Synlett 2009(13): 2089-2092  
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1217520
LETTER
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart ˙ New York

Scope and Limitations of Samarium Diiodide Induced Cyclizations of Alkenyl-Substituted γ-Keto Esters to Benzannulated Cyclooctanol Derivatives

Jakub Saadi, Hans-Ulrich Reissig*
Institut für Chemie und Biochemie, Freie Universität Berlin, Takustr. 3, 14195 Berlin, Germany
Fax: +49(30)83855367; e-Mail: Hans.Reissig@chemie.fu-berlin.de;
Further Information

Publication History

Received 9 April 2009
Publication Date:
01 July 2009 (online)

Abstract

A series of γ-keto esters bearing various alkenyl substituents were synthesized and subjected to samarium diiodide mediated 8-endo-trig ketyl-alkene coupling reactions. Highly substituted benzannulated cyclooctanol derivatives were obtained in good yields and with moderate to excellent stereoselectivities. The obtained results demonstrate the influence of steric and electronic factors on the regio- and stereoselectivity of ketyl-alkene cyclizations. Stilbenyl-substituted derivatives can cyclize either to cyclooctanol or to cycloheptanol derivatives depending on the substitution pattern at the carbonyl group.

    References and Notes

  • Selected reviews:
  • 1a Petasis NA. Patane MA. Tetrahedron  1992,  48:  5757 
  • 1b Mehta G. Singh V. Chem. Rev.  1999,  99:  881 
  • 2 Namy JL. Girard P. Kagan HB. New J. Chem.  1977,  1:  5 
  • Reviews:
  • 3a Gopalaiah K. Kagan HB. New J. Chem.  2008,  32:  607 
  • 3b Ebran J.-P. Jensen CM. Johannesen SA. Karaffa J. Lindsay KB. Taaning R. Skrydstrup T. Org. Biomol. Chem.  2006,  4:  3553 
  • 3c Concellon JM. Rodriguez-Solla H. Eur. J. Org. Chem.  2006,  1613 
  • 3d Jung DY. Kim YH. Synlett  2005,  3019 
  • 3e Edmonds DJ. Johnston D. Procter D.-J. Chem. Rev.  2004,  104:  3371 
  • 3f Berndt M. Gross S. Hölemann A. Reissig H.-U. Synlett  2004,  422 
  • 3g Kagan HB. Tetrahedron  2003,  59:  10351 
  • 3h Steel PG. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1  2001,  2727 
  • 3i Krief A. Laval A.-M. Chem. Rev.  1999,  99:  745 
  • 3j Kagan HB. Namy JL. Top. Organomet. Chem.  1999,  2:  155 
  • 3k Molander GA. Harris CR. Tetrahedron  1998,  54:  3321 
  • 3l Molander GA. Harris CR. Chem. Rev.  1996,  96:  307 
  • 4a Inanaga J. Yokoyama Y. Hanada Y. Yamaguchi M. Tetrahedron Lett.  1991,  32:  6371 
  • 4b Matsuda F. Sakai T. Okada N. Miyashita M. Tetrahedron Lett.  1998,  39:  863 
  • 4c Tamiya H. Goto K. Matsuda F. Org. Lett.  2004,  6:  545 
  • 4d Molander GA. McKie JA. J. Org. Chem.  1994,  59:  3186 
  • 5a Molander GA. Alonso-Alija C. J. Org. Chem.  1998,  63:  4366 
  • 5b Molander GA. Machrouhi F. J. Org. Chem.  1999,  64:  4119 
  • 5c Molander GA. Koellner C. J. Org. Chem.  2000,  65:  8333 
  • 5d Molander GA. Brown GA. Storch de Gracia I. J. Org. Chem.  2002,  67:  3459 
  • 5e Molander GA. Le Huerou Y. Brown GA. J. Org. Chem.  2001,  66:  4511 
  • 6a Khan FA. Czerwonka R. Zimmer R. Reissig H.-U. Synlett  1997,  995 
  • 6b Reissig H.-U. Khan FA. Czerwonka R. Dinesh CU. Shaikh AL. Zimmer R. Eur. J. Org. Chem.  2006,  4419 
  • 6c Nandanan E. Dinesh CU. Reissig H.-U. Tetrahedron  2000,  56:  4267 
  • 7a Kunkel E. Reichelt I. Reissig H.-U. Liebigs Ann. Chem.  1984,  512 
  • 7b For a general review, see: Reissig H.-U. Zimmer R. Chem. Rev.  2003,  103:  1151 
  • 8a Suzuki A. J. Organomet. Chem.  1999,  576:  147 
  • 8b Molander GA. Rivero MR. Org. Lett.  2002,  4:  107 
  • 8c Molander GA. Bernardi CR. J. Org. Chem.  2002,  67:  8424 
  • 8d Yin L. Liebscher J. Chem. Rev.  2007,  107:  133 
  • 12a Dinesh CU. Reissig H.-U. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.  1999,  38:  789 ; Angew. Chem. 1999, 111, 874
  • 12b Berndt M. Reissig H.-U. Synlett  2001,  1290 
  • 12c Gross S. Reissig H.-U. Synlett  2002,  2027 
  • 12d Berndt M. Hlobilová I. Reissig H.-U. Org. Lett.  2004,  6:  957 
  • 12e Aulenta F. Berndt M. Brüdgam I. Hartl H. Sörgel S. Reissig H.-U. Chem. Eur. J.  2007,  13:  6047 
  • 12f Wefelscheid UK. Reissig H.-U. Adv. Synth. Catal.  2008,  350:  65 
  • 12g Wefelscheid UK. Berndt M. Reissig H.-U. Eur. J. Org. Chem.  2008,  3635 
  • 12h Kumaran RS. Reissig H.-U. Synlett  2008,  991 
  • For a recent study on the influence of HMPA on ketyl-alkene cyclizations, see:
  • 13a Sadasivam DV. Antharjanam PKS. Prasad E. Flowers RA. J. Am. Chem Soc.  2008,  130:  7228 
  • 13b Flowers RA. Synlett  2008,  1427 
9

Typical Procedure for SmI 2 -Induced Cyclizations - Conversion of 5 into 14 and 15
Samarium metal (278 mg, 1.85 mmol) and 1,2-diiodoethane (477 mg, 1.69 mmol) were placed under a flow of argon in a flame-dried, two-necked round-bottomed flask containing a magnetic stirring bar and a septum inlet. THF (20 mL) was added, and the mixture was vigorously stirred at r.t. for 2 h. HMPA (2.40 mL, 13.8 mmol) was added to this solution of SmI2, and after 10 min of stirring a solution of substrate 5 (200 mg, 0.77 mmol) and t-BuOH (146 µL, 1.54 mmol) in THF (31 mL) was added over 2 h. The mixture was stirred at r.t. for 16 h and quenched with sat. aq NaHCO3 solution (20 mL). The phases were separated and the aqueous layer was extracted with Et2O (3 × 25 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with H2O (10 mL) and brine (10 mL) and dried (Na2SO4). The products were purified by column chromatography (silica gel, hexane-EtOAc = 10:1) to furnish 80 mg (40%) 14 as colorless oil and 67 mg (38%) 15 as colorless crystals (mp 130-132 ˚C).
Analytical Data for Methyl (6 RS ,8 RS ,10 RS )-8-Hydroxy-8,10-dimethyl-5,6,7,8,9,10-hexahydrobenzo[8]-annulene-6-carboxylate (14)
Compound 14 shows temperature-dependent NMR spectra. At r.t. some signals appear broad, measurement at 55 ˚C allowed to see the signals more clearly. ¹H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3, 55 ˚C): δ = 1.20 (s, 3 H, 8-Me), 1.33 (dd, J = 11.5, 14.7 Hz, 1 H, 7-H), 1.33 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 3 H, 10-Me), 1.62 (dd, J = 11.4, 14.3 Hz, 1 H, 9-H), 1.67 (dd, J = 3.8, 14.7 Hz, 1 H, 7-H), 1.79-1.83 (m, 1 H, 9-H), 3.10 (dddd, J = 2.9, 3.8, 7.5, 11.5 Hz, 1 H, 6-H), 3.16 (dd, J = 2.9, 13.9 Hz, 1 H, 5-H), 3.36-3.43 (m, 1 H, 10-H), 3.43 (dd, J = 7.5, 13.9 Hz, 1 H, 5-H), 3.68 (s, 3 H, CO2Me), 6.97-6.99, 7.06-7.10, 7.17-7.25 (3 m, 1 H, 1 H, 2 H, Ar) ppm. The signal for the OH group could not be assigned unambiguously. ¹³C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3, 55 ˚C): δ = 23.2 (q, 10-Me), 30.2 (d, C-10), 32.3 (t, C-5), 36.0 (q, 8-Me), 36.5 (t, C-7), 42.2 (d, C-6), 55.1 (t, C-9), 71.5 (s, C-8), 125.1, 125.9, 127.1, 129.6, 136.5, 146.3 (4 d, 2 s, Ar), 51.7, 176.1 (q, s, CO2Me) ppm. IR (neat): ν = 3500 (br, OH), 3100-2840 (=CH, CH), 1715 (C=O) cm. ESI-TOF: m/z calcd for: 217.1255 [M + H]+, 239.1074 [M + Na]+, 255.0813 [M + K]+; found: 217.1267, 239.1095, 255.0844.
Analytical Data for (2 RS ,5 SR ,7 SR )-5,7-Dimethyl-1,5,6,7-tetrahydro-2,5-methano-4-benzoxonin-3 (2 H )-one (15)
¹H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 1.34 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 3 H, 7-Me), 1.36 (s, 3 H, 5-Me), 1.43 (dd, J = 1.1, 13.9 Hz,1 H, 12-H), 1.55 (dd, J = 11.3, 14.6 Hz, 1 H, 6-H), 1.74-1.79 (m, 1 H, 12-H), 2.05-2.09 (m, 1 H, 6-H), 2.76 (dqd, J = 1.3, 6.9, 11.3 Hz, 1 H, 7-H), 3.15 (dddd, J = 1.1, 2.5, 10.3, 12.8 Hz, 1 H, 2-H), 3.20 (dd, J = 12.8, 14.5 Hz, 1 H, 1-H), 3.31 (dd, J = 2.5, 14.5 Hz, 1 H, 1-H), 7.00-7.02, 7.15-7.18, 7.28-7.36 (3 m, 1 H, 1 H, 2 H, Ar) ppm. ¹³C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 22.5 (q, 7-Me), 29.6 (q, 5-Me), 30.0 (d, C-7), 34.2 (t, C-12), 34.5 (t, C-1), 39.3 (d, C-2), 51.4 (t, C-6), 86.3 (s, C-5), 125.4, 126.7, 127.9, 130.4, 136.8, 146.2 (4 d, 2 s, Ar), 181.5 (s, C-3) ppm. IR (KBr): ν = 3065-2825 (=CH, CH), 1755 (C=O) cm. Anal. Calcd for C15H18O2 (230.3): C, 78.23; H, 7.88. Found: C, 78.49; H, 7.93.

10

In cis products the lactone bridge is formed under the reaction conditions due to the proximity of the hydroxy and methoxycarbonyl groups.

11

The relative configurations of the 18b and 28 were unambiguously determined by the X-ray crystallography (Brüdgam, I.; Lentz, D. unpublished results, Freie Universität Berlin). For all other cyclization products the suggested relative configuratations are strongly supported by NOESY correlations.