Synlett 2019; 30(03): 293-298
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1611706
letter
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Molecular-Iodine-Promoted Synthesis of Dihydrobenzofuran-3,3-dicarbonitriles through a Novel Rearrangement

Nagaraju Medishetti
a   Fluoro & Agro Chemicals Division, CSIR-Indian Institute of Chemical Technology, Tarnaka, Hyderabad 500 007, India
c   AcSIR-Indian Institute of Chemical Technology, Tarnaka, Hyderabad 500 007, India   Email: krishnu@iict.res.in
,
Ashok Kale
a   Fluoro & Agro Chemicals Division, CSIR-Indian Institute of Chemical Technology, Tarnaka, Hyderabad 500 007, India
c   AcSIR-Indian Institute of Chemical Technology, Tarnaka, Hyderabad 500 007, India   Email: krishnu@iict.res.in
,
Jagadeesh Babu Nanubolu
b   Laboratory of X-ray Crystallography, CSIR-Indian Institute of Chemical Technology, Tarnaka, Hyderabad 500 007, India
,
a   Fluoro & Agro Chemicals Division, CSIR-Indian Institute of Chemical Technology, Tarnaka, Hyderabad 500 007, India
c   AcSIR-Indian Institute of Chemical Technology, Tarnaka, Hyderabad 500 007, India   Email: krishnu@iict.res.in
› Author Affiliations
We are grateful to SERB-DST, New Delhi, for financial support (Grant no. EEQ/20l6/000066). We gratefully acknowledge the help received from the Centre for NMR & Structural Chemistry and Analytical Chemistry & Mass Spectrometry, CSIR –IICT.
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 01 November 2018

Accepted after revision: 16 December 2018

Publication Date:
11 January 2019 (online)


CSIR-IICT Communication No. IICT/pubs./2018/203.

Abstract

The title compounds were synthesized from 5,5-dimethyl­cyclohexane-1,3-dione, benzaldehyde, and malononitrile promoted by molecular iodine in basic medium via 2-amino-7,7-dimethyl-5-oxo-4-phenyl-5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-4H-chromene-3-carbonitrile, by a novel protocol. The protocol involves a novel rearrangement in which the 4H-chromene fragment dissociates to a cyclopropane moiety and rearranges to the five-membered compound 6,6-dimethyl-4-oxo-2-phenyl-4,5,6,7-tetrahydrobenzofuran-3,3(2H)-dicarbonitrile. Simple reaction conditions, excellent yields, and high compatibility are the advantages of this protocol.

Supporting Information

 
  • References and Notes

    • 1a Lipshutz BH. Chem. Rev. 1986; 86: 795
    • 1b McCallion GD. Curr. Org. Chem. 1999; 3: 67
    • 1c Goel A, Kumar A, Raghuvanshi A. Chem. Rev. 2013; 113: 1614
    • 1d Mortensen DS, Rodriguez AL, Carlson KE, Sun J, Katzenellenbogen BS, Katzenellenbogen JA. J. Med. Chem. 2001; 44: 3838
    • 2a Lee J, Li J.-H, Oya S, Snyder JK. J. Org. Chem. 1992; 57: 5301
    • 2b Kubo I, Lee YW, Balogh-Nair V, Nakanishi K, Chapya A. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1976; 949
    • 2c Schulte G, Scheuer PJ, McConnell OJ. Helv. Chim. Acta 1980; 63: 2159
    • 3a Shen TY, Hwang SB, Chang MN, Doebber TW, Lam MH, Wu MS, Wang X, Han GQ, Li RZ. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1985; 82: 672
    • 3b Ponpipom MM, Yue BZ, Bugianesi RL, Brooker DR, Chang MN, Shen TY. Tetrahedron Lett. 1986; 27: 309
    • 4a Ward RS. Nat. Prod. Rep. 1993; 10: 1
    • 4b Gottlieb OR, Yoshida M. In Natural Products of Woody Plants: Chemicals Extraneous to the Lignocellulosic Cell Wall . Rowe JW. Springer; Berlin: 1989
    • 4c Ward RS. Chem. Soc. Rev. 1982; 11: 75
    • 4d Ward RS. Tetrahedron 1990; 46: 5029
    • 5a Jurd L, Manners G, Stevens K. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1972; 992
    • 5b Jurd L, Stevens K, Manners G. Tetrahedron 1973; 29: 2347
    • 5c Gregson M, Ollis WD, Redman BT, Sutherland IO, Dietrich HH, Gottlieb OR. Phytochemistry 1978; 17: 1395
    • 6a Iida T, Ito K. Phytochemistry 1983; 22: 763
    • 6b Wang S, Gates BD, Swenton JS. J. Org. Chem. 1991; 56: 1979
  • 7 Hayashi T, Thomson RH. Phytochemistry 1975; 14: 1085
  • 8 Chauret DC, Bernard CB, Arnason JT, Durst T, Krishnamurty HG, Sanchez-Vindas P, Moreno N, Roman LS, Poveda L. J. Nat. Prod. 1996; 59: 152
  • 9 De Campos MP, Cechinel V, Filho Da Silva RZ, Yunes RA, Zacchino S, Juarez S, Cé Bella Cruz RC, Bella Cruz A. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2005; 28: 1527
  • 10 Luize PS, Ueda-Nakamura T, Prado Dias B, Filho Garcia-Cortez DA, Nakamura CV. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2006; 29: 2126
    • 11a MacRae WD, Towers GH. N. Phytochemistry 1984; 23: 1207
    • 11b Ward RS. Nat. Prod. Rep. 1995; 183
  • 12 Apers S, Paper D, Bürgermeister J, Baronikova S, Van Dyck S, Lemiere G, Vlietinck A, Pieters L. J. Nat. Prod. 2002; 65: 718
  • 13 Coy ED, Cuca LE, Sefkow M. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2009; 19: 6922
    • 14a For leading references to the asymmetric synthesis of tetrahydrofurans, see: Hou X.-L, Yang Z, Yeung K.-S, Wong HN. C. Prog. Heterocycl. Chem. 2005; 17: 142
    • 14b Elliott MC. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2002; 1: 2301
    • 14c Faul MM, Huff BE. Chem. Rev. 2000; 100: 2407
  • 15 Rueping M, Parra A, Uria U, Besselièvre F, Merino E. Org. Lett. 2010; 12: 5680
    • 16a Feist F. Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 1902; 35: 1537
    • 16b Benary E. Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 1911; 44: 489
    • 16c Calter MA, Zhu C. Org. Lett. 2002; 4: 205
  • 17 Vinosha B, Perumal S, Renuga S, Almansour AI. Tetrahedron Lett. 2012; 53: 962
  • 19 Chuang C.-P, Tsai A.-I. Synthesis 2006; 675
  • 20 Lee YR, Kim BS, Kim DH. Tetrahedron 2000; 56: 8845
  • 21 Schmidt B. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2003; 816
  • 22 Yoshida J, Yano S, Ozawa T, Kawabata N. J. Org. Chem. 1985; 50: 3467
  • 23 Ranu BC, Adak L, Banerjee S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008; 49: 4613
  • 24 Son S, Fu GC. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007; 129: 1046
  • 25 Ma S, Zheng Z, Jiang X. Org. Lett. 2007; 9: 529
    • 26a Chennapuram M, Emmadi NR, Bingi C, Nanubolu JB, Atmakur K. Green Chem. 2014; 16: 3237
    • 26b Bingi C, Emmadi NR, Chennapuram M, Nanubolu JB, Atmakur K. RSC Adv. 2014; 4: 35009
    • 26c Bingia C, Emmadi NR, Chennapuram M, Poornachandra Y, Kumar CG, Babu J, Naanubolu JB, Atmakur K. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2015; 25: 1915
    • 26d Kale A, Chennapuram M, Bingi C, Nanubolu JB, Atmakur K. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2016; 14: 582
    • 26e Ashok K, Chiranjeevi B, Sarada S, Ganesh Kumar C, Atmakur K. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2016; 26: 4899
    • 26f Kale A, Medishetti N, Bingi C, Atmakur K. Synlett 2018; 29: 1037
    • 26g Kale A, Medishetti N, Nanubolu JB, Atmakur K. Tetrahedron Lett. 2018; 59: 4168
    • 27a Mukherjee P, Das AR. J. Org. Chem. 2017; 82: 2794
    • 27b Mukherjee P, Das AR. RSC Adv. 2016; 6: 132
  • 28 CCDC 1824517 contains the supplementary crystallographic data for compound 2c. The data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/getstructures.
  • 29 2-(Het)aryl-6,6-Dimethyl-4-oxo-2-phenyl-4,5,6,7-tetrahydro­benzofuran-3,3(2H)-dicarbonitriles (2a–r); General Procedure A round-bottomed flask equipped with a reflux condenser and stopper was charged with the appropriate nitrile 1 (1.02 mmol), I2 (1.02 mmol), Et3N (2.04 mmol), and DCE (20 mL), and the mixture was refluxed with stirring for 2 h. When the reaction was complete (TLC), the homogeneous reaction mass was concentrated under reduced pressure and the residue was transferred to a separatory funnel, washed with H2O (3 × 20 mL), and extracted with EtOAc (20 mL). The organic layer was dried (­Na2SO4) and concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by column chromatography (silica gel, 20–40% EtOAc–hexane). 6,6-Dimethyl-4-oxo-2-phenyl-4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-1-benzo­furan-3,3(2H)-dicarbonitrile (2a) Colorless solid; yield: 0.232 g (80%); mp 142–144°C. IR (KBr): 2952, 2238, 1655, 1412, 1120, 1059, 985, 850, 776 cm–1. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.55–7.46 (m, 3 H), 7.45–7.41 (m, 2 H), 6.14 (s, 1 H), 2.64–2.50 (m, 2 H), 2.46–2.31 (m, 2 H), 1.19–1.15 (s, 6 H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 190.4, 179.2, 131.4, 130.9, 129.3, 125.9, 112.8, 110.2, 108.2, 92.4, 50.4, 42.5, 37.8, 34.3, 28.8, 27.9. ESI-MS: m/z = 293 [M + H]+. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C18H17N2O2: 293.1300; found: 293.1284.