Download PDF
Eur J Pediatr Surg 2012; 22(01): 017-020
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1285920
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Our Experience with Single Lung Ventilation in Thoracoscopic Paediatric Surgery

Z.A. Bataineh
1   Hannover Medical School, Department of Pediatric Surgery, Hannover, Germany
,
C. Zoeller
1   Hannover Medical School, Department of Pediatric Surgery, Hannover, Germany
,
C. Dingemann
1   Hannover Medical School, Department of Pediatric Surgery, Hannover, Germany
,
A. Osthaus
2   Hannover Medical School, Department of Pediatric Anaesthesiology, Hannover, Germany
,
R. Suempelmann
2   Hannover Medical School, Department of Pediatric Anaesthesiology, Hannover, Germany
,
B. Ure
1   Hannover Medical School, Department of Pediatric Surgery, Hannover, Germany
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

17 May 2011

14 July 2011

Publication Date:
29 September 2011 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Introduction Data on the feasibility and effects of single lung ventilation (SLV) in children are scarce. We conducted a retrospective study on the feasibility of SLV during video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) in children and adolescents undergoing major thoracic procedures.

Methods A retrospective chart review of all records from patients who underwent VATS at our institution from 2000 to 2010 was done. Patients receiving SLV were analysed in detail. Endpoints of the analysis were conversion to open thoracotomy (frequency and reasons), postoperative duration of ventilation, and pulmonary complications such as radiologically confirmed atelectasis and pneumonia.

Results 74 out of 305 patients (24%, 43 boys, 31 girls) with a mean age of 9.4 years (56 days–18 years) and mean weight of 34 kg (4.5–76 kg) had SLV. Lung resection was done in 43 (58%), pleural surgery in 17 (23%), a combination of both in 7 (9%), and mediastinal procedures in 7 (9%). 11 patients (15%) required conversion of VATS to open surgery, mostly because of problems with exposure of the operative field (73%). 32 patients (43%) were extubated immediately after the operation, whereas 8 (11%) required ventilation for more than 24 h. The mean intensive care unit stay was 1.6 days. 18 patients (24%) developed radiologically confirmed atelectasis, and 1 patient (1%) required bronchoscopic clearance. Pneumonia occurred in 1 case (1%) and was successfully treated with antibiotics.

Conclusion SLV is feasible in children and adolescents undergoing VATS for a broad spectrum of procedures. However, despite SLV, the conversion rate in our series was 15%. The main reason for conversion was problems with exposure of the operative field. The complication rate for SLV was low. Atelectasis developed in every fourth patient but usually resolved spontaneously, and intervention to achieve ventilation was rarely indicated.

Keywords

single lung ventilation (SLV) - video assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) - children
 

  • References

  • 1 Lawal TA, Gosemann JH, Kuebler JF , et al. Thoracoscopy versus thoracotomy improves midterm musculoskeletal status and cosmesis in infants and children. Ann Thorac Surg 2009; 87: 224-228
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Rothenberg SS. Thoracoscopic pulmonary surgery. Semin Pediatr Surg 2007; 16: 231-237
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Ure BM, Schmidt AI, Jesch NK. Thoracoscopic surgery in infants and children. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2005; 15: 314-318
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Byon HJ, Lee JW, Kim JK , et al. Anesthetic management of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) in pediatric patients: the issue of safety in infant and younger children. Korean J Anesthesiol 2010; 59: 99-103
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Gentili A, Lima M, De Rose R , et al. Thoracoscopy in children: anaesthesiological implications and case reports. Minerva Anestesiol 2007; 73: 161-171
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Haynes SR, Bonner S. Review article: anaesthesia for thoracic surgery in children. Paediatr Anaesth 2000; 10: 237-251
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Tonz M, Bachmann D, Mettler D , et al. Pulmonary function after one-lung ventilation in newborns: the basis for neonatal thoracoscopy. Ann Thorac Surg 1998; 66: 542-546
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Tonz M, Bachmann D, Mettler D , et al. Effects of one-lung ventilation on pulmonary hemodynamics and gas exchange in the newborn. Eur J Pediatr Surg 1997; 7: 212-215
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Ender J, Brodowsky M, Falk V , et al. High-frequency jet ventilation as an alternative method compared to conventional one-lung ventilation using double-lumen tubes during minimally invasive coronary artery bypass graft surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2010; 24: 602-607
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Meier AH, Hess CB, Cilley RE. Complications and treatment failures of video-assisted thoracoscopic debridement for pediatric empyema. Pediatr Surg Int 2010; 26: 367-371
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Chen MK, Schropp KP, Lobe TE. Complications of minimal-access surgery in children. J Pediatr Surg 1996; 31: 1161-1165
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 El-Dawlatly A, Al-Dohayan A, Riyad W , et al. Thoracoscopic sympathectomy: endobronchial anesthesia vs endotracheal anesthesia with intrathoracic CO2 insufflation. J Anesth 2002; 16: 13-16
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Baraka A, Slim M, Dajani A , et al. One-lung ventilation of children during surgical excision of hydatid cysts of the lung. Br J Anaesth 1982; 54: 523-528
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar