Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2023; 71(08): 664-670
DOI: 10.1055/a-2041-3625
Original Thoracic

Efficacy of Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Stage II/III Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutations

Takeshi Matsunaga
1   Department of General Thoracic Surgery, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
,
Kazuya Takamochi
1   Department of General Thoracic Surgery, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
,
Aritoshi Hattori
1   Department of General Thoracic Surgery, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
,
Mariko Fukui
1   Department of General Thoracic Surgery, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
,
Kenji Suzuki
1   Department of General Thoracic Surgery, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
› Author Affiliations
Funding This work was supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid for Cancer Research from the Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare of Japan and the Smoking Research Foundation.

Abstract

Background Adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy improves the survival of patients with resected pathological stage II/III nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the efficacy in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations remains controversial.

Methods This retrospective study included 353 patients with resected pathological N1/N2 stage II/III NSCLC between 2010 and 2016. Mutant EGFR (mEGFR) was detected in 76 patients. Adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) was administered to 151 patients. We compared cancer-specific survival (CSS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) between AC and surgery-alone (SA) groups, including patients with wild-type EGFR (wEGFR) and mEGFR. Using multivariate analysis, we evaluated the prognostic factors in patients with wEGFR and mEGFR.

Results The median follow-up time was 4.7 years. In patients with wEGFR, the differences in CSS and RFS between the AC (n = 114) and SA (n = 163) groups were significant (CSS: 66.8% [5 years] vs. 49.4% [5 years], p = 0.001; RFS: 54.2% [5 years] vs. 39.2% [5 years], p = 0.013). The significant prognostic factors were AC (vs. SA; p < 0.0001), diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide  > 60% (p = 0.028), tumor size (p < 0.001), lymphatic permeation (p = 0.041), and pN1 (vs. pN2; p < 0.001). However, the differences in CSS and RFS between the AC (n = 37) and SA (n = 39) groups were not significant (CSS: 64.0% [5 years] vs. 58.1% [5 years], p = 0.065; RFS: 45.0% [5 years] vs. 33.8% [5 years], p = 0.302). Multivariate analysis identified no significant prognostic factors in patients with mEGFR.

Conclusion We demonstrated the efficacy of AC in patients with mEGFR and wEGFR. The efficacy of AC may be lower in patients with mEGFR than in those with wEGFR.

Ethical Approval Statement

This retrospective study was performed under a waiver of authorization obtained from the Institutional Review Board of our institution (no. 20-255).


Data Availability Statement

All relevant data are within the manuscript, and other detailed data cannot be shared publicly because of the privacy of the study participants.




Publication History

Received: 10 December 2022

Accepted: 21 February 2023

Accepted Manuscript online:
23 February 2023

Article published online:
28 March 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 Pignon JP, Tribodet H, Scagliotti GV. et al; LACE Collaborative Group. Lung adjuvant cisplatin evaluation: a pooled analysis by the LACE Collaborative Group. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26 (21) 3552-3559
  • 2 Arriagada R, Bergman B, Dunant A, Le Chevalier T, Pignon JP, Vansteenkiste J. International Adjuvant Lung Cancer Trial Collaborative Group. Cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with completely resected non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2004; 350 (04) 351-360
  • 3 Douillard JY, Rosell R, De Lena M. et al. Adjuvant vinorelbine plus cisplatin versus observation in patients with completely resected stage IB-IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer (Adjuvant Navelbine International Trialist Association [ANITA]): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 2006; 7 (09) 719-727
  • 4 Winton T, Livingston R, Johnson D. et al; National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group, National Cancer Institute of the United States Intergroup JBR.10 Trial Investigators. Vinorelbine plus cisplatin vs. observation in resected non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2005; 352 (25) 2589-2597
  • 5 Norton L. Theoretical concepts and the emerging role of taxanes in adjuvant therapy. Oncologist 2001; 6 (Suppl 3): 30-35
  • 6 Castellanos E, Feld E, Horn L. Driven by mutations: the predictive value of mutation subtype in EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 2017; 12 (04) 612-623
  • 7 Rosell R, Carcereny E, Gervais R. et al; Spanish Lung Cancer Group in collaboration with Groupe Français de Pneumo-Cancérologie and Associazione Italiana Oncologia Toracica. Erlotinib versus standard chemotherapy as first-line treatment for European patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (EURTAC): a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2012; 13 (03) 239-246
  • 8 Mok TS, Wu YL, Thongprasert S. et al. Gefitinib or carboplatin-paclitaxel in pulmonary adenocarcinoma. N Engl J Med 2009; 361 (10) 947-957
  • 9 Mitsudomi T, Morita S, Yatabe Y. et al; West Japan Oncology Group. Gefitinib versus cisplatin plus docetaxel in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer harbouring mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor (WJTOG3405): an open label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2010; 11 (02) 121-128
  • 10 Maemondo M, Inoue A, Kobayashi K. et al; North-East Japan Study Group. Gefitinib or chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer with mutated EGFR. N Engl J Med 2010; 362 (25) 2380-2388
  • 11 Kenmotsu H, Yamamoto N, Yamanaka T. et al. Randomized phase III study of pemetrexed plus cisplatin versus vinorelbine plus cisplatin for completely resected stage II to IIIA nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 2020; 38 (19) 2187-2196
  • 12 Arriagada R, Dunant A, Pignon JP. et al. Long-term results of the international adjuvant lung cancer trial evaluating adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy in resected lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28 (01) 35-42
  • 13 Takamochi K, Oh S, Matsunaga T, Suzuki K. Prognostic impacts of EGFR mutation status and subtype in patients with surgically resected lung adenocarcinoma. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2017; 154 (05) 1768-1774 .e1
  • 14 Toyooka S, Okumura N, Nakamura H. et al. A multicenter randomized controlled study of paclitaxel plus carboplatin versus oral uracil–tegafur as the adjuvant chemotherapy in resected non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 2018; 13 (05) 699-706
  • 15 Wada H, Hitomi S, Teramatsu T. West Japan Study Group for Lung Cancer Surgery. Adjuvant chemotherapy after complete resection in non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 1996; 14 (04) 1048-1054
  • 16 Kato H, Ichinose Y, Ohta M. et al; Japan Lung Cancer Research Group on Postsurgical Adjuvant Chemotherapy. A randomized trial of adjuvant chemotherapy with uracil-tegafur for adenocarcinoma of the lung. N Engl J Med 2004; 350 (17) 1713-1721
  • 17 Goldstraw P, Chansky K, Crowley J. et al; International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Staging and Prognostic Factors Committee, Advisory Boards, and Participating Institutions, International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Staging and Prognostic Factors Committee Advisory Boards and Participating Institutions. The IASLC lung cancer staging project: proposals for revision of the TNM stage groupings in the forthcoming (eighth) edition of the TNM classification for lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 2016; 11 (01) 39-51
  • 18 Wu YL, Zhou C, Hu CP. et al. Afatinib versus cisplatin plus gemcitabine for first-line treatment of Asian patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer harbouring EGFR mutations (LUX-Lung 6): an open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2014; 15 (02) 213-222
  • 19 Yang JC, Wu YL, Schuler M. et al. Afatinib versus cisplatin-based chemotherapy for EGFR mutation-positive lung adenocarcinoma (LUX-Lung 3 and LUX-Lung 6): analysis of overall survival data from two randomised, phase 3 trials. Lancet Oncol 2015; 16 (02) 141-151
  • 20 Suehisa H, Toyooka S, Hotta K. et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor mutation status and adjuvant chemotherapy with uracil-tegafur for adenocarcinoma of the lung. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25 (25) 3952-3957
  • 21 Goss GD, O'Callaghan C, Lorimer I. et al. Gefitinib versus placebo in completely resected non-small-cell lung cancer: results of the NCIC CTG BR19 study. J Clin Oncol 2013; 31 (27) 3320-3326
  • 22 Kelly K, Altorki NK, Eberhardt WE. et al. Adjuvant erlotinib versus placebo in patients with stage IB-IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer (RADIANT): a randomized, double-blind, phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 2015; 33 (34) 4007-4014
  • 23 Zhong WZ, Wang Q, Mao WM. et al; ADJUVANT investigators. Gefitinib versus vinorelbine plus cisplatin as adjuvant treatment for stage II-IIIA (N1-N2) EGFR-mutant NSCLC (ADJUVANT/CTONG1104): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol 2018; 19 (01) 139-148
  • 24 Wu YL. CTONG1104: Adjuvant gefitinib versus chemotherapy for resected N1–N2 NSCLC with EGFR mutation—final overall survival analysis of the randomized phase III trial 1 analysis of the randomized phase III trial. ASCO Virtual Scientific Program, American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2020
  • 25 Wu YL, Tsuboi M, He J. et al; ADAURA Investigators. Osimertinib in resected EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2020; 383 (18) 1711-1723