Motion training on a validated mechanical ERCP simulator improves novice endoscopist performance of selective cannulation: a multicenter trial

Abstract

Background and study aims Current data show that traditional training methods in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) fall short of producing competent trainees. We aimed to evaluate whether a novel approach to simulator-based training might improve the learning curve for novice endoscopists training in ERCP.

Methods We conducted a multicenter, randomized controlled trial using a validated mechanical simulator (the Boškoski-Costamagna trainer). Trainees with no experience in ERCP received either standard cannulation training or motion training before undergoing standard cannulation training on the mechanical simulator. Trainees were timed and graded on their performance in selective cannulation of four different papilla configurations.

Results Thirty-six trainees (16 in the motion training group, 20 in the standard group) performed 720 timed attempts at cannulating the bile duct on the simulator. Successful cannulation was achieved in 698 of 720 attempts (96.9 %), with no significant difference between the two study groups (P = 0.37). Trainees in the motion training group had significantly lower median cannulation times compared to the standard group (36 vs. 48 seconds, P = 0.001) and better technical performance on the first papilla type (P = 0.013).

Conclusions Our findings suggest that motion training could be an innovative method aimed at accelerating the learning curve of novice trainees in the early phase of their training. Future studies are needed to establish its role in ERCP training programs.

Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
25. Januar 2021

• References

• 1 Wani S, Hall M, Wang AY. et al. Variation in learning curves and competence for ERCP among advanced endoscopy trainees by using cumulative sum analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 83: 711-719 e11
• 2 Voiosu T, Balanescu P, Voiosu A. et al. Measuring trainee competence in performing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A systematic review of the literature. United European Gastroenterol J 2019; 7: 239-249
• 3 Leung J, Liao W, Wong S. et al. A RCT of mechanical simulator practice and usual training vs. usual training on novice trainee clinical ERCP performance. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69: AB141
• 4 Lim B, Leung J, Yen D. et al. Effect of ERCP mechanical simulator (EMS) practice on trainees? ERCP performance in the early learning period: U.S. multi-center randomized controlled trial. . Am J Gastroenterol 2011; 106: 300-306
• 5 Gregoire D, Rateb G. Learning ERCP with the Boskoski-Costamagna mechanical simulator: a single traineeʼs experience. Endoscopy 2018; 50: S163
• 6 van der Wiel SE, Kuttner Magalhaes R, Rocha Goncalves CR. et al. Simulator training in gastrointestinal endoscopy – From basic training to advanced endoscopic procedures. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2016; 30: 375-387
• 7 Ekkelenkamp VE, Koch AD, de Man RA. et al. Training and competence assessment in GI endoscopy: a systematic review. Gut 2016; 65: 607-615
• 8 van der Wiel S, Koch A, Bruno M. Face and construct validity of a novel mechanical ERCP simulator. Endosc Int Open 2018; 6: E758-E765
• 9 Boskoski I, Landi R, Bove V. et al. New methods of teaching axis in ERCP: can I write my name?. VideoGIE 2018; 03: 45-46
• 10 Boškoski I, Costamagna G. The Boškoski-Costamagna ERCP Trainer: from dream to reality. Endoscopy 2016; 48: 593
• 11 Wani S, Keswani RN, Petersen B. et al. Training in EUS and ERCP: standardizing methods to assess competence. Gastrointest Endosc 2018; 87: 1371-1382
• 12 Eversbusch A, Grantcharov TP. Learning curves and impact of psychomotor training on performance in simulated colonoscopy: a randomized trial using a virtual reality endoscopy trainer. Surg Endosc 2008; 18: 1514-1518
• 13 Jirapinyo P, Abidi WM, Aihara H. et al. Preclinical endoscopic training using a part-task simulator: learning curve assessment and determination of threshold score for advancement to clinical endoscopy. Surg Endosc 2017; 31: 4010-4015
• 14 Voiosu T, Voiosu A, Bengus A. et al. Trainee involvement increases precut rates and delays access to the common bile duct without an increase in procedure-related adverse events: a brave new world of ERCP training?. Romanian J Int Med 2017; 56: 55-61
• 15 Sedlack R, Petersen B, Binmoeller K. et al. A direct comparison of ERCP teaching models. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 57: 886-890
• 16 Leung JW, Yen D. ERCP training - the potential role of simulation practice. J Interv Gastroenterol 2011; 1: 14-18
• 17 Leung J, Lim B, Ngo C. et al. Head-to-head comparison of practice with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography computer and mechanical simulators by experienced endoscopists and trainees. Dig Endosc 2012; 24: 175-181
• 18 Leung JW, Wang D, Hu B. et al. A head-to-head hands-on comparison of ERCP mechanical simulator (EMS) and ex-vivo porcine stomach model (PSM). J Interv Gastroenterol 2011; 1: 108-113
• 19 Habaz I, Perretta S, Okrainec A. et al. Adaptation of the fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery box for endoscopic simulation: performance evaluation of the first 100 participants. Surg Endosc 2019; 33: 3444-3450