Eur J Pediatr Surg 2012; 22(05): 409-411
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1315809
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Distribution of Feeding Styles after Pyloromyotomy among Pediatric Surgical Training Programs in North America

David Juang
1   Department of Surgery, Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, Missouri, United States
,
Obinna O. Adibe
1   Department of Surgery, Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, Missouri, United States
,
Carrie A. Laituri
1   Department of Surgery, Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, Missouri, United States
,
Daniel J. Ostlie
1   Department of Surgery, Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, Missouri, United States
,
George W. Holcomb III
1   Department of Surgery, Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, Missouri, United States
,
Shawn D. St. Peter
1   Department of Surgery, Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, Missouri, United States
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

18 April 2012

21 April 2012

Publication Date:
07 July 2012 (online)

Abstract

Introduction The feeding regimen employed after pyloromyotomy for pyloric stenosis continues to be a topic of debate and has yet to be evaluated in a prospective, randomized trial. To understand the spectrum of current feeding schedules being utilized in the various training programs, we queried the program directors or representatives about their feeding schedules.

Methods Through the use of multiple electronic communication resources, we surveyed 47 pediatric training programs in the United States and Canada about their postpyloromyotomy feeding schedules. Questions included time to first feed, how the schedule is advanced, and criteria for stopping feeds and discharge.

Results Reponses were received from 34 of the 47 institutions. Six programs had variable times of delay before instituting feeding whether ad libitum (ad lib) or protocol. The average time of delay was 4.3 hours. Six programs reported both ad lib feed and protocol feeding regiments. Twelve institutions used ad lib feeding regiments. Eight started feeding without delay. Twenty-six programs including our institution currently employ a protocol-based feeding regiment. Of these programs, seven begin the protocol without delay.

Conclusions Despite retrospective evidence in support of ad lib feeds after pyloromyotomy, the majority of teaching institutions employs protocols for the postpyloromyotomy feeding schedule. There is clearly a role for a prospective, randomized trial to compare ad lib to schedule feeding.

 
  • References

  • 1 St Peter SD, Holcomb III GW, Calkins CM , et al. Open versus laparoscopic pyloromyotomy for pyloric stenosis: a prospective, randomized trial. Ann Surg 2006; 244 (3) 363-370
  • 2 Perger L, Fuchs JR, Komidar L, Mooney DP. Impact of surgical approach on outcome in 622 consecutive pyloromyotomies at a pediatric teaching institution. J Pediatr Surg 2009; 44 (11) 2119-2125
  • 3 Sola JE, Neville HL. Laparoscopic vs open pyloromyotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pediatr Surg 2009; 44 (8) 1631-1637
  • 4 Hall NJ, Pacilli M, Eaton S , et al. Recovery after open versus laparoscopic pyloromyotomy for pyloric stenosis: a double-blind multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2009; 373 (9661) 390-398
  • 5 Adibe OO, Nichol PF, Lim FY, Mattei P. Ad libitum feeds after laparoscopic pyloromyotomy: a retrospective comparison with a standardized feeding regimen in 227 infants. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2007; 17 (2) 235-237
  • 6 Garza JJ, Morash D, Dzakovic A, Mondschein JK, Jaksic T. Ad libitum feeding decreases hospital stay for neonates after pyloromyotomy. J Pediatr Surg 2002; 37 (3) 493-495
  • 7 Puapong D, Kahng D, Ko A, Applebaum H. Ad libitum feeding: safely improving the cost-effectiveness of pyloromyotomy. J Pediatr Surg 2002; 37 (12) 1667-1668
  • 8 Carpenter RO, Schaffer RL, Maeso CE , et al. Postoperative ad lib feeding for hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. J Pediatr Surg 1999; 34 (6) 959-961
  • 9 Lee AC, Munro FD, MacKinlay GA. An audit of post-pyloromyotomy feeding regimens. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2001; 11 (1) 12-14
  • 10 van der Bilt JD, Kramer WL, van der Zee DC, Bax NM. Early feeding after laparoscopic pyloromyotomy: the pros and cons. Surg Endosc 2004; 18 (5) 746-748
  • 11 Georgeson KE, Corbin TJ, Griffen JW, Breaux Jr CW. An analysis of feeding regimens after pyloromyotomy for hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. J Pediatr Surg 1993; 28 (11) 1478-1480
  • 12 Wheeler RA, Najmaldin AS, Stoodley N, Griffiths DM, Burge DM, Atwell JD. Feeding regimens after pyloromyotomy. Br J Surg 1990; 77 (9) 1018-1019
  • 13 Leinwand MJ, Shaul DB, Anderson KD. A standardized feeding regimen for hypertrophic pyloric stenosis decreases length of hospitalization and hospital costs. J Pediatr Surg 2000; 35 (7) 1063-1065
  • 14 Schärli AF, Leditschke JF. Gastric motility after pyloromyotomy in infants. A reappraisal of postoperative feeding. Surgery 1968; 64 (6) 1133-1137
  • 15 Foster ME, Lewis WG. Early postoperative feeding—a continuing controversy in pyloric stenosis. J R Soc Med 1989; 82 (9) 532-533
  • 16 Leahy A, Fitzgerald RJ. The influence of delayed feeding on postoperative vomiting in hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. Br J Surg 1982; 69 (11) 658-659
  • 17 Turnock RR, Rangecroft L. Comparison of postpyloromyotomy feeding regimens in infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. J R Coll Surg Edinb 1991; 36 (3) 164-165
  • 18 Gollin G, Doslouglu H, Flummerfeldt P , et al. Rapid advancement of feedings after pyloromyotomy for pyloric stenosis. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 2000; 39 (3) 187-190