J Knee Surg 2019; 32(06): 544-549
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1655742
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Quality and Variability of Online Physical Therapy Protocols for Isolated Meniscal Repairs

David P. Trofa
1   Department of Orthopaedics, New York–Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
Robert L. Parisien
2   Department of Orthopaedics, Boston University Medical Center, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts
Manish S. Noticewala
1   Department of Orthopaedics, New York–Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
Peter C. Noback
1   Department of Orthopaedics, New York–Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
Christopher S. Ahmad
1   Department of Orthopaedics, New York–Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
Vasilios Moutzouros
3   Department of Orthopaedics, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan
Eric C. Makhni
3   Department of Orthopaedics, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

24 November 2017

21 April 2018

Publication Date:
31 May 2018 (online)


The ideal meniscal repair postoperative rehabilitation protocol has yet to be determined. Further, patients are attempting to access health care content online at a precipitously increasing rate given the efficiency of modern search engines. The purpose of this investigation was to assess the quality and variability of meniscal repair rehabilitation protocols published online with the hypothesis that there would be a high degree of variability found across available protocols. To this end, Web-based meniscal repair physical therapy protocols from U.S. academic orthopaedic programs as well as the first 10 protocols identified by the Google search engine for the term “meniscal repair physical therapy protocol” were reviewed and assessed via a custom scoring rubric. Twenty protocols were identified from 155 U.S. academic orthopaedic programs for a total of 30 protocols. Twenty-six protocols (86.6%) recommended immediate postoperative bracing. Twelve (40.0%) protocols permitted immediate weight-bearing as tolerated (WBAT) postoperatively, while the remaining protocols permitted WBAT at an average of 4.0 (range, 1–7) weeks. There was considerable variation in range of motion (ROM) goals, with most protocols (73.3%) initiating immediate passive ROM to 90°. The types and timing of strength, proprioception, agility, and pivoting exercises advised were extremely diverse. Only five protocols (16.7%) employed functional testing as a marker for return to athletics. The results of this study indicate that only a minority of academic orthopaedic programs publish meniscal repair physical therapy protocols online and that within the most readily available online protocols there are significant disparities in regards to brace use, ROM, weight-bearing, and strengthening and proprioception exercises. These discrepancies reflect the fact that the best rehabilitation practices after a meniscal repair have yet to be elucidated. This represents a significant area for improved patient care through standardization.

  • References

  • 1 Frizziero A, Ferrari R, Giannotti E, Ferroni C, Poli P, Masiero S. The meniscus tear. State of the art of rehabilitation protocols related to surgical procedures. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J 2013; 2 (04) 295-301
  • 2 Mueller BT, Moulton SG, O'Brien L, LaPrade RF. Rehabilitation following meniscal root repair: a clinical commentary. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2016; 46 (02) 104-113
  • 3 Cavanaugh JT, Killian SE. Rehabilitation following meniscal repair. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2012; 5 (01) 46-58
  • 4 Makhni EC, Crump EK, Steinhaus ME. , et al. Quality and variability of online available physical therapy protocols from academic orthopaedic surgery programs for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 2016; 32 (08) 1612-1621
  • 5 Bozic KJ. Value-based healthcare and orthopaedic surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012; 470 (04) 1004-1005
  • 6 Porter ME. A strategy for health care reform--toward a value-based system. N Engl J Med 2009; 361 (02) 109-112
  • 7 Hando BR, Gill NW, Walker MJ, Garber M. Short- and long-term clinical outcomes following a standardized protocol of orthopedic manual physical therapy and exercise in individuals with osteoarthritis of the hip: a case series. J Manual Manip Ther 2012; 20 (04) 192-200
  • 8 Barber FA. Accelerated rehabilitation for meniscus repairs. Arthroscopy 1994; 10 (02) 206-210
  • 9 Shelbourne KD, Patel DV, Adsit WS, Porter DA. Rehabilitation after meniscal repair. Clin Sports Med 1996; 15 (03) 595-612
  • 10 Vascellari A, Rebuzzi E, Schiavetti S, Coletti N. All-inside meniscal repair using the FasT-Fix meniscal repair system: is still needed to avoid weight bearing? A systematic review. Musculoskelet Surg 2012; 96 (03) 149-154
  • 11 VanderHave KL, Perkins C, Le M. Weightbearing versus nonweightbearing after meniscus repair. Sports Health 2015; 7 (05) 399-402
  • 12 Kozlowski EJ, Barcia AM, Tokish JM. Meniscus repair: the role of accelerated rehabilitation in return to sport. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev 2012; 20 (02) 121-126
  • 13 Mariani PP, Santori N, Adriani E, Mastantuono M. Accelerated rehabilitation after arthroscopic meniscal repair: a clinical and magnetic resonance imaging evaluation. Arthroscopy 1996; 12 (06) 680-686
  • 14 Becker R, Wirz D, Wolf C, Göpfert B, Nebelung W, Friederich N. Measurement of meniscofemoral contact pressure after repair of bucket-handle tears with biodegradable implants. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2005; 125 (04) 254-260
  • 15 Dowdy PA, Miniaci A, Arnoczky SP, Fowler PJ, Boughner DR. The effect of cast immobilization on meniscal healing. An experimental study in the dog. Am J Sports Med 1995; 23 (06) 721-728
  • 16 Laible C, Stein DA, Kiridly DN. Meniscal repair. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2013; 21 (04) 204-213
  • 17 Noyes FR, Heckmann TP, Barber-Westin SD. Meniscus repair and transplantation: a comprehensive update. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2012; 42 (03) 274-290
  • 18 Grant JA, Mohtadi NGH, Maitland ME, Zernicke RF. Comparison of home versus physical therapy-supervised rehabilitation programs after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Sports Med 2005; 33 (09) 1288-1297
  • 19 Wright RW, Preston E, Fleming BC. , et al. A systematic review of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction rehabilitation: part I: continuous passive motion, early weight bearing, postoperative bracing, and home-based rehabilitation. J Knee Surg 2008; 21 (03) 217-224