Eur J Pediatr Surg 2012; 22(03): 222-227
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1308703
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

General Practitioners Assessment Highlights Excellent Patient Satisfaction Following Bar Removal after Nuss Procedure in Children and Adolescents

Mandy Hennig
1   Department of Pediatric Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
,
Joachim F. Kuebler
1   Department of Pediatric Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
,
Claus Petersen
1   Department of Pediatric Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
,
Martin L. Metzelder
1   Department of Pediatric Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

22 October 2011

02 November 2011

Publication Date:
08 May 2012 (online)

Abstract

Background We recently demonstrated that minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum (MIRPE) achieves a lasting patient satisfaction after bar removal. This correlated with parent ratings. It has been postulated that patient ratings may be biased by high preoperative patient expectations. The aim of this study was to compare patient self-assessment with general practitioners (GPs) assessment.

Methods Of the 39 patients who underwent bar removal after MIRPE between 2002 and 2006, 39 GPs were asked to answer a modified version of a former single-step questionnaire to evaluate their opinion on psychosocial and physical well-being of their patients. The subjective patient ratings were compared with the GP ratings.

Results Of the 39 GPs, 22 (56%) completed a questionnaire and assessed the outcome of the Nuss procedure. There was a highly significant correlation between GP and patient ratings (p < 0.001; correlation coefficient = 0.437). Mean total scores obtained from GPs were similar to patient scores (63.4 ± 2.6 SEM vs. 67.5 ± 2.4 SEM; not significant [NS]). Detailed analysis revealed that GPs scored several items differently to their patients: GPs scored social activity (p < 0.05) and preoperative self-esteem (p < 0.05) significantly lower, but pain episodes (p < 0.05) and impairment of daily activities (p < 0.05) during the period with the implanted bar significantly higher than their patients. Comparison of the 17 nonassessed cases, with the self-assessment of 22 patients with GP assessment, revealed no significant difference, making an analytical bias unlikely (67.5 ± 2.4 SEM vs. 67.3 ± 2.8 SEM; NS).

Conclusion GPs found a higher impairment of patient well-being during the period with an implanted bar, which might be related to the high patient motivation to cope with bar impairment. However, the all over GP and patient satisfaction was similar and excellent.

 
  • References

  • 1 Nuss D. Minimally invasive surgical repair of pectus excavatum. Semin Pediatr Surg 2008; 17 (3) 209-217
  • 2 Jacobsen EB, Thastum M, Jeppesen JH, Pilegaard HK. Health-related quality of life in children and adolescents undergoing surgery for pectus excavatum. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2010; 20 (2) 85-91
  • 3 Krasopoulos G, Dusmet M, Ladas G, Goldstraw P. Nuss procedure improves the quality of life in young male adults with pectus excavatum deformity. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006; 29 (1) 1-5
  • 4 Lam MW, Klassen AF, Montgomery CJ, LeBlanc JG, Skarsgard ED. Quality-of-life outcomes after surgical correction of pectus excavatum: a comparison of the Ravitch and Nuss procedures. J Pediatr Surg 2008; 43 (5) 819-825
  • 5 Lawson ML, Cash TF, Akers R , et al. A pilot study of the impact of surgical repair on disease-specific quality of life among patients with pectus excavatum. J Pediatr Surg 2003; 38 (6) 916-918
  • 6 Metzelder ML, Kuebler JF, Leonhardt J, Ure BM, Petersen C. Self and parental assessment after minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum: lasting satisfaction after bar removal. Ann Thorac Surg 2007; 83 (5) 1844-1849
  • 7 Roberts J, Hayashi A, Anderson JO, Martin JM, Maxwell LL. Quality of life of patients who have undergone the Nuss procedure for pectus excavatum: preliminary findings. J Pediatr Surg 2003; 38 (5) 779-783
  • 8 Kim HK, Shim JH, Choi KS, Choi YH. The quality of life after bar removal in patients after the nuss procedure for pectus excavatum. World J Surg 2011; 35 (7) 1656-1661
  • 9 Moss TP. The relationships between objective and subjective ratings of disfigurement severity, and psychological adjustment. Body Image 2005; 2 (2) 151-159
  • 10 Moerman DE, Jonas WB. Deconstructing the placebo effect and finding the meaning response. Ann Intern Med 2002; 136 (6) 471-476
  • 11 Kelly Jr RE, Cash TF, Shamberger RC , et al. Surgical repair of pectus excavatum markedly improves body image and perceived ability for physical activity: multicenter study. Pediatrics 2008; 122 (6) 1218-1222
  • 12 Krasopoulos G, Goldstraw P. Minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum deformity. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2011; 39 (2) 149-158
  • 13 Bessell A, Moss TP. Evaluating the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions for individuals with visible differences: a systematic review of the empirical literature. Body Image 2007; 4 (3) 227-238
  • 14 Cash TF, Fleming EC. The impact of body image experiences: development of the body image quality of life inventory. Int J Eat Disord 2002; 31 (4) 455-460
  • 15 Klassen AF, Stotland MA, Skarsgard ED, Pusic AL. Clinical research in pediatric plastic surgery and systematic review of quality-of-life questionnaires. Clin Plast Surg 2008; 35 (2) 251-267
  • 16 Lacey JH, Birtchnell SA. Body image and its disturbances. J Psychosom Res 1986; 30 (6) 623-631
  • 17 Weber PG, Huemmer HP, Reingruber B. Forces to be overcome in correction of pectus excavatum. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006; 132 (6) 1369-1373
  • 18 Nagasao T, Miyamoto J, Tamaki T , et al. Stress distribution on the thorax after the Nuss procedure for pectus excavatum results in different patterns between adult and child patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007; 134 (6) 1502-1507
  • 19 Kim H, Hwang JJ, Lee MK, Lee DY, Paik HC. Analysis of the Nuss procedure for pectus excavatum in different age groups. Ann Thorac Surg 2005; 80 (3) 1073-1077