Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016; 64(07): 606-610
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1570375
Original Thoracic
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Development Pattern on Lymph Node Resection in Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy and 2-year Survival Analysis

Yunpeng Zhao
1   Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Second Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China
,
Xiaopeng Dong
1   Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Second Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China
,
Bo Cong
1   Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Second Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China
,
Chuanliang Peng
1   Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Second Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China
,
Qifeng Sun
1   Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Second Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China
,
Yingtao Hao
1   Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Second Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China
,
Xiaogang Zhao
1   Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Second Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

16 October 2015

16 November 2015

Publication Date:
14 January 2016 (online)

Abstract

Background Thoracoscopic-laparoscopic procedures have been used more in the operations of esophagus cancer; in most times we call it minimally invasive esophagectomy, which is becoming mature. However, the efficacy of minimally invasive esophagectomy is still unclear, especially about the dissection of lymph nodes and survival.

Methods A retrospective review was performed. The development process of minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer was divided into three stages: the first stage 20, the second stage 37, the third stage 50.

Result Total 107 patients underwent minimally invasive esophagectomy between July 2010 and May 2015. The number of lymph node resected during the three stages increased significantly, with a mean of 12.65, 15.91, and 20.16 nodes, respectively (p = 0.0075). The number of lymph nodes dissection greater than or equal to 12 or 18 increased significantly (p = 0.000). The patients from the first and the second stages had the similar 2-year survival rate (p = 0.8618). There is no significant difference in the 2-year disease-free survival rate (p = 0.606).

Conclusion Surgeons accumulate experience on lymphadenectomy during minimally invasive esophagectomy as time goes by, and experience on 50 to 60 cases is essential and necessary to accomplish an apparent progress.

 
  • References

  • 1 Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 2011; 61 (2) 69-90
  • 2 Parkin DM, Pisani P, Ferlay J. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 1999; 49 (1) 33-64, 1
  • 3 Isono K, Sato H, Nakayama K. Results of a nationwide study on the three-field lymph node dissection of esophageal cancer. Oncology 1991; 48 (5) 411-420
  • 4 Shiozaki H, Yano M, Tsujinaka T , et al. Lymph node metastasis along the recurrent nerve chain is an indication for cervical lymph node dissection in thoracic esophageal cancer. Dis Esophagus 2001; 14 (3–4) 191-196
  • 5 Jamieson GG, Lamb PJ, Thompson SK. The role of lymphadenectomy in esophageal cancer. Ann Surg 2009; 250 (2) 206-209
  • 6 Cuschieri A, Shimi S, Banting S. Endoscopic oesophagectomy through a right thoracoscopic approach. J R Coll Surg Edinb 1992; 37 (1) 7-11
  • 7 Gossot D, Cattan P, Fritsch S, Halimi B, Sarfati E, Celerier M. Can the morbidity of esophagectomy be reduced by the thoracoscopic approach?. Surg Endosc 1995; 9 (10) 1113-1115
  • 8 Liu HP, Chang CH, Lin PJ, Chang JP. Video-assisted endoscopic esophagectomy with stapled intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis. World J Surg 1995; 19 (5) 745-747
  • 9 Robertson GSM, Lloyd DM, Wicks ACB, Veitch PS. No obvious advantages for thoracoscopic two-stage oesophagectomy. Br J Surg 1996; 83 (5) 675-678
  • 10 Dexter SPL, Martin IG, McMahon MJ. Radical thoracoscopic esophagectomy for cancer. Surg Endosc 1996; 10 (2) 147-151
  • 11 Law S, Fok M, Chu KM, Wong J. Thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Surgery 1997; 122 (1) 8-14
  • 12 Osugi H, Takemura M, Higashino M, Takada N, Lee S, Kinoshita H. A comparison of video-assisted thoracoscopic oesophagectomy and radical lymph node dissection for squamous cell cancer of the oesophagus with open operation. Br J Surg 2003; 90 (1) 108-113
  • 13 Schoppmann SF, Prager G, Langer FB , et al. Open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy: a single-center case controlled study. Surg Endosc 2010; 24 (12) 3044-3053
  • 14 Parameswaran R, Veeramootoo D, Krishnadas R, Cooper M, Berrisford R, Wajed S. Comparative experience of open and minimally invasive esophagogastric resection. World J Surg 2009; 33 (9) 1868-1875
  • 15 Ben-David K, Sarosi GA, Cendan JC, Howard D, Rossidis G, Hochwald SN. Decreasing morbidity and mortality in 100 consecutive minimally invasive esophagectomies. Surg Endosc 2012; 26 (1) 162-167
  • 16 Kinjo Y, Kurita N, Nakamura F , et al. Effectiveness of combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy: comparison of postoperative complications and midterm oncological outcomes in patients with esophageal cancer. Surg Endosc 2012; 26 (2) 381-390
  • 17 Rizk NP, Ishwaran H, Rice TW , et al. Optimum lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer. Ann Surg 2010; 251 (1) 46-50
  • 18 Osugi H, Takemura M, Higashino M , et al. Learning curve of video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy and extensive lymphadenectomy for squamous cell cancer of the thoracic esophagus and results. Surg Endosc 2003; 17 (3) 515-519
  • 19 Miller JD, Jain MK, de Gara CJ, Morgan D, Urschel JD. Effect of surgical experience on results of esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma. J Surg Oncol 1997; 65 (1) 20-21
  • 20 Guo W, Zou YB, Ma Z , et al. One surgeon's learning curve for video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer with the patient in lateral position: how many cases are needed to reach competence?. Surg Endosc 2013; 27 (4) 1346-1352
  • 21 Lin J, Kang M, Chen C , et al. Thoracolaparoscopy oesophagectomy and extensive two-field lymphadenectomy for oesophageal cancer: introduction and teaching of a new technique in a high-volume centre. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2013; 43 (1) 115-121
  • 22 Dutkowski P, Hommel G, Böttger T, Schlick T, Junginger T. How many lymph nodes are needed for an accurate pN classification in esophageal cancer? Evidence for a new threshold value. Hepatogastroenterology 2002; 49 (43) 176-180
  • 23 Rizk NP, Ishwaran H, Rice TW , et al. Optimum lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer. Ann Surg 2010; 251 (1) 46-50
  • 24 Dhamija A, Rosen JE, Dhamija A , et al. Learning curve to lymph node resection in minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer. Innovations (Phila) 2014; 9 (4) 286-291
  • 25 Luketich JD, Pennathur A, Awais O , et al. Outcomes after minimally invasive esophagectomy: review of over 1000 patients. Ann Surg 2012; 256 (1) 95-103
  • 26 Takeno S, Takahashi Y, Moroga T, Kawahara K, Yamashita Y, Ohtaki M. Retrospective study using the propensity score to clarify the oncologic feasibility of thoracoscopic esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer. World J Surg 2013; 37 (7) 1673-1680
  • 27 Komine O, Tanaka Y, Kawashima Y , et al. Short- term postoperative superiority and 5- year follow- up outcomes of video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy for treatment of esophageal carcinoma: a historical comparison with conventional open esophageal under a single experienced surgeon. Esophagus 2014; 11 (1) 54-63
  • 28 Benzoni E, Terrosu G, Bresadola V , et al. A comparative study of the transhiatal laparoscopic approach versus laparoscopic gastric mobilisation and right open transthoracic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer management. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis 2007; 16 (4) 395-401