal in the Nuss procedure. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2009; 36 (02) 410-412
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Li G, Jiang Z, Xiao H. et al. A novel modified Nuss procedure for pectus excavatum: a new steel bar. Ann Thorac Surg 2015; 99 (05) 1788-1792
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Wong DL, Baker CM. Pain in children: comparison of assessment scales. Pediatr Nurs 1988; 14 (01) 9-17
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Khanna G, Jaju A, Don S, Keys T, Hildebolt CF. Comparison of Haller index values calculated with chest radiographs versus CT for pectus excavatum evaluation. Pediatr Radiol 2010; 40 (11) 1763-1767
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Hebra A, Calder BW, Lesher A. Minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum. J Vis Surg 2016; 2: 73
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Kanagaratnam A, Phan S, Tchantchaleishvili V, Phan K. Ravitch versus Nuss procedure for pectus excavatum: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2016; 5 (05) 409-421
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Nuss D, Croitoru DP, Kelly Jr RE, Goretsky MJ, Nuss KJ, Gustin TS. Review and discussion of the complications of minimally invasive pectus excavatum repair. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2002; 12 (04) 230-234
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Park HJ, Lee SY, Lee CS. Complications associated with the Nuss procedure: analysis of risk factors and suggested measures for prevention of complications. J Pediatr Surg 2004; 39 (03) 391-395 , discussion 391–395
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Hebra A, Gauderer MW, Tagge EP, Adamson WT, Othersen Jr HB. A simple technique for preventing bar displacement with the Nuss repair of pectus excavatum. J Pediatr Surg 2001; 36 (08) 1266-1268
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Castellani C, Schalamon J, Saxena AK, Höellwarth ME. Early complications of the Nuss procedure for pectus excavatum: a prospective study. Pediatr Surg Int 2008; 24 (06) 659-666
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Yoon YS, Kim HK, Choi YS, Kim K, Shim YM, Kim J. A modified Nuss procedure for late adolescent and adult pectus excavatum. World J Surg 2010; 34 (07) 1475-1480
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Boland ED, Coleman BD, Barnes CP, Simpson DG, Wnek GE, Bowlin GL. Electrospinning polydioxanone for biomedical applications. Acta Biomater 2005; 1 (01) 115-123
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Bigdelian H, Sedighi M. Evaluation of sternal closure with absorbable polydioxanone sutures in children. J Cardiovasc Thorac Res 2014; 6 (01) 57-59
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Gupta D, Sharma U, Chauhan S, Sahu SA. Improved outcomes of scar revision with the use of polydioxanone suture in comparison to polyglactin 910: a randomized controlled trial. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2018; 71 (08) 1159-1163
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Jordan MC, Boelch S, Jansen H, Meffert RH, Hoelscher-Doht S. Does plastic suture deformation induce gapping after tendon repair? A biomechanical comparison of different suture materials. J Biomech 2016; 49 (13) 2607-2612
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Naz S, Memon SA, Jamali MA. et al. Polydioxanone versus polypropylene closure for midline abdominal incisions. JAMC 2017; 29 (04) 591-594
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Müller DA, Snedeker JG, Meyer DC. Two-month longitudinal study of mechanical properties of absorbable sutures used in orthopedic surgery. J Orthop Surg Res 2016; 11 (01) 111
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Liber-Kneć A, Łagan S. The stress relaxation process in sutures tied with a surgeon's knot in a simulated biological environment. Polim Med 2016; 46 (02) 111-116
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Gierek M, Kuśnierz K, Lampe P. et al. Absorbable sutures in general surgery - review, available materials, and optimum choices. Pol Przegl Chir 2018; 90 (02) 34-37
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Del Frari B, Schwabegger AH. How to avoid pectus bar dislocation in the MIRPE or MOVARPE technique: results of 12 years' experience. Ann Plast Surg 2014; 72 (01) 75-79
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar