Preoperative Bladder Capacity Predicts Social Continence following Bladder Neck Reconstruction in Children Born with Exstrophy–Epispadias Complex

Abstract

Introduction The aim of the study is to review the continence and volitional voiding rate in a single center cohort of exstrophy–epispadias patients following Young-Dees-Leadbetter bladder neck reconstruction and to explore factors which predict continence.

Materials and Methods Children who underwent Young-Dees-Leadbetter bladder neck reconstruction as a final stage of repair in a large single low-volume center in a small-population country between 1997 and 2019 were included. Demographic and clinical details were extracted from the patients' charts. The primary end point was continence and volitional voiding. Patients were categorized as incontinent, socially continent (daytime dry intervals > 3 hours, wet nights) and fully continent (daytime dry intervals > 3 hours, dry nights).

Results The study cohort included 27 patients whose median age at reconstruction was 5 years, and median follow-up was 7.8 years (interquartile range [IQR] 6–11.2). The cohort included 24 classic exstrophy patients (89%, 17 males and 7 females) and 3 isolated complete epispadias patients (11%, 1 male and 2 females). Nine (33%) patients achieved full continence and social continence was achieved by nine (33%) patients, for an overall social continence rate of 67%. Preoperative bladder capacity of 110 mL or more was associated with achieving social continence (odds ratio = 6.4, p = 0.047). The overall volitional voiding rate was 67%.

Conclusion Young-Dees-Leadbetter bladder neck reconstruction yielded rates of 33% for full continence and 67% for social continence and volitional voiding. These rates are comparable to those of large high-volume centers. A preoperative capacity of 110 mL or more was the sole predictor of social continence.

Keywords

bladder exstrophy - urinary incontinence - outcome - reconstructive surgery

Publication History

Received: 10 September 2022

Accepted: 15 December 2022

Accepted Manuscript online:
22 December 2022

Article published online:
31 January 2023

• References

• 1 Promm M, Roesch WH. Recent trends in the management of bladder exstrophy: the Gordian knot has not yet been cut. Front Pediatr 2019; 7 (MAR): 110
• 2 Maruf M, Manyevitch R, Michaud J. et al. Urinary continence outcomes in classic bladder exstrophy: a long-term perspective. J Urol 2020; 203 (01) 200-205
• 3 Weiss DA, Shukla AR, Borer JG. et al. Evaluation of outcomes following complete primary repair of bladder exstrophy at three individual sites prior to the establishment of a multi-institutional collaborative model. J Pediatr Urol 2020; 16 (04) 435.e1-435.e6
• 4 Jarzebowski AC, McMullin ND, Grover SR, Southwell BR, Hutson JM. The Kelly technique of bladder exstrophy repair: continence, cosmesis and pelvic organ prolapse outcomes. J Urol 2009; 182 (Suppl. 04) 1802-1806
• 5 Bar-Yosef Y, Binyamini J, Sofer M, Ben-Chaim J. Role of routine cystoscopy and cystography in exstrophy-epispadias complex. J Pediatr Urol 2016; 12 (02) 117.e1-117.e4
• 6 Szymanski KM, Fuchs M, Mcleod D. et al; Pediatric Urology Midwest Alliance (PUMA). Probability of bladder augmentation, diversion and clean intermittent catheterization in classic bladder exstrophy: a 36-year, multi-institutional, retrospective cohort study. J Urol 2019; 202 (06) 1256-1262
• 7 Ben-Chaim J, Binyamini Y, Segev E, Sofer M, Bar-Yosef Y. Can classic bladder exstrophy be safely and successfully reconstructed at a low volume center?. J Urol 2016; 195 (01) 150-154
• 8 Bar-Yosef Y, Sofer M, Ekstein MP, Binyamini Y, Ben-Chaim J. Results of Epispadias Repair Using the Modified Cantwell-Ransley Technique. . Urology. Published July 20, 2016. Accessed September 10, 2016, at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27450348
• 9 Gearhart JP, Di Carlo HN. Exstrophy-Epispadias Complex. 12th ed. Philadelphia, PA:: Elsevier Inc.; 2021.
• 10 Baird AD, Nelson CP, Gearhart JP. Modern staged repair of bladder exstrophy: a contemporary series. J Pediatr Urol 2007; 3 (04) 311-315
• 11 Mouriquand PDE, Bubanj T, Feyaerts A. et al. Long-term results of bladder neck reconstruction for incontinence in children with classical bladder exstrophy or incontinent epispadias. BJU Int 2003; 92 (09) 997-1001 , discussion 1002
• 12 Chan DY, Jeffs RD, Gearhart JP. Determinants of continence in the bladder exstrophy population: predictors of success?. Urology 2001; 57 (04) 774-777
• 13 Husmann DA, McLorie GA, Churchill BM. Closure of the exstrophic bladder: an evaluation of the factors leading to its success and its importance on urinary continence. J Urol 1989;142(2 Pt 2):522–524, discussion 542–543
• 14 Ellison JS, Shnorhavorian M, Willihnganz-Lawson K, Grady R, Merguerian PA. A critical appraisal of continence in bladder exstrophy: long-term outcomes of the complete primary repair. J Pediatr Urol 2016; 12 (04) 205.e1-205.e7
• 15 Arena S, Dickson AP, Cervellione RM. Relationship between the size of the bladder template and the subsequent bladder capacity in bladder exstrophy. J Pediatr Surg 2012; 47 (02) 380-382
• 16 Di Carlo HN, Maruf M, Jayman J, Benz K, Kasprenski M, Gearhart JP. The inadequate bladder template: Its effect on outcomes in classic bladder exstrophy. J Pediatr Urol 2018; 14 (05) 427.e1-427.e7
• 17 Lloyd JC, Spano SM, Ross SS, Wiener JS, Routh JC. How dry is dry? A review of definitions of continence in the contemporary exstrophy/epispadias literature. J Urol 2012; 188 (05) 1900-1904