Nickel-Catalyzed Favorskii-Type Rearrangement of Cyclobutanone Oxime Esters to Cyclopropanecarbonitriles

Abstract

A nickel-catalyzed base-promoted rearrangement of cyclo­butanone oxime esters to cyclopropanecarbonitriles was developed. The ring opening of cyclobutanone oxime esters occurs at the sterically less hindered side. A base-promoted nickelacyclobutane intermediate, formed in situ, is assumed to be involved in the formation of the product.

Key words

nickel catalysis - cyclobutanone oxime esters - cyclopropanecarbonitriles - ring opening - Favorskii rearrangement

Publication History

Received: 14 January 2020

Accepted: 09 March 2020

Article published online:
30 March 2020

• References and Notes

• 1a Kim D.-S, Park W.-J, Jun C.-H. Chem. Rev. 2017; 117: 8977
• 1b Souillart L, Cramer N. Chem. Rev. 2015; 115: 9410
• 1c Dermenci A, Coe JW, Dong G. Org. Chem. Front. 2014; 1: 567
• 1d Aïssa C. Synthesis 2011; 3389
• 2 Rubin M, Rubina M, Gevorgyan V. Chem. Rev. 2007; 107: 3117
• 3a Boivin J, Schiano A.-M, Zard SZ. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992; 33: 7849
• 3b Boivin J, Fouquet E, Zard SZ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991; 113: 1055

For selected reviews on cycloketone oximes, see:
• 4a Morcillo SP. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019; 58: 14044
• 4b Stateman LM, Nakafuku KM, Nagib DA. Synthesis 2018; 50: 1569
• 4c Davies J, Morcillo SP, Douglas JJ, Leonori D. Chem. Eur. J. 2018; 24: 12154
• 4d Zhao J, Duan X, Guo L.-N. Chin. J. Org. Chem 2017; 37: 2498
• 4e Zard SZ. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008; 37: 1603

For selected examples on ring cleavage of cyclobutanone oximes via photocatalysis, see:
• 5a Lu B, Cheng Y, Chen L.-Y, Xiao W.-J. ACS Catal. 2019; 9: 8159
• 5b He Y, Anand D, Sun Z, Zhou L. Org. Lett. 2019; 21: 3769
• 5c Xia P.-J, Ye Z.-P, Hu Y.-Z, Song D, Xiang H.-Y, Chen X.-Q, Yang H. Org. Lett. 2019; 21: 2658
• 5d Zhao B, Chen C, Lv J, Shi Z. Org. Chem. Front. 2018; 5: 2719
• 5e Davies J, Sheikh NS, Leonori D. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017; 56: 13361

For selected examples on ring cleavage of cyclobutanone oximes via metal catalysis, see:
• 6a Tang Y.-Q, Yang J.-C, Wang L, Guo L.-N. Org. Lett. 2019; 21: 5178
• 6b Yang L, Zhang J.-Y, Duan X.-H, Gao P, Jiao J, Guo L.-N. J. Org. Chem. 2019; 84: 8615
• 6c Ding D, Lan Y, Lin Z, Wang C. Org. Lett. 2019; 21: 2723
• 6d Liu Z, Shen H, Xiao H, Wang Z, Zhu L, Li C. Org. Lett. 2019; 21: 5201
• 6e Ai W, Liu Y, Wang Q, Liu Q. Org. Lett. 2018; 20: 409
• 6f Gu Y.-R, Duan X.-H, Yang L, Guo L.-N. Org. Lett. 2017; 19: 5908
• 6g Nishimura T, Yoshinaka T, Nishiguchi Y, Maeda Y, Uemura S. Org. Lett. 2005; 7: 2425
• 7 Nishimura T, Uemura S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000; 122: 12049
• 8a Cao J, Chen L, Sun F.-N, Sun Y.-L, Jiang K.-Z, Yang K.-F, Xu Z, Xu L.-W. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019; 58: 897
• 8b Zhang Z.-Z, Han Y.-Q, Zhan B.-B, Wang S, Shi B.-F. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017; 56: 13145
• 9 Murakami M, Amii H, Ito Y. Nature 1994; 370: 540
• 10 Shuai B, Li Z.-M, Qiu H, Fang P, Mei T.-S. Chin. J. Org. Chem 2019; DOI: 10.6023/cjoc201911016.
• 11a Künzi SA, Gershoni-Poranne R, Chen P. Organometallics 2019; 38: 1928
• 11b Werth J, Uyeda C. Chem. Sci. 2018; 9: 1604
• 11c Farley CM, Zhou Y.-Y, Banka N, Uyeda C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018; 140: 12710
• 11d Pal S, Zhou Y.-Y, Uyeda C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017; 139: 11686
• 11e Zhou Y.-Y, Uyeda C. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016; 55: 3171
• 11f Xu J, Samsuri NB, Duong HA. Chem. Commun. 2016; 52: 3372
• 11g Künzi SA, Sarria Toro JM, den Hartog T, Chen P. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015; 54: 10670
• 11h Toro JM. S, den Hartog T, Chen P. Chem. Commun. 2014; 50: 10608
• 12 Erickson LW, Lucas EL, Tollefson EJ, Jarvo ER. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016; 138: 14006
• 13a Yang X, Fleming FF. Acc. Chem. Res. 2017; 50: 2556
• 13b Purzycki M, Liu W, Hilmersson G, Fleming FF. Chem. Commun. 2013; 49: 4700
• 13c Fleming FF, Zhang Z, Liu W, Knochel P. J. Org. Chem. 2005; 70: 2200
• 14 Cyclopropanecarbonitriles 2; General Procedure In a glove box, a 4 mL screw-capped vial was charged with the appropriate oxime ester 1 (0.2 mmol), NiCl₂(glyme) (4 mg, 0.02 mmol), dtbbpy (5 mg, 0.02 mmol), and DMF (0.2 mL). The mixture was then stirred for 15 min at rt, and a 1.0 M solution of LiHMDS in THF (0.4 mL, 0.4 mmol) was added. The vial was removed from the glove box, and the mixture was stirred at rt for 12 h. The reaction was then quenched with 1 N sat. aq NH₄Cl and diluted with EtOAc. The organic layer was separated, dried (Na₂SO₄), filtered, and concentrated under a vacuum. The product was then obtained by flash chromatography. 1-(4-sec-Butylphenyl)cyclopropanecarbonitrile (2d) Yellow oil; yield: 35.85 mg (90%). ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 7.19 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2 H), 7.12 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 2 H), 2.45 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 2 H), 1.84 (dt, J = 13.5, 6.7 Hz, 1 H), 1.72–1.66 (m, 2 H), 1.41–1.34 (m, 2 H), 0.89 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 6 H). ¹³C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 141.29, 133.20, 129.59, 125.59, 122.82, 44.87, 30.17, 22.29, 17.93, 13.50. HRMS (EI): m/z [M]⁺ calcd for C₁₄H₁₇N: 199.1356; found: 199.1355. 1-(Phenylselanyl)cyclopropanecarbonitrile (2l) Yellow oil; yield: 39.69 mg (89%). ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 7.70–7.61 (m, 2 H), 7.38 (dd, J = 5.0, 1.9 Hz, 3 H), 1.74–1.67 (m, 2 H), 1.41–1.35 (m, 2 H). ¹³C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 133.74, 129.58, 128.82, 128.27, 122.70, 18.31, 2.62. HRMS (EI): m/z [M]⁺ calcd for C₁₀H₉N⁸⁰Se: 222.9895; found: 222.9894.