Download PDF
Synlett 2009(10): 1659-1663  
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1217335
CLUSTER
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart ˙ New York

A Simple, General, and Highly Chemoselective Acetylation of Alcohols Using Ethyl Acetate as the Acetyl Donor Catalyzed by a Tetranuclear Zinc Cluster

Takanori Iwasaki, Yusuke Maegawa, Yukiko Hayashi, Takashi Ohshima*, Kazushi Mashima*
Department of Chemistry, Graduate School of Engineering Science, Osaka University, Toyonaka, Osaka 560-8531, Japan
e-Mail: ohshima@chem.es.osaka-u.ac.jp; e-Mail: mashima@chem.es.osaka-u.ac.jp;
Further Information

Publication History

Received 15 January 2009
Publication Date:
02 June 2009 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints All articles of this category

Abstract

In the presence of a Zn-cluster catalyst, alcohols are efficiently converted to the corresponding acetate just by refluxing in EtOAc. The mild reaction conditions enabled the reactions of various functionalized alcohols to proceed in good to excellent yield. Moreover, even when a large excess of the acetyl donor is used, the hydroxyl groups are selectively acetylated in the presence of highly nucleophilic aliphatic amino groups, approaching chemoselectivity to that of enzymatic system.

Key words

zinc clusters - catalysis - acetylations - transesterifications - green chemistry

    References and Notes

  • 1a Comprehensive Organic Synthesis   Vol 6.:  Trost BM. Fleming I. Pergamon Press; New York: 1992. 
    Google Scholar
  • 1b Larock RC. In Comprehensive Organic Transformations   2nd ed.:  Wiley-VCH; New York: 1996. 
    Google Scholar
  • 1c Otera J. In Esterification Methods, Reactions and Applications   Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 2003. 
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Protective Groups in Organic Synthesis   4th ed.:  Green TW. Wuts PGM. John Wiley and Sons; New Jersey: 2006. 
    Google Scholar
  • 3 For a representative example of catalytic acetylation with Ac2O under auxiliary base-free conditions, see: Sakakura A. Kawajiri K. Ohkubo T. Kosugi Y. Ishihara K. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  2007,  129:  14775 ; and references therein
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • For reviews, see:
  • 4a Otera J. Chem. Rev.  1993,  93:  1449 
    Google Scholar
  • 4b Hydonckx HE. De Vos DE. Chavan SA. Jacobs PA. Top. Catal.  2004,  27:  83 
    Google Scholar
  • 4c Grasa GA. Singh R. Nolan SP. Synthesis  2004,  971 
    Google Scholar
  • For acetylation using enol esters as an acyl donor, see:
  • 5a Kita Y. Maeda H. Omori K. Okuno T. Tamura Y. Synlett  1993,  273 
    Google Scholar
  • 5b Ishii Y. Takeno M. Kwasaki Y. Murromachi A. Nishiyama Y. Sakaguchi S. J. Org. Chem.  1996,  61:  3088 
    Google Scholar
  • 5c Dinh PM. Howarth JA. Hudnott AR. Williams JMJ. Tetrahedron Lett.  1996,  37:  7623 
    Google Scholar
  • 5d Orita A. Mitsutome A. Otera J. J. Org. Chem.  1998,  63:  2420 
    Google Scholar
  • 5e Ilankumaran P. Verkade JG. J. Org. Chem.  1999,  64:  9063 
    Google Scholar
  • 5f Lin M.-H. RajanBabu TV. Org. Lett.  2000,  2:  997 
    Google Scholar
  • 5g Grasa GA. Kissling RM. Nolan SP. Org. Lett.  2002,  4:  3583 
    Google Scholar
  • 5h Grasa GA. Güveli T. Singh R. Nolan SP. J. Org. Chem.  2003,  68:  2812 
    Google Scholar
  • 5i Bosco JWJ. Saikia AK. Chem. Commun.  2004,  1116 
    Google Scholar
  • 5j Shirae Y. Mino T. Hasegawa T. Sakamoto M. Fujita T. Tetrahedron Lett.  2005,  46:  5877 
    Google Scholar
  • 5k Bosco JWJ. Agrahari A. Saikia AK. Tetrahedron Lett.  2006,  47:  4065 
    Google Scholar
  • 5l Kobayashi J. Mori Y. Kobayashi S. Chem. Commun.  2006,  4227 
    Google Scholar
  • 5m Mino T. Hasegawa T. Shirae Y. Sakamoto M. Fujita T. J. Organomet. Chem.  2007,  692:  4389 
    Google Scholar
  • 5n Magen S. Ertelt M. Jatsch A. Plietker B. Org. Lett.  2008,  10:  53 
    Google Scholar
  • For acetylation with enol esters by enzymes, see:
  • 6a Wong C.-H. Whitesides GM. In Enzymes in Synthetic Organic Chemistry   Pergamon; Oxford: 1994. 
    Google Scholar
  • 6b Faber K. In Biotransformations in Organic Chemistry   Spinger; Berlin: 2000. 
    Google Scholar
  • 7a Nishiguchi T. Taya H. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  1989,  111:  9102 
    Google Scholar
  • 7b Iranpoor N. Shekarriz M. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn.  1999,  72:  455 
    Google Scholar
  • 7c Orita A. Sakamoto K. Hamada Y. Mitsutome A. Otera J. Tetrahedron  1999,  55:  2899 
    Google Scholar
  • 7d Ranu BC. Dutta P. Sarkar A. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1  2000,  2223 
    Google Scholar
  • 7e Habibi MH. Tangestaninejad S. Mirkhani V. Yadollahi B. Tetrahedron  2001,  57:  8333 
    Google Scholar
  • 7f Singh R. Kissling RM. Letellier M.-A. Nolan SP. J. Org. Chem.  2004,  69:  209 
    Google Scholar
  • 7g Tayebee R. Alizadeh MH. Monatsh. Chem.  2006,  137:  1063 
    Google Scholar
  • Substrates bearing cyclic acetal and TBDMS ether functionalities were used for In/I2 catalyst system, see ref. 7d. Representative examples using stoichiometric amounts of reagents, see:
  • 8a Posner GH. Oda M. Tetrahedron Lett.  1981,  22:  5003 
    Google Scholar
  • 8b Posner GH. Okada SS. Babiak KA. Miura K. Rose RK. Synthesis  1981,  789 
    Google Scholar
  • 9a Ohshima T. Iwasaki T. Mashima K. Chem. Commun.  2006,  2711 
    Google Scholar
  • 9b Ohshima T. Iwasaki T. Maegawa Y. Yoshiyama A. Mashima K. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  2008,  130:  2944 
    Google Scholar
  • 9c Iwasaki T. Maegawa Y. Hayashi Y. Ohshima T. Mashima K. J. Org. Chem.  2008,  73:  5147 
    Google Scholar
  • 9d Sniady A. Durham A. Morreale MS. Marcinek A. Szafert S. Lis T. Brzezinska KR. Iwasaki T. Ohshima T. Mashima K. Dembinski R. J. Org. Chem.  2008,  73:  5881 
    Google Scholar
  • 10a Burley SK. David PR. Taylor A. Lipscomb WN. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.  1990,  87:  6878 
    Google Scholar
  • 10b Roderick SL. Matthews BW. Biochemistry  1993,  32:  3907 
    Google Scholar
  • 10c Chevrier B. Schalk C. D’orchymont H. Rondeau JM. Moras D. Tarnus C. Structure (Cambridge, MA, U.S.)  1994,  2:  283 
    Google Scholar
  • 10d Leopoldini M. Russo N. Toscano M.
    J. Am. Chem. Soc.  2007,  129:  7776 
    Google Scholar
  • For a general review, see:
  • 11a Multimetallic Catalysts in Organic Synthesis   Shibasaki M. Yamamoto Y. Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 2004. 
    Google Scholar
  • For representative examples of multinuclear zinc catalysts, see:
  • 11b Yoshikawa N. Kumagai N. Matsunaga S. Moll G. Ohshima T. Suzuki T. Shibasaki M. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  2001,  123:  2466 
    Google Scholar
  • 11c Trost BM. Ito H. Silcoff ER. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  2001,  123:  3367 
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Otera J. Acc. Chem. Res.  2004,  37:  288 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 16 For a review, see: Nahmany M. Melman A. Org. Biomol. Chem.  2004,  2:  1563 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 17a Mukaiyama T. Pai F.-C. Onaka M. Narasaka K. Chem. Lett.  1980,  563 
    Google Scholar
  • 17b Brown BR. Cocker J. J. Chem. Res., Synop.  1984,  2:  46 
    Google Scholar
  • 17c Gardossi L. Bianchi D. Kibanov AM. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  1991,  113:  6328 
    Google Scholar
12

See Supporting Information for details.

14

In a similar way, acidic alcohols, such as 1,1,1,3,3,3-hexafluoropropan-2-ol (pK a 9.3), did not participate in the acylation, see ref. 9c.

15

For primary aliphatic alcohol selective acetylation by catalytic transesterification, see ref. 5d,f,i,k,7d,g.

18

Yield of 9 was determined after N-Boc protection to simplify the analysis.

19

Typical Experimental Procedure for the Acetylation of Alcohol 2f
A mixture of Zn4 (OCOCF3)6O (1, 36 mg, 0.038 mmol),
4-(triethylsiloxymethyl)benzyl alcohol (2f, 759 mg, 3.0 mmol), and EtOAc (5.0 mL) was refluxed for 18 h under an argon atmosphere. The resulting mixture was concentrated and purified by silica gel column chromatography (silica gel, hexane-EtOAc = 20:1 to 4:1) to provide the acetate 3f (790 mg, 89%) as a colorless oil together with unreacted substrate 2f (38 mg, 5%). IR (neat NaCl): 2955, 2876, 1744, 1517, 1458, 1415, 1379, 1362, 1228, 1092, 1019, 971, 820, 742 cm-¹. ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, 35 ˚C): δ = 0.65 (q, J = 7.5 Hz, 6 H, SiCH 2CH3), 0.98 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 9 H, SiCH2CH 3), 2.08 (s, 3 H, COCH 3), 4.73 (s, 2 H, ArCH 2OSi), 5.09 (s, 2 H, ArCH 2OAc), 7.32 (m, 4 H, Ar). ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3, 35 ˚C): δ = 4.51, 6.70, 20.92, 64.39, 66.13, 126.32, 128.21, 134.62, 141.54, 170.76. MS (EI): m/z (%) = 294 (1) [M+], 265 (62), 145 (100), 103 (39), 75 (20). HRMS (EI): m/z calcd for C16H26O3Si: 294.1651; found: 294.1646.