Dtsch Med Wochenschr 2014; 139(36): 1777
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1370254
Pro & Contra | Commentary
Gastroenterologie, Onkologie
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Biopsie beim hepatozellulären Karzinom – contra

Biopsy in hepatocellulary carcinoma – no
T. Helmberger
1   Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Neuroradiologie und Nuklearmedizin Klinikum Bogenhausen
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
26 August 2014 (online)

 
  • Literatur

  • 1 Forner A et al. Diagnosis of hepatic nodules 20 mm or smaller in cirrhosis: Prospective validation of the noninvasive diagnostic criteria for hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 2008; 47: 97-104
  • 2 Khalili K et al. Indeterminate 1-2-cm nodules found on hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance: biopsy for all, some, or none?. Hepatology 2011; 54: 2048-2054
  • 3 Leoni S et al. The impact of vascular and nonvascular findings on the noninvasive diagnosis of small hepatocellular carcinoma based on the EASL and AASLD Criteria. Am J Gastroenterol 2010; 105: 599-609
  • 4 Sangiovanni A et al. The diagnostic and economic impact of contrast imaging techniques in the diagnosis of small hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis. Gut 2010; 59: 638-644
  • 5 Serste T et al. Accuracy and disagreement of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of small hepatocellular carcinoma and dysplastic nodules: role of biopsy. Hepatology 2012; 55: 800-806