Eur J Pediatr Surg 2018; 28(03): 238-242
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1603090
Review Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Laparoscopic Pyloromyotomy: A Study of the Learning Curve

Aurélien Binet
1   Pediatric Radiology Unit, Centre Hospitalier Regional Universitaire de Tours, Tours, France
,
François Bastard
1   Pediatric Radiology Unit, Centre Hospitalier Regional Universitaire de Tours, Tours, France
,
Pierre Meignan
1   Pediatric Radiology Unit, Centre Hospitalier Regional Universitaire de Tours, Tours, France
,
Karim Braïk
1   Pediatric Radiology Unit, Centre Hospitalier Regional Universitaire de Tours, Tours, France
,
Anne Le Touze
1   Pediatric Radiology Unit, Centre Hospitalier Regional Universitaire de Tours, Tours, France
,
Thierry Villemagne
1   Pediatric Radiology Unit, Centre Hospitalier Regional Universitaire de Tours, Tours, France
,
Baptiste Morel
1   Pediatric Radiology Unit, Centre Hospitalier Regional Universitaire de Tours, Tours, France
,
Michel Robert
1   Pediatric Radiology Unit, Centre Hospitalier Regional Universitaire de Tours, Tours, France
,
Clémence Klipfel
1   Pediatric Radiology Unit, Centre Hospitalier Regional Universitaire de Tours, Tours, France
,
Hubert Lardy
1   Pediatric Radiology Unit, Centre Hospitalier Regional Universitaire de Tours, Tours, France
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

17 January 2017

04 April 2017

Publication Date:
15 May 2017 (online)

Abstract

Introduction Laparoscopic pyloromyotomy (LPM) is a minimally invasive surgical technique used in pyloric stenosis treatment. This technique is safe, effective, and does not show more complications than laparotomy. Nevertheless, this technique requires an acquisition period to be optimally applied. This study analyses the learning curve of LPM.

Materials and Methods Seven surgeons were retrospectively evaluated on their 40 first LPM. Patient data were recorded, including peroperative data (operation length and complications) and postoperative recoveries (renutrition, vomiting, and complications). The learning curves were evaluated and each variable was compared with the different moments of the learning curve.

Results The mean operative time is 25 ± 11 minutes. It significantly decreases with the learning curve (p < 0.01). Ten procedures were necessary to acquire the operative technics. However, postoperative complications with a necessary redo procedure appear after the 10th patient. There is no significant difference concerning long-term postoperative complications according to the learning curve and to surgeons. The best results are recorded after the 20th patients. Hospital length of stay also decreases significantly after the 10th procedure. The recorded postoperative vomiting is independent to the operative time as the ad libitum feedings recovery.

Conclusion The learning curve of LPM is cut into three stages. Only 10 cases are needed to acquire the gesture. Complications appear after this acquirement period.

 
  • References

  • 1 Aspelund G, Langer JC. Current management of hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. Semin Pediatr Surg 2007; 16 (01) 27-33
  • 2 MacMahon B. The continuing enigma of pyloric stenosis of infancy: a review. Epidemiology 2006; 17 (02) 195-201
  • 3 Ranells JD, Carver JD, Kirby RS. Infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: epidemiology, genetics, and clinical update. Adv Pediatr 2011; 58 (01) 195-206
  • 4 Vermes G, Mátrai Á, Czeizel AE, Ács N. Birth outcomes of male and female patients with infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis--a population-based case-control study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2016; 29 (11) 1777-1782
  • 5 Selected birth defects data from population-based birth defects surveillance programs in the United States, 2003-2007. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 2010; 88 (12) 1062-1174
  • 6 Parker SE, Mai CT, Canfield MA. , et al; National Birth Defects Prevention Network. Updated National Birth Prevalence estimates for selected birth defects in the United States, 2004-2006. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 2010; 88 (12) 1008-1016
  • 7 van der Bilt JD, Kramer WL, van der Zee DC, Bax NM. Laparoscopic pyloromyotomy for hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: impact of experience on the results in 182 cases. Surg Endosc 2004; 18 (06) 907-909
  • 8 Robertson DE. Congenital pyloric stenosis. Ann Surg 1940; 112 (04) 687-699
  • 9 Tan KC, Bianchi A. Circumumbilical incision for pyloromyotomy. Br J Surg 1986; 73 (05) 399
  • 10 Alain JL, Grousseau D, Terrier G. Extramucosal pyloromyotomy by laparoscopy. Surg Endosc 1991; 5 (04) 174-175
  • 11 Carrington EV, Hall NJ, Pacilli M. , et al. Cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic versus open pyloromyotomy. J Surg Res 2012; 178 (01) 315-320
  • 12 Kuebler JF, Ure BM. Minimally invasive surgery in the neonate. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2011; 16 (03) 151-156
  • 13 Muensterer OJ, Chong AJ, Georgeson KE, Harmon CM. The cross-technique for single-incision pediatric endosurgical pyloromyotomy. Surg Endosc 2011; 25 (10) 3414-3418
  • 14 Adibe OO, Nichol PF, Flake AW, Mattei P. Comparison of outcomes after laparoscopic and open pyloromyotomy at a high-volume pediatric teaching hospital. J Pediatr Surg 2006; 41 (10) 1676-1678
  • 15 van der Bilt JD, Kramer WL, van der Zee DC, Bax NM. Early feeding after laparoscopic pyloromyotomy: the pros and cons. Surg Endosc 2004; 18 (05) 746-748
  • 16 Ford WD, Crameri JA, Holland AJ. The learning curve for laparoscopic pyloromyotomy. J Pediatr Surg 1997; 32 (04) 552-554
  • 17 Meehan JJ, Georgeson KE. The learning curve associated with laparoscopic antireflux surgery in infants and children. J Pediatr Surg 1997; 32 (03) 426-429
  • 18 Jiménez-Rodríguez RM, Díaz-Pavón JM, de la Portilla de Juan F, Prendes-Sillero E, Dussort HC, Padillo J. Learning curve for robotic-assisted laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis 2013; 28 (06) 815-821
  • 19 Zhou J, Shi Y, Qian F. , et al. Cumulative summation analysis of learning curve for robot-assisted gastrectomy in gastric cancer. J Surg Oncol 2015; 111 (06) 760-767
  • 20 Kim SS, Lau ST, Lee SL, Waldhausen JH. The learning curve associated with laparoscopic pyloromyotomy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2005; 15 (05) 474-477
  • 21 Oomen MW, Hoekstra LT, Bakx R, Heij HA. Learning curves for pediatric laparoscopy: how many operations are enough? The Amsterdam experience with laparoscopic pyloromyotomy. Surg Endosc 2010; 24 (08) 1829-1833
  • 22 Handu AT, Jadhav V, Deepak J. , et al. Laparoscopic pyloromyotomy: lessons learnt in our first 101 cases. J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg 2014; 19 (04) 213-217
  • 23 Hall NJ, Eaton S, Seims A. , et al. Risk of incomplete pyloromyotomy and mucosal perforation in open and laparoscopic pyloromyotomy. J Pediatr Surg 2014; 49 (07) 1083-1086
  • 24 Sitsen E, Bax NM, van der Zee DC. Is laparoscopic pyloromyotomy superior to open surgery?. Surg Endosc 1998; 12 (06) 813-815
  • 25 Alain JL, Grousseau D, Longis B, Ugazzi M, Terrier G. Extramucosal pyloromyotomy by laparoscopy. J Laparoendosc Surg 1996; 6 (Suppl. 01) S41-S44
  • 26 Greason KL, Thompson WR, Downey EC, Lo Sasso B. Laparoscopic pyloromyotomy for infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: report of 11 cases. J Pediatr Surg 1995; 30 (11) 1571-1574
  • 27 van Heurn LW, Vos P, Sie G. Recurrent vomiting after successful pyloromyotomy. Pediatr Surg Int 1999; 15 (5-6): 385-386
  • 28 Favre A, Huberlant S, Carbonnel M, Goetgheluck J, Revaux A, Ayoubi JM. Pedagogic approach in the surgical learning: the first period of “assistant surgeon” may improve the learning curve for laparoscopic robotic-assisted hysterectomy. Front Surg 2016; 3: 58