Simulators and training models for diagnostic and therapeutic gastrointestinal endoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Technical and Technology Review

Abstract

Gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy comprises both diagnostic and therapeutic procedures involving the luminal GI tract as well as the biliary tree, liver, and pancreas. GI endoscopy is challenging to learn, requiring both cognitive (nontechnical) and technical skills, and requires extensive practice to attain proficiency. Simulation-based training has been shown to assist trainees and young endoscopists in acquiring new skills and accelerating the learning curve. Moreover, simulation-based training creates an ideal environment for trainees to initially learn and practice skills while making mistakes with no risk to patients.

This review, divided in two parts, offers a comprehensive summary of the different classes of simulators available for GI endoscopic training.

In Part I, only mechanical simulators are reported and described. In Part II, animal simulators (ex vivo/in vivo) and virtual reality models are detailed, together with prototypes that are currently not commercially available.

^‡ Joint last authors

Publication History

Article published online:
04 April 2025

• References

• 1 Singh S, Sedlack RE, Cook DA. Effects of simulation-based training in gastrointestinal endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014; 12: 1611-1623.e4
• 2 Ekkelenkamp VE, Koch AD, de Man RA. et al. Training and competence assessment in GI endoscopy: a systematic review. Gut 2016; 65: 607-615
• 3 Antonelli G, Voiosu AM, Pawlak KM. et al. Training in basic gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Nurses and Associates (ESGENA) Position Statement. Endoscopy 2024; 56: 131-150
• 4 Markman HD. A new system for teaching proctosigmoidoscopic morphology. Am J Gastroenterol 1969; 52: 65-69
• 5 Goodman AJ, Melson J, Aslanian HR. et al. Endoscopic simulators. Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 90: 1-12
• 6 Ou A, Shin CM, Goodman AJ. et al. Endoscopic part-task training box scores correlate with endoscopic outcomes. Surg Endosc 2021; 35: 3592-3599
• 7 Thompson CC, Jirapinyo P, Kumar N. et al. Development and initial validation of an endoscopic part-task training box. Endoscopy 2014; 46: 735-744
• 8 Kim Y, Lee JH, Lee GH. et al. Simulator-based training method in gastrointestinal endoscopy training and currently available simulators. Clin Endosc 2023; 56: 1-13
• 9 Cha JM, Lee JI, Joo KR. et al. The box simulator is useful for training novice endoscopists in basic endoscopic techniques. Yonsei Med J 2012; 53: 304-309
• 10 Lee S, Ahn JY, Han M. et al. Efficacy of a three-dimensional-printed training simulator for endoscopic biopsy in the stomach. Gut Liver 2018; 12: 149-157
• 11 Lee DS, Ahn JY, Lee GH. A newly designed 3-dimensional printer-based gastric hemostasis simulator with two modules for endoscopic trainees (with video). Gut Liver 2019; 13: 415-420
• 12 Kanno T, Arata Y, Hatayama Y. et al. Novel simulator of endoscopic hemostasis with actual endoscope and devices. VideoGIE 2023; 8: 56-59
• 13 Kanno T, Arata Y, Greenwald E. et al. Interactive training with a novel simulation model for upper gastrointestinal endoscopic hemostasis improves trainee technique and confidence. Endosc Int Open 2024; 12: E245-E252
• 14 Plooy AM, Hill A, Horswill MS. et al. Construct validation of a physical model colonoscopy simulator. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 76: 144-50
• 15 Hill A, Horswill MS, Plooy AM. et al. Assessing the realism of colonoscopy simulation: the development of an instrument and systematic comparison of 4 simulators. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: 631-640
• 16 Plooy AM, Hill A, Horswill MS. et al. The efficacy of training insertion skill on a physical model colonoscopy simulator. Endosc Int Open 2016; 4: E1252-E1260
• 17 Gomez PP, Willis RE, Van Sickle K. Evaluation of two flexible colonoscopy simulators and transfer of skills into clinical practice. J Surg Educ 2015; 72: 220-227
• 18 Kaltenbach T, Leung C, Wu K. et al. R Use of the colonoscope training model with the colonoscope 3D imaging probe improved trainee colonoscopy performance: a pilot study. Dig Dis Sci 2011; 56: 1496-1502
• 19 Barducci L, Scaglioni B, Martin J. et al. P Active stabilization of interventional tasks utilizing a magnetically manipulated endoscope front robot. AI 2022; 9: 854081
• 20 Svendsen MB, Preisler L, Hillingsoe JG. et al. Using motion capture to assess colonoscopy experience level. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 6: 193-199
• 21 Mamunes AP, Campisano F, Martin J. et al. Magnetic flexible endoscope for colonoscopy: an initial learning curve analysis. Endosc Int Open 2021; 9: E171-E180
• 22 Fujii M, Onoyama T, Ikebuchi Y. et al. A novel humanoid-robot simulator for colonoscopy. Endoscopy 2021; 53: E291-E292
• 23 Finocchiaro M, Cortegoso Valdivia P, Hernansanz A. et al. Training simulators for gastrointestinal endoscopy: current and future perspectives. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13: 1427
• 24 Roser D, Nagl S, Ebigbo A. Navigating the learning landscape: Comprehensive training in third space endoscopy - training, techniques, and practical recommendations. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2024; 71: 101918
• 25 Sato H, Mizuno KI, Sato Y. et al. Development and use of a non-biomaterial model for hands-on training of endoscopic procedures. Ann Transl Med 2017; 5: 182
• 26 De Cristofaro E, Lafeuille P, Jacques J. et al. Non-animal endoscopic training models are also effective for simulation of endoscopic submucosal dissection with adaptive traction strategy. Endoscopy 2023; 55 (Suppl. 01) e973-e974
• 27 Lee SD, Kim JW, Lee KL. et al. A newly designed polyvinyl alcohol hydrogel-based gastric esd simulator for trainees: a pilot study. Research Square. 2021 Available from: https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-571577/v1/6539c1cd-64ed-4047-a530–0ba50042ad7f.pdf?c=1631884020
• 28 Lee DS, Lee GH, Kim SG. et al. Usefulness of a new polyvinyl alcohol hydrogel (PVA-H)-based simulator for endoscopic submucosal dissection training: a pilot study. Clin Endosc 2023; 56: 604-612
• 29 Kim ST, Lee JH. Endoscopic submucosal dissection hands-on training with artificial mucosal layer EndoGEL. J Innov Med Technol 2023; 1: 5-9
• 30 Mitsui T, Yoda Y, Sunakawa H. et al. Development of new gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection training model: A reproducibility evaluation study. Endosc Int Open 2022; 10: E1261-E1267
• 31 Mitsui T, Sunakawa H, Yoda Y. et al. Novel gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection training model enhances the endoscopic submucosal dissection skills of trainees: a multicenter comparative study. Surg Endosc 2024; 38: 3088-3095
• 32 Na HK, Ahn JY, Lee GH. et al. The efficacy of a novel percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy simulator using three-dimensional printing technologies. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019; 34: 561-566
• 33 Wright AP, Patel AH, Farida JP. et al. Simulation training improves trainee technical skill and procedural attitudes in endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement. Simul Healthc 2022; 17: 198-202
• 34 Katanuma A, Itoi T, Umeda J. et al. A novel dry model for practicable sphincterotomy and precut needle knife sphincterotomy. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2014; 2014: 908693
• 35 Boškoski I, Costamagna G. The Boškoski-Costamagna ERCP Trainer: from dream to reality. Endoscopy 2016; 48: 593
• 36 Jovanovic I, Fry LC, Rustemovic N. et al. Initial validation of a simple, nonbiological, mechanical ERCP training model for cannulation and stent placement. Endoscopy 2015; E585-E586
• 37 van der Wiel SE, Koch AD, Bruno MJ. Face and construct validity of a novel mechanical ERCP simulator. Endosc Int Open 2018; 6: E758-E765
• 38 van der Wiel SE, Koch AD, Bruno MJ. Face validity of a synthetic papilla designed for biliary sphincterotomy training. Endosc Int Open 2019; 7: E757-E761
• 39 Teles de Campos S, Boskoski I, Voiosu T. et al. Face and content validity of a biological papilla designed for the Boškoski-Costamagna ERCP simulator. Gastrointest Endosc 2023; 98: 822-829.e1
• 40 Voiosu T, Puscasu C, Orlandini B. et al. Motion training on a validated mechanical ERCP simulator improves novice endoscopist performance of selective cannulation: a multicenter trial. Endosc Int Open 2021; 9: E145-E151
• 41 van der Wiel SE, Rauws E, Van Gool S. et al. Impact of ERCP simulator training on early ERCP learning curves of novice trainees: a cohort study. Endosc Int Open 2023; 11: E690-E696
• 42 Teles de Campos S, Boškoski I, Voiosu T. et al. Fast-tracking ERCP learning with the Boškoski-Costamagna Trainer: results of a multicenter randomized clinical trial. Endoscopy 2025; 57: 230-239
• 43 Gerson LB, Van Dam J. Technology review: the use of simulators for training in GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 60: 992-1001
• 44 Hochberger J, Maiss J. Currently available simulators: ex vivo models. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2006; 16: 435-449
• 45 Neumann M, Hochberger J, Felzmann T. et al. Part 1 The Erlanger endo-trainer. Endoscopy 2001; 33: 887-890
• 46 Hochberger J, Matthes K, Maiss J. et al. Training with the compactEASIE biologic endoscopy simulator significantly improves hemostatic technical skill of gastroenterology fellows: a randomized controlled comparison with clinical endoscopy training alone. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 61: 204-215
• 47 Maiss J, Wiesnet J, Proeschel A. et al. Objective benefit of a 1-day training course in endoscopic hemostasis using the "compactEASIE" endoscopy simulator. Endoscopy 2005; 37: 552-558
• 48 Maiss J, Prat F, Wiesnet J. et al. The complementary Erlangen active simulator for interventional endoscopy training is superior to solely clinical education in endoscopic hemostasis – the French training project: a prospective trial. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006; 18: 1217-1225
• 49 Maiss J, Millermann L, Heinemann K. et al. The compactEASIE is a feasible training model for endoscopic novices: a prospective randomised trial. Dig Liver Dis 2007; 39: 70-80
• 50 Matthes K, Cohen J, Kochman ML. et al. Efficacy and costs of a one-day hands-on EASIE endoscopy simulator train-the-trainer workshop. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 62: 921-927
• 51 May A, Nachbar L, Schneider M. et al. Push-and-pull enteroscopy using the double-balloon technique: method of assessing depth of insertion and training of the enteroscopy technique using the Erlangen Endo-Trainer. Endoscopy 2005; 37: 66-70
• 52 Neumann M, Mayer G, Ell C. et al. The Erlangen Endo-Trainer: life-like simulation for diagnostic and interventional endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. Endoscopy 2000; 32: 906-910
• 53 Sedlack R, Petersen B, Binmoeller K. et al. A direct comparison of ERCP teaching models. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 57: 886-890
• 54 Gonzalez JM, Cohen J, Gromski MA. et al. Learning curve for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) of pancreatic lesions in a novel ex-vivo simulation model. Endosc Int Open 2016; 4: E1286-E1291
• 55 Matsuda K, Hawes RH, Sahai AV. et al. The role of simulators, models, phantoms: Where's the evidence?. Endoscopy 2006; 38 (Suppl. 01) S61-S64
• 56 Matsuda K, Hawes R, Sahai AV. et al. Development of new modules for the EUS Phantom (EUS RK model): evaluation by six EUS experts. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 61: P.AB292
• 57 Matthes K, Cohen J. The Neo-Papilla: a new modification of porcine ex vivo simulators for ERCP training (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 64: 570-576
• 58 Desilets DJ, Banerjee S, Barth BA. et al. Endoscopic simulators. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73: 861-867
• 59 Sedlack RE, Baron TH, Downing SM. et al. Validation of a colonoscopy simulation model for skills assessment. Am J Gastroenterol 2007; 102: 64-74
• 60 Ansell J, Mason J, Warren N. et al. Systematic review of validity testing in colonoscopy simulation. Surg Endosc 2012; 26: 3040-3052
• 61 Wagh MS, Waxman I. Animal models for endoscopic simulation. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2006; 16: 451-456
• 62 Gholson CF, Provenza JM, Silver RC. et al. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in the swine: a new model for endoscopic training and hepatobiliary research. Gastrointest Endosc 1990; 36: 600-603
• 63 Barthet M, Gasmi M, Boustiere C. et al. EUS training in a live pig model: does it improve echo endoscope hands-on and trainee competence?. Endoscopy 2007; 39: 535-539
• 64 Küttner-Magalhães R, Pimentel-Nunes P, Araújo-Martins M. et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD): how do Western endoscopists value animal models?. Scand J Gastroenterol 2021; 56: 492-497
• 65 Küttner-Magalhães R, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Bruno MJ. et al. Training in endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection: Face, content and expert validity of the live porcine model. United European Gastroenterol J 2018; 6: 547-557
• 66 Küttner-Magalhães R, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Bruno MJ. et al. A steep early learning curve for endoscopic submucosal dissection in the live porcine model. Dig Dis 2022; 40: 816-825
• 67 Triantafyllou K, Lazaridis LD. et al. Virtual reality simulators for gastrointestinal endoscopy training. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 6: 6-12
• 68 Gerson LB. Evidence-based assessment of endoscopic simulators for training. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2006; 16: 489-viii
• 69 Long V, Kalloo AN. AccuTouch Endoscopy Simulator: development, applications and early experience. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2006; 16: 479-487
• 70 Sedlack RE, Kolars JC. Colonoscopy curriculum development and performance-based assessment criteria on a computer-based endoscopy simulator. Acad Med 2002; 77: 750-751
• 71 MacDonald J, Ketchum J, Williams RG. et al. A lay person versus a trained endoscopist: can the preop endoscopy simulator detect a difference?. Surg Endosc 2003; 17: 896-898
• 72 Mahmood T, Darzi A. A study to validate the colonoscopy simulator. Surg Endosc 2003; 17: 1583-1589
• 73 Gerson LB, Van Dam J. A prospective randomized trial comparing a virtual reality simulator to bedside teaching for training in sigmoidoscopy [published correction appears in Endoscopy 2004; 36: 185]. Endoscopy 2003; 35: 569-575
• 74 Sedlack RE, Kolars JC, Alexander JA. Computer simulation training enhances patient comfort during endoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004; 2: 348-352
• 75 McConnell RA, Kim S, Ahmad NA. et al. Poor discriminatory function for endoscopic skills on a computer-based simulator. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 76: 993-1002
• 76 Ahlberg G, Hultcrantz R, Jaramillo E. et al. Virtual reality colonoscopy simulation: a compulsory practice for the future colonoscopist?. Endoscopy 2005; 37: 1198-1204
• 77 Kruglikova I, Grantcharov TP, Drewes AM. et al. The impact of constructive feedback on training in gastrointestinal endoscopy using high-fidelity virtual-reality simulation: a randomised controlled trial. Gut 2010; 59: 181-185
• 78 Mahmood T, Darzi A. The learning curve for a colonoscopy simulator in the absence of any feedback: no feedback, no learning. Surg Endosc 2004; 18: 1224-1230
• 79 Grover SC, Garg A, Scaffidi MA. et al. Impact of a simulation training curriculum on technical and nontechnical skills in colonoscopy: a randomized trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 82: 1072-1079
• 80 Sahakian AB, Laine L, Jamidar PA. et al. Can a computerized simulator assess skill level and improvement in performance of ERCP?. Dig Dis Sci 2016; 61: 722-730
• 81 Ende A, Zopf Y, Konturek P. et al. Strategies for training in diagnostic upper endoscopy: a prospective, randomized trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: 254-260
• 82 Ferlitsch A, Schoefl R, Puespoek A. et al. Effect of virtual endoscopy simulator training on performance of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in patients: a randomized controlled trial. Endoscopy 2010; 42: 1049-1056
• 83 Cohen J, Cohen SA, Vora KC. et al. Multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of virtual-reality simulator training in acquisition of competency in colonoscopy [published correction appears in Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 65: 740]. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 64: 361-368
• 84 Koch AD, Ekkelenkamp VE, Haringsma J. et al. Simulated colonoscopy training leads to improved performance during patient-based assessment. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 81: 630-636
• 85 Bittner 4th JG, Mellinger JD, Imam T. et al. Face and construct validity of a computer-based virtual reality simulator for ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71: 357-364
• 86 Georgiou K, Boyanov N, Antonakis P. et al. Validity of a virtual reality endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography simulator: can it distinguish experts from novices?. Front Surg 2023; 10: 1289197
• 87 Henniger D, Engelke M, Kreiser J. et al. Validation of the ViGaTu Immersive Virtual Reality Endoscopy Training System for physicians and nurses. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis 2024; 33: 226-233
• 88 Koch K, Duckworth-Mothes B, Schweizer U. et al. Development and evaluation of artificial organ models for ERCP training in patients with surgically altered anatomies. Sci Rep 2023; 13: 22920
• 89 Dhir V, Itoi T, Fockens P. et al. Novel ex vivo model for hands-on teaching of and training in EUS-guided biliary drainage: creation of "Mumbai EUS" stereolithography/3D printing bile duct prototype (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 81: 440-446
• 90 Dhir V, Itoi T, Pausawasdi N. et al. Evaluation of a novel, hybrid model (Mumbai EUS II) for stepwise teaching and training in EUS-guided biliary drainage and rendezvous procedures. Endosc Int Open 2017; 5: E1087-E1095
• 91 Dhir V, Udawat P, Shah R. et al. Evaluation of an all-in-one hybrid model (EUS Magic Box) for stepwise teaching and training in multiple interventional EUS procedures. Endosc Int Open 2022; 10: E634-E643
• 92 Hassan C, Ponchon T, Bisschops R. et al. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Publications Policy – Update 2020. Endoscopy 2020; 52: 123-126