Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2011; 59(5): 293-297
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1271039
Original Cardiovascular

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

The Dilemma of Subaortic Stenosis – A Single Center Experience of 15 Years with a Review of the Literature

K. Valeske1 , C. Huber1 , M. Mueller2 , A. Böning1 , N. Hijjeh1 , D. Schranz3 , H. Akintuerk1
  • 1Department of Pediatric Cardiac Surgery, Children's Heart Center, Giessen, Germany
  • 2Department of Pediatric Anesthesiology, Children's Heart Center, Giessen, Germany
  • 3Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Children's Heart Center, Giessen, Germany
Further Information

Publication History

received Nov. 12, 2010 revised March 10, 2011

accepted March 14, 2011

Publication Date:
03 May 2011 (online)

Abstract

Objective: The term “subaortic stenosis” includes a variety of obstructions of the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT), ranging from a short (discrete) subvalvular membrane to long, tunnel-like narrowing. An association with other congenital lesions is frequent. We reviewed the reported literature and describe our results, analyzing the nomenclature of and risk factors for restenosis after surgical treatment. Methods: From 1994 to 2009, 81 children (53 males, 28 females; median age: 57 months, range [r]: 5–204) underwent surgical relief of a subaortic stenosis. Patients were divided, according to pathology, into short segment (group A, n = 42) and complex obstructions (group B, n = 39), with the latter including long segment stenosis and/or associated anomalies such as aortic coarctation, interrupted aortic arch or Shone's complex. Results: Surgery resulted in a significant reduction of the gradient between the left ventricle and the aorta in both groups (Δp group A: 51 ± 28 mmHg, group B: 46 ± 25 mmHg). There was no operative mortality. One patient died in the early postoperative period due to pericardial tamponade. Median follow-up was 90 months (r = 0.5–187). Twenty-five (31 %) patients required reoperation because of recurrent stenosis after a median of 43 months (r = 0.5–128). Seven (16 %) patients belonging to group A developed restenosis, and 18 (46 %) in group B. Freedom from reoperation for all patients was 60 % after 10 years. 10 (40 %) of the patients of group B were ultimately treated with a Ross-Konno reconstruction of the LVOT. Conclusion: Despite adequate surgical resection, recurrence of subaortic stenosis within several years after initial surgical treatment is frequent, especially in patients with complex lesions. In cases requiring reoperation, the surgical therapy is often extensive, and even includes Ross-Konno reconstruction of the LVOT.

References

  • 1 Kelly D T, Wulfsberg E, Rowe R R. Discrete subaortic stenosis.  Circ. 1972;  46 309-322
  • 2 Somerville J. Fixed subaortic stenosis – a frequently misunderstood lesion.  Int J of Card. 1985;  8 145-148
  • 3 Freedom R M. The long and the short of it: some thoughts about the fixed forms of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction.  J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;  30 1843-1846
  • 4 Kitchiner D. Subaortic stenosis: still more questions than answers.  Heart. 1999;  82 647-648
  • 5 Kalfa D, Ghez O, Kreitmann B, Metras D. Seecondary subaortic stenosis in heart defects without any subaortic obstruction: a multifactorial postoperative event.  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2007;  32 (4) 582-587
  • 6 Rosenquist G C, Clark E B, McAllister H A, Bharati S, Edwards J E. Increased mitral-aortic separation in discrete subaortic stenosis.  Circ. 1979;  60 70-74
  • 7 Rohlicek C V, Font del Pino S, Hosking M, Miro J, Côté J-M, Finley J. Natural history and surgical outcomes for isolated discrete subaortic stenosis in children.  Heart. 1999;  82 708-713
  • 8 Cape E C, Vanauker M D, Sigfusson G, Tacy T A, Del Nido P J. Potential role of mechanical stress in the etiology of pediatric heart disease: septal shear stress in subaortic stenosis.  J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;  30 247-254
  • 9 Brauner R, Laks H, Drinkwater D C, Shvarts O, Eghbali K, Galindo A. Benefits of early surgical repair in fixed subaortic stenosis.  J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;  30 1835-1842
  • 10 Karamlou T, Gurofsky R, Bojcevski A et al. Prevalence and associated risk factors for intervention in 313 children with subaortic stenosis.  Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;  84 900-906
  • 11 Dodge-Khatami A, Schmid M, Rousson V et al. Risk factors for reoperation after relief of congenital subaortic stenosis.  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008;  33 885-889
  • 12 Geva A, McMahon C J, Gauvreau K, Mohammed L, Del Nido P J, Geva T. Risk factors for reoperation after repair of discrete subaortic stenosis in children.  J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;  50 1498-1504
  • 13 Hirata Y, Chen J M, Quaegebeur J M, Mosca R S. The role of enucleation with or without septal myectomy for discrete subaortic stenosis.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009;  137 1168-1172
  • 14 Serraf A, Zoghby J, Lacour-Gayet F et al. Surgical treatment of subaortic stenosis: a seventeen-year experience.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1999;  117 669-678
  • 15 Talwar S, Choudhary S K, Airan B. Reoperation after relief of congenital subaortic stenosis.  Eur J Cardiothor Surg. 2008;  34 700-710
  • 16 Parry A J, Kovalchinb J P, Suda K et al. Resection of subaortic stenosis; can a more aggressive approach be justified?.  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1999;  15 631-638
  • 17 Lampros T D, Cobanoglu A. Discrete subaortic stenosis: an acquired heart disease.  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1998;  14 296-303
  • 18 Ruzmetov M, Vijay P, Rodefeld M D, Turrentine M W, Brown J W. Long-term results of surgical repair in patients with congenital subaortic stenosis.  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2006;  5 227-233
  • 19 Rayburn S T, Netherland D E, Heath B J. Discrete membranous subaortic stenosis: improved results after resection and myectomy.  Ann Thorac Surg. 1997;  64 105-109
  • 20 Roughneen P T, DeLeon S Y, Cetta F et al. Modified Konno-Rastan procedure for subaortic stenosis: indications, operative techniques and results.  Ann Thorac Surg. 1998;  65 1368-1376
  • 21 Calhoon J H, Bolton J W. Ross/Konno procedure for critical aortic stenosis in infancy.  Ann Thorac Surg. 1995;  60 S597-S599

Dr. Klaus Valeske

Children's Heart Center and Cardiovascular Surgery
University Giessen/Marburg

Feulgenstraße 12

35385 Giessen

Germany

Phone: +49 6 41 98 54 34 61

Fax: +49 6 41 98 54 34 69

Email: klaus.valeske@chiru.med.uni-giessen.de

    >